Library-based numerical reduction of the Hodgkin–Huxley neuron for network simulation

We present an efficient library-based numerical method for simulating the Hodgkin–Huxley (HH) neuronal networks. The key components in our numerical method involve (i) a pre-computed high resolution data library which contains typical neuronal trajectories (i.e., the time-courses of membrane potential and gating variables) during the interval of an action potential (spike), thus allowing us to avoid resolving the spikes in detail and to use large numerical time steps for evolving the HH neuron equations; (ii) an algorithm of spike-spike corrections within the groups of strongly coupled neurons to account for spike-spike interactions in a single large time step. By using the library method, we can evolve the HH networks using time steps one order of magnitude larger than the typical time steps used for resolving the trajectories without the library, while achieving comparable resolution in statistical quantifications of the network activity, such as average firing rate, interspike interval distribution, power spectra of voltage traces. Moreover, our large time steps using the library method can break the stability requirement of standard methods (such as Runge–Kutta (RK) methods) for the original dynamics. We compare our library-based method with RK methods, and find that our method can capture very well phase-locked, synchronous, and chaotic dynamics of HH neuronal networks. It is important to point out that, in essence, our library-based HH neuron solver can be viewed as a numerical reduction of the HH neuron to an integrate-and-fire (I&F) neuronal representation that does not sacrifice the gating dynamics (as normally done in the analytical reduction to an I&F neuron).

[1]  Aaditya V. Rangan,et al.  Architectural and synaptic mechanisms underlying coherent spontaneous activity in V1. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  G Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Efficient estimation of phase-resetting curves in real neurons and its significance for neural-network modeling. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[3]  Louis Tao,et al.  Efficient and Accurate Time-Stepping Schemes for Integrate-and-Fire Neuronal Networks , 2001, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[4]  O Kinouchi,et al.  Scaling law for the transient behavior of type-II neuron models. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  J. M. Watt Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations , 1972 .

[6]  David K. Campbell,et al.  Resonance structure in kink-antikink interactions in φ4 theory , 1983 .

[7]  David K. Campbell,et al.  Order from Chaos , 2020, History of Particle Theory.

[8]  R. Shapley,et al.  A neuronal network model of macaque primary visual cortex (V1): orientation selectivity and dynamics in the input layer 4Calpha. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990 .

[10]  K. Aihara,et al.  12. Chaotic oscillations and bifurcations in squid giant axons , 1986 .

[11]  Germán Mato,et al.  On Numerical Simulations of Integrate-and-Fire Neural Networks , 1998, Neural Computation.

[12]  Kevin K. Lin,et al.  Entrainment and Chaos in a Pulse-Driven Hodgkin-Huxley Oscillator , 2005, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[13]  Leon O. Chua,et al.  Practical Numerical Algorithms for Chaotic Systems , 1989 .

[14]  Alain Destexhe,et al.  How much can we trust neural simulation strategies? , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[15]  A. Winfree The geometry of biological time , 1991 .

[16]  Christof Koch,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons (Computational Neuroscience Series) , 1998 .

[17]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  Chaos in the Hodgkin-Huxley Model , 2002, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[18]  F. A. Kröger Luminescence and absorption of zincsulfide, cadmiumsulfide and their solid solutions , 1940 .

[19]  Khashayar Pakdaman,et al.  An Analysis of the Reliability Phenomenon in the FitzHugh-Nagumo Model , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[20]  Hansel,et al.  Synchronization and computation in a chaotic neural network. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[21]  Michele Giugliano,et al.  Event-Driven Simulation of Spiking Neurons with , 2003 .

[22]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Chaos and synchrony in a model of a hypercolumn in visual cortex , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[23]  C. Koch,et al.  Methods in Neuronal Modeling: From Ions to Networks , 1998 .

[24]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[25]  Aaditya V. Rangan,et al.  Modeling the spatiotemporal cortical activity associated with the line-motion illusion in primary visual cortex. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Aaditya V. Rangan,et al.  Fast numerical methods for simulating large-scale integrate-and-fire neuronal networks , 2007, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[27]  Paolo Del Giudice,et al.  Efficient Event-Driven Simulation of Large Networks of Spiking Neurons and Dynamical Synapses , 2000, Neural Computation.

[28]  O. Prospero-Garcia,et al.  Reliability of Spike Timing in Neocortical Neurons , 1995 .

[29]  S. Nelson,et al.  An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex: Thalamocortical Input Tuning and Correlation-Based Intracortical Connectivity , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.