Methanol steam reforming over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst: kinetics and effectiveness factor

Abstract Steam reforming of methanol over a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst was studied at atmospheric pressure and in a temperature range between 160 and 260 °C. The reaction rate depended upon methanol and hydrogen partial pressures, and was independent of the partial pressures of carbon oxides and water, which was in excess of the methanol partial pressure. Small amounts of carbon monoxide, less than 1% in the product gas, were formed at high temperatures; the amounts were well below the equilibrium amounts of reverse water–gas-shift reaction (RWGS). This was in support of the reaction sequence of methanol steam reforming followed by the RWGS. A power-law and a Langmuir–Hinselwood rate expression were developed for the reforming reaction by fitting the expressions to the experimental data. As the data were found to be affected by internal diffusion at high temperatures, the effectiveness factor of the catalyst particle was estimated in the fitting in order to obtain the intrinsic kinetics. Details of the estimation of the factor are elucidated. In order to predict a non-zero, finite rate in the absence of hydrogen, the hydrogen partial pressure term in the power-law expression was corrected by a fitted constant to avoid an infinite reaction rate, since the exponent of the hydrogen partial pressure was a negative number due to the hydrogen inhibition effect in the reforming; in the reaction mechanism for the Langmuir–Hinselwood expression, it was necessary to assume two different kinds of active sites on the catalyst: one for adsorbed methoxy and the other for adsorbed hydrogen. In addition, an excellent fitting of the data by the Langmuir–Hinselwood expression indicates that dehydrogenation of the adsorbed methoxy to the adsorbed oxymethylene is the rate-determining step (RDS), and that adsorption of all the species other than methoxy and hydrogen on the active sites is negligible.

[1]  D. Trimm,et al.  Kinetic study of steam reforming of methanol over copper-based catalysts , 1993 .

[2]  Julian R.H. Ross,et al.  Methanol reforming for fuel-cell applications: development of zirconia-containing Cu–Zn–Al catalysts , 1999 .

[3]  J. Skrzypek,et al.  Adsorption model of methanol synthesis reactants on CuOZnOAl2O3 catalyst—III. Co-adsorption effects , 1991 .

[4]  E. Santacesaria,et al.  Kinetics of catalytic steam reforming of methanol in a cstr reactor , 1983 .

[5]  Bernd Emonts,et al.  Methanol steam reforming in a fuel cell drive system , 1999 .

[6]  J. Mize Optimization Techniques With Fortran , 1973 .

[7]  Robert Schlögl,et al.  CO Formation/Selectivity for steam reforming of methanol with a commercial CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst , 2004 .

[8]  B. Höhlein,et al.  Fuel cell drive system with hydrogen generation in test , 2000 .

[9]  J. C. Amphlett,et al.  Hydrogen production by the catalytic steam reforming of methanol: Part 2: Kinetics of methanol decomposition using girdler G66B catalyst , 1985 .

[10]  V. Formanski,et al.  Compact hydrogen production systems for solid polymer fuel cells , 1998 .

[11]  Z. Önsan,et al.  On-Board Hydrogen Generation for Fuel Cell-Powered Vehicles: The Use of Methanol and Propane , 2003 .

[12]  H. S. Fogler,et al.  Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1986 .

[13]  Dong Hyun Kim,et al.  A CuO-CeO2 Mixed-Oxide Catalyst for CO Clean-Up by Selective Oxidation in Hydrogen-Rich Mixtures , 2003 .

[14]  A. Wokaun,et al.  Autothermal methanol reforming for hydrogen production in fuel cell applications , 2001 .

[15]  Brant A. Peppley,et al.  Methanol–steam reforming on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts. Part 2. A comprehensive kinetic model , 1999 .

[16]  Seok-Min Lee,et al.  Metal membrane-type 25-kW methanol fuel processor for fuel-cell hybrid vehicle , 2002 .

[17]  N. Takezawa,et al.  The mechanism of steam reforming of methanol over a copper-silica catalyst , 1982 .

[18]  Development of 10-kWe preferential oxidation system for fuel cell vehicles , 2002 .

[19]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen Conversion of hydrocarbons and alcohols for fuel cells , 2001 .

[20]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[21]  S. Mukerjee,et al.  Electrocatalysis of reformate tolerance in proton exchange membranes fuel cells: Part I , 2003 .

[22]  Mark S. Wainwright,et al.  KINETIC MECHANISM FOR THE REACTION BETWEEN METHANOL AND WATER OVER A CU-ZNO-AL2O3 CATALYST , 1993 .

[23]  Dong Hyun Kim,et al.  A robust iterative method of computing effectiveness factors in porous catalysts , 2004 .

[24]  H. Livbjerg,et al.  Models of pore diffusion in porous catalysts , 1998 .

[25]  Henrik Birgersson,et al.  Steam reforming of methanol over a Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst : a kinetic analysis and strategies for suppression of CO formation , 2002 .

[26]  R. Idem,et al.  Kinetic modeling of the production of hydrogen from the methanol-steam reforming process over Mn-promoted coprecipitated Cu-Al catalyst , 1996 .

[27]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Development of a methanol fuelled reformer for fuel cell applications , 2003 .

[28]  W. E. Stewart,et al.  Practical Models for Isothermal Diffusion and Flow of Gases in Porous Solids , 1973 .

[29]  Dong Hyun Kim,et al.  Kinetics of selective CO oxidation in hydrogen-rich mixtures on Pt/alumina catalysts , 2002 .

[30]  B. Höhlein,et al.  Investigation of a methanol reformer concept considering the particular impact of dynamics and long-term stability for use in a fuel-cell-powered passenger car , 2000 .

[31]  N. Iwasa,et al.  Steam reforming and dehydrogenation of methanol: Difference in the catalytic functions of copper and group VIII metals , 1997 .

[32]  Robert F. Savinell,et al.  Kinetics of methanol-steam reformation in an internal reforming fuel cell , 2002 .