Critical Competencies for the Innovativeness of Value Creation Champions: Identifying Challenges and Work-integrated Solutions ☆

Medium-sized manufacturers of technical products with a high degree of in-house value adding activities – so-called value creation champions – are very important to the success of German industry and to safeguarding attractive jobs in Germany. Key to their success is their distinct innovativeness. The innovative capacities of these companies are increasingly under threat, especially as they are often based on the competencies of only few individual employees. Therefore, solutions are needed to first identify such critical competencies and then to develop new ways of work-integrated learning and knowledge exchange to develop respective capabilities. Based on current literature this paper first identifies the importance of four clusters of competencies, namely network competence, creative problem-solving competence, overview competence and integration competence, and explains under which conditions they should be rated as critical. This paper then proposes a five-step-process that enables companies to identify possible critical competencies and take suitable measures to avoid putting their innovativeness at risk.

[1]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[2]  Ernst Hartmann,et al.  Arbeitsgestaltung für Industrie 4.0: Alte Wahrheiten, neue Herausforderungen , 2015 .

[3]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of product innovations: defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior , 2005 .

[4]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  User involvement competence for radical innovation , 2007 .

[5]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[6]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[7]  H. Simon Hidden Champions-Aufbruch nach Globalia : die Erfolgsstrategien unbekannter Weltmarktführer , 2012 .

[8]  Wilfred Dolfsma,et al.  Bridging firm-internal boundaries for innovation: Directed communication orientation and brokering roles , 2015 .

[9]  J. Senker Tacit Knowledge and Models of Innovation , 1995 .

[10]  Wilfried Sihn,et al.  Tangible Industry 4.0: A Scenario-Based Approach to Learning for the Future of Production , 2016 .

[11]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Exploring Differences between Inventors, Champions, Implementers and Innovators in Creating and Developing New Products in Large, Mature Firms , 2007 .

[12]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung : eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus , 1997 .

[13]  Benjamin Schültz Innovationsförderung durch Promotorenentwicklung , 2014 .

[14]  Peter Letmathe,et al.  Competence management in the age of Cyber Physical Systems , 2017 .

[15]  J. D. Jong,et al.  Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour , 2010 .

[16]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms , 2005 .

[17]  S. Dreyfus The Five-Stage Model of Adult Skill Acquisition , 2004 .

[18]  Dennis R. Brophy Understanding, Measuring, and Enhancing Individual Creative Problem-Solving Efforts , 1998 .

[19]  Eoin Whelan,et al.  Creating Employee Networks That Deliver Open Innovation , 2011 .

[20]  Ronald Mascitelli From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation , 2000 .

[21]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Arbeiten im Mittelstand 4.0 – KMU im Spannungsfeld des digitalen Wandels , 2015, HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik.