The Heritability of Attitude Toward Economic Risk

Abstract The propensity to take risk underpins a wide variety of decision-making behavior, ranging from common ones such as asking for directions and trying out a new restaurant to more substantial economic decisions involving, for instance, one's investment or career. Despite the fundamental role of risk attitude in the economy, its genetic basis remains unknown. Using an experimental economics protocol combined with a classical twin strategy, we provide the first direct evidence of the heritability of economic risk attitude, at 57%. We do not find a significant role for shared environmental effects, a common observation in behavioral genetics that is contrary to commonly held views in economics. Our findings complement recent neuroeconomic studies in enhancing the understanding of the neurobiological basis of risk taking.

[1]  R. Campbell,et al.  Social Mobility in Great Britain and the United States , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  E. Rowland.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[3]  Suzanne Scotchmer,et al.  On the Evolution of Attitudes towards Risk in Winner-Take-All Games , 1999 .

[4]  Peter K. Schott,et al.  How Basic Are Behavioral Biases? Evidence from Capuchin Monkey Trading Behavior , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Casey B. Mulligan,et al.  Parental Priorities and Economic Inequality , 1998 .

[6]  Arthur J. Robson,et al.  A Biological Basis for Expected and Non-expected Utility , 1996 .

[7]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human Decision-Making , 2005, Science.

[8]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[9]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Genetic Variation in Preferences for Giving and Risk Taking , 2009 .

[10]  Tyrone D. Cannon,et al.  Genetic influences on brain structure , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Heckman.  The Economics, Technology and Neuroscience of Human Capability Formation , 2007 .

[12]  A. Thapar,et al.  Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families , 1993 .

[13]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  Why the Apple Doesn't Fall Far: Understanding Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  S. Chew.  A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox , 1983 .

[15]  S. Israel,et al.  Individual differences in allocation of funds in the dictator game associated with length of the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor RS3 promoter region and correlation between RS3 length and hippocampal mRNA , 2008, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[16]  J. Quiggin.  A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[17]  H. Xian,et al.  Genetic Studies of Pathological Gambling: A Review of Methodology and Analyses of Data from the Vietnam Era Twin Registry , 2005, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[18]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[19]  Sabrina M. Tom,et al.  The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk , 2007, Science.

[20]  Eric Turkheimer,et al.  Three Laws of Behavior Genetics and What They Mean , 2000 .

[21]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[23]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  MIXTURE SYMMETRY AND QUADRATIC UTILITY , 1991 .

[24]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  C. Robert Cloninger.  A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. , 1987, Archives of general psychiatry.

[26]  D. Falconer.  Introduction to quantitative genetics. 1. ed. , 1984 .

[27]  D. Schmeidler,et al.  SELF-PRESERVATION AS A FOUNDATION OF RATIONAL BEHAVIOR UNDER RISK , 1986 .

[28]  M. Zuckerman.  The Shaping of Personality: Genes, Environments, and Chance Encounters , 2004, Journal of personality assessment.

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[30]  Itiel E. Dror,et al.  Age Differences in Decision Making: To Take a Risk or Not? , 1998, Gerontology.

[31]  D. Cohen,et al.  Reliably separating identical from fraternal twins. , 1975, Archives of general psychiatry.

[32]  Cloninger Cr.  A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. , 1987 .

[33]  Kip Smith,et al.  Neuronal substrates for choice under ambiguity, risk, gains, and losses , 2001, NeuroImage.

[34]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Aging and decision making: a comparison between neurologically healthy elderly and young individuals , 2005 .

[35]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[36]  Karl Wärneryd,et al.  Rent, risk, and replication: Preference adaptation in winner-take-all markets , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[37]  L. Friberg,et al.  Studies on similarity diagnosis in twins with the aid of mailed questionnaires. , 1961, Acta genetica et statistica medica.