Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior.

Previous research on organizational commitment has typically not focused on the underlying dimensions of psychological attachment to the organization. Results of two studies using university employees (N = 82) and students (N = 162) suggest that psychological attachment may be predicated on compliance, identification, and internalization (e.g., Kelman, 19S8). Identification and internalization are positively related to prosocial behaviors and negatively related to turnover. Internalization is predictive of financial donations to a fund-raising campaign. Overall, the results suggest the importance of clearly specifying the underlying dimensions of commitment using notions of psychological attachment and the various forms such attachment can take. In the past decade, the construct of organizational commitment has occupied a prominent place in organizational behavior research (Mowday, Porter, & Steers, 1982; Salancik, 1977; Staw & Ross, 1978). Unfortunately, as Morrow (1983, p. 486) has pointed out, "the growth in commitment related concepts has not been accompanied by a careful segmentation of commitment's theoretical domain in terms of intended meaning of each concept or the concepts' relationships among each other." By her count, there are over 25 commitment-related concepts and measures. Staw (1977), for instance, has noted that the value of commitment as a separate construct distinct from other psychological concepts such as motivation, involvement, or behavioral intention remains to be demonstrated. What is needed are theoretical and operational definitions that clearly differentiate commitment and its components from other re

[1]  E. Tolman.  Identification and the postwar world. , 1943 .

[2]  S. M. Stoke.  An inquiry into the concept of identification. , 1950, The Pedagogical seminary and journal of genetic psychology.

[3]  N SANFORD,et al.  The dynamics of identification. , 1955, Psychological review.

[4]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[5]  J. Kagan.  The concept of identification. , 1958, Psychological review.

[6]  H. Becker.  Notes on the Concept of Commitment , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. , 1962 .

[8]  D. Katz,et al.  The motivational basis of organizational behavior. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[9]  Michael E. Brown.  Identification and Some Conditions of Organizational Involvement , 1969 .

[10]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Personal factors in organizational identification. , 1970 .

[11]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Identification , 1971 .

[12]  M. E. Sheldon,et al.  Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the Organization , 1971 .

[13]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Correlates of organizational identification as a function of career pattern and organizational type. , 1972 .

[14]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[15]  Bruce Buchanan.  BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: THE SOCIALIZATION OF MANAGERS IN WORK ORGANIZATIONS , 1974 .

[16]  Allen I. Kraut,et al.  Predicting turnover of employees from measured job attitudes , 1975 .

[17]  O. Williamson.  Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[18]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  New Directions in Organizational Behavior , 1976 .

[19]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[20]  Richard M. Steers.  Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. , 1977, Administrative science quarterly.

[21]  A. Kidron,et al.  Work values and organizational commitment. , 1978, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[22]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment to a Policy Decision: A Multi-Theoretical Perspective. , 1978 .

[23]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[24]  R. Kanungo.  The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited. , 1979 .

[25]  S. Gould.  An Equity - Exchange Model Of Organizational Involvement , 1979 .

[26]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  Comparative examination of three approaches to the prediction of turnover. , 1979 .

[27]  W. Mobley,et al.  Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee Turnover Process , 1979 .

[28]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Effects of Job Alternatives, Extrinsic Rewards, and Behavioral Commitment on Attitude toward the Organization: A Field Test of the Insufficient Justification Paradigm. , 1980 .

[29]  M. Galanter,et al.  Psychological induction into the large-group: findings from a modern religious sect. , 1980, The American journal of psychiatry.

[30]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[31]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Job choice: The impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on subsequent satisfaction and commitment. , 1980 .

[32]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[33]  J. Perry,et al.  An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. , 1981 .

[34]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  The commitment and job tenure of new employees: Some evidence of postdecisional justification. , 1981 .

[35]  R. Scholl,et al.  Differentiating Organizational Commitment From Expectancy as a Motivating Force , 1981 .

[36]  Y. Wiener.  Commitment in Organizations: A Normative View , 1982 .

[37]  P. Morrow.  Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment , 1983 .

[38]  D. Caldwell,et al.  Responses to an organizational reward: A field test of the sufficiency of justification hypothesis. , 1983 .

[39]  Rosedith Sitgreaves Bowker.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences , 1983 .

[40]  C. Rusbult,et al.  A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Impact on Job Satisfaction, Job Commitment, and Turnover of Variations in Rewards, Costs, Alternatives, and Investments , 1983 .

[41]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Testing the "Side-Bet Theory" of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations , 1984 .

[42]  James D. Werbel,et al.  A comparison of the relationship of commitment to turnover in recent hires and tenured employees. , 1984 .

[43]  M. Diamond.  Organizational Identity , 1988 .