Structural Contingency Theory: A Multivariate Test

This paper reconsiders structural contingency theory. It presents a discussion of the methodological underpinnings which surround the research activities of this theory. Two research strategies are reviewed. They entail a multivariate examination of the structure-environment-effectiveness relationship. One of these strategies examines deviations from ideal structural profiles, while the second one involves a canonical correlation analysis between structural and environmental attributes for low and high effectiveness units. The results from field research in a commercial bank are used to illustrate the two analysis strategies. They indicate that effective organizational units show strong structure-environment interrelationships and lead one to conclude that there are indeed effectiveness-induced constraints on the choice of an organization's design or its environment. The methodological and conceptual implications of the findings are then discussed.

[1]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[2]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[3]  L. G. Hrebiniak,et al.  Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism. , 1985 .

[4]  J. Langton.  The Ecological Theory of Bureaucracy: The Case of Josiah Wedgwood and the British Pottery Industry , 1984 .

[5]  H. K. Downey,et al.  Cognitive and Organizational Structures: A Conceptual Analysis of Implicit Organizing Theories , 1983 .

[6]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. , 1983 .

[7]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Explaining Organization Behavior , 1983 .

[8]  L. Donaldson.  Comments on 'Contingency and Choice in Organization Theory' (Georg Schreyögg, OS 1/4: 305-326) , 1982 .

[9]  Georg Schreyögg.  Some Comments About Comments: A Reply to Donaldson , 1982 .

[10]  J. Pfeffer.  Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[11]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[12]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Contingency and Choice in Organization Theory , 1980 .

[13]  B. Schneider.  Employee and Customer Perceptions of Service in Banks. , 1980 .

[14]  J. Werbel,et al.  Universalistic and Contingency Predictions of Employee Satisfaction and Conflict. , 1979 .

[15]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[16]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  J. Pennings.  The Relevance of the Structural-Contingency Model for Organizational Effectiveness. , 1975 .

[18]  J. Child.  MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE‐PART II. A CONTINGENCY ANALYSIS , 1975 .

[19]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[20]  J. L. Price.  Handbook of Organizational Measurement , 1975 .

[21]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[22]  W. Dill.  Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy , 1958 .