Data management challenges in analysis and synthesis in the ecosystem sciences.

Open-data has created an unprecedented opportunity with new challenges for ecosystem scientists. Skills in data management are essential to acquire, manage, publish, access and re-use data. These skills span many disciplines and require trans-disciplinary collaboration. Science synthesis centres support analysis and synthesis through collaborative 'Working Groups' where domain specialists work together to synthesise existing information to provide insight into critical problems. The Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) served a wide range of stakeholders, from scientists to policy-makers to managers. This paper investigates the level of sophistication in data management in the ecosystem science community through the lens of the ACEAS experience, and identifies the important factors required to enable us to benefit from this new data-world and produce innovative science. ACEAS promoted the analysis and synthesis of data to solve transdisciplinary questions, and promoted the publication of the synthesised data. To do so, it provided support in many of the key skillsets required. Analysis and synthesis in multi-disciplinary and multi-organisational teams, and publishing data were new for most. Data were difficult to discover and access, and to make ready for analysis, largely due to lack of metadata. Data use and publication were hampered by concerns about data ownership and a desire for data citation. A web portal was created to visualise geospatial datasets to maximise data interpretation. By the end of the experience there was a significant increase in appreciation of the importance of a Data Management Plan. It is extremely doubtful that the work would have occurred or data delivered without the support of the Synthesis centre, as few of the participants had the necessary networks or skills. It is argued that participation in the Centre provided an important learning opportunity, and has resulted in improved knowledge and understanding of good data management practices.

[1]  Carly Strasser,et al.  Primer on Data Management: What you always wanted to know , 2012 .

[2]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[3]  D. Crane Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the "Invisible College" Hypothesis , 1969 .

[4]  James Udy,et al.  Unravelling complexity in seagrass systems for management: Australia as a microcosm. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Martin Rice,et al.  Spanning disciplinary, sectoral and international boundaries: a sea change towards transdisciplinary global environmental change research? , 2013 .

[6]  A. Budden,et al.  Big data and the future of ecology , 2013 .

[7]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Metacat: a schema-independent XML database system , 2001, Proceedings Thirteenth International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management. SSDBM 2001.

[8]  Matthias M. Boer,et al.  Fire regimes of Australia: a pyrogeographic model system , 2013 .

[9]  Michel Thibaudon,et al.  Trans-disciplinary research in synthesis of grass pollen aerobiology and its importance for respiratory health in Australasia. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology , 2011, Science.

[11]  O. J Reichman NCEAS: Promoting Creative Collaborations , 2004, PLoS biology.

[12]  Tony Hey,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm , 2009 .

[13]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  The New Bioinformatics: Integrating Ecological Data from the Gene to the Biosphere , 2006 .

[14]  Aaron M Ellison,et al.  Repeatability and transparency in ecological research. , 2010, Ecology.

[15]  D. Crane SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN A GROUP OF SCIENTISTS: A TEST OF THE “INVISIBLE COLLEGE” HYPOTHESIS* , 1977 .

[16]  Mark John Costello Motivating Online Publication of Data , 2009 .

[17]  Alice Lam,et al.  What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? , 2011 .

[18]  Neal D. Foster,et al.  Ecological monitoring to support Water Sharing Plan evaluation and protect wetlands of inland New South Wales, Australia , 2013 .

[19]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  Hunting Down the Chimera of Multiple Disciplinarity in Conservation Science , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  Ross Wilkinson,et al.  Sharing Australia's Nationally Significant Terrestrial Ecosystem Data: A Collaboration between TERN and ANDS , 2013, 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on e-Science.

[21]  M. Polk Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[22]  Debra P C Peters,et al.  Accessible ecology: synthesis of the long, deep, and broad. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Katie A. Barnas,et al.  Why is Data Sharing in Collaborative Natural Resource Efforts so Hard and What can We Do to Improve it? , 2014, Environmental Management.

[24]  Henry R. Hertzfeld,et al.  Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships , 2006 .

[25]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond the Data Deluge: A Research Agenda for Large-Scale Data Sharing and Reuse , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[26]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Knowledge sharing and trust in collaborative requirements analysis , 2008 .

[27]  V. Marx Biology: The big challenges of big data , 2013, Nature.

[28]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Participatory design of DataONE - Enabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences , 2012, Ecol. Informatics.

[29]  Essie Rodgers,et al.  Finding our way: On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  David A. Westcott,et al.  Finding Our Way , 2012 .

[31]  K. Cranston,et al.  Science Incubators: Synthesis Centers and Their Role in the Research Ecosystem , 2013, PLoS biology.

[32]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Accelerate Synthesis in Ecology and Environmental Sciences , 2009 .

[33]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  P. Pert,et al.  An online spatial database of Australian Indigenous Biocultural Knowledge for contemporary natural and cultural resource management. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  Michelle Ortlipp Keeping and Using Reflective Journals in the Qualitative Research Process. , 2008 .