Threshold estimation in single photon emission computed tomography and planar imaging for clinical radioimmunotherapy.

Thresholding is the most widely used organ or tumor segmentation technique used in single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and planar imaging for monoclonal antibodies. Selecting the optimal threshold requires a priori knowledge (volumes from CT or magnetic resonance) for the size and contrast level of the organ in question. Failure to select an optimal threshold leads to overestimation or underestimation of the volume and, subsequently, the organ-absorbed dose value in radio-immunotherapy. To investigate this threshold selection problem, we performed a phantom experiment using six lucite spheres ranging from 1 to 117 ml and filled with a uniform activity of 1 microCi/ml Tc-99m. These spheres were placed at the center and off-center locations of a Jasczsak phantom and scanned with a three-headed gamma camera in SPECT and planar modes. Target-nontarget (T:NT) ratios were changed by adding the appropriate activity to the background. A threshold search algorithm with an interpolative background correction was applied to sphere images. This algorithm selects a threshold that minimizes the difference between the true and measured volumes (SPECT) or areas (planar). It was found that for spheres equal to or larger than 20 ml [diameter (D) > 38 mm] and T:NT ratios higher than 5:1, mean thresholds at 42% for SPECT and 38% for planar imaging yielded minimum image segmentation errors, which is in agreement with current literature. However, for small T:NT ratios (< 5:1), the threshold values as high as 71% for SPECT and 85% for planar imaging were substantially different than those fixed thresholds for large spheres (D > 38 mm). Hence, the use of fixed thresholds in low contrasts and with tumor and organ sizes of clinical interest (25 < or = D < or = 50 mm) may result in limited volume estimation accuracy. Therefore, we have provided the investigator a method to obtain the threshold values in which the proper threshold can be selected based on the organ and tumor size and image contrast. By measuring and calibrating the proper threshold value derived through machine-specific phantom measurements, a more accurate volume and activity quantitation can be performed. This, in turn, will provide tumor-absorbed dose optimization and greater accuracy in the measurement of potentially subacute, toxic absorbed doses to normal organs for patients undergoing radioimmunotherapy.

[1]  M L Goris,et al.  Interpolative background subtraction. , 1976, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  G. Sgouros,et al.  Quantitative SPECT in radiation dosimetry. , 1989, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[3]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Optimum processing protocols for volume determination of the liver and spleen from SPECT imaging with technetium-99m sulfur colloid. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  M A King,et al.  Comparative evaluation of image segmentation methods for volume quantitation in SPECT. , 1992, Medical physics.

[5]  W. N. Tauxe,et al.  Estimates of kidney volume by single photon emission tomography: A preliminary report , 1983, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Matt A. King,et al.  SPECT volume quantitation: influence of spatial resolution, source size and shape, and voxel size. , 1991, Medical physics.

[7]  Gerald L. DeNardo,et al.  Quantitative SPECT of uptake of monoclonal antibodies. , 1989, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[8]  W. N. Tauxe,et al.  Determination of organ volume by single-photon emission tomography. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  S. Ben-Haim,et al.  A practical SPECT technique for quantitation of drug delivery to human tumors and organ absorbed radiation dose. , 1989, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[10]  Lee-Tzuu Chang,et al.  A Method for Attenuation Correction in Radionuclide Computed Tomography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  P H Pretorius,et al.  Verification of a varying threshold edge detection SPECT technique for spleen volume: a comparison with computed tomography volumes. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  W. Hawkins,et al.  Quantitative SPECT for indium-111-labeled antibodies in the livers of beagle dogs. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  J. Bigger,et al.  Measurement of infarct size and percentage myocardium infarcted in a dog preparation with single photon-emission computed tomography, thallium-201, and indium 111-monoclonal antimyosin Fab. , 1987, Circulation.

[14]  N C Yang,et al.  Validation of the circular harmonic transform (CHT) algorithm for quantitative SPECT. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  H. Hoshi,et al.  Diagnosis of diffuse hepatocellular diseases using SPECT. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 1. Effect of Object Size , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  Steve Glickman Determination Of Organ Volume With S.P.E.C.T. , 1987, Medical Imaging.