Origin and Evolution of the Secant Method in One Dimension

Abstract Many in the mathematical community believe that the secant method arose from Newton's method using a finite difference approximation to the derivative, most likely because that is the way that it is taught in contemporary texts. However, we were able to trace the origin of the secant method all the way back to the Rule of Double False Position described in the 18th-century b.c. Egyptian Rhind Papyrus, by showing that the Rule of Double False Position coincides with the secant method applied to a linear equation. As such, it predates Newton's method by more than 3,000 years. In this paper, we recount the evolution of the Rule of Double False Position as it spanned many civilizations over the centuries leading to what we view today as the contemporary secant method. Unfortunately, throughout history naming confusion has surrounded the Rule of Double False Position. This naming confusion was primarily a product of the last 500 years or so and became particularly troublesome in the past 50 years, creating confusion in the use of the terms Double False Position method, Regula Falsi method, and secant method. We elaborate on this confusion and clarify the names used.

[1]  D. Melville,et al.  Mathematics in Ancient Iraq : A Social History , 2009 .

[2]  Martin Andrew Nordgaard A Historical Survey of Algebraic Methods of Approximating the Roots of Numerical Higher Equations Up to the Year 1819 , 2008 .

[3]  James V. Rauff Math through the Ages: A Gentle History for Teachers and Others (Expanded Edition) , 2005 .

[4]  Serafina Cuomo,et al.  Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci: A Translation into Modern English of Leonardo Pisano’s Book of Calculation , 2003 .

[5]  Laurence Sigler,et al.  Fibonacci's Liber abaci , 2002 .

[6]  Frank Swetz,et al.  The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art Companion and Commentary , 2001 .

[7]  Jean-Luc Chabert,et al.  A history of algorithms: from the pebble to the microchip , 1999 .

[8]  Gary J. Bronson C++ for Engineers and Scientists , 1998 .

[9]  Jens Høyrup Algebra and Naive Geometry. An Investigation of Some Basic Aspects of Old Babylonian Mathematical Thought I , 1990 .

[10]  J. Høyrup Algebra and Naive Geometry. An Investigation of Some Basic Aspects of Old Babylonian Mathematical Thought I , 1987 .

[11]  Graham Flegg,et al.  Nicolas Chuquet, Renaissance mathematician , 1984 .

[12]  高等学校計算数学学報編輯委員会編 高等学校計算数学学報 = Numerical mathematics , 1979 .

[13]  D. T. Whiteside,et al.  The mathematical papers of Isaac Newton , 1967 .

[14]  R. Stanton,et al.  Numerical methods for science and engineering , 1962 .

[15]  T. A. Jeeves Secant modification of Newton's method , 1958, CACM.

[16]  Joseph Henry Wegstein,et al.  Accelerating convergence of iterative processes , 1958, CACM.

[17]  A. Booth Numerical Methods , 1957, Nature.

[18]  P. Morse,et al.  Principles of Numerical Analysis , 1954 .

[19]  Geschichte der Mathematik , 1953 .

[20]  Friedrich Adolf Willers,et al.  Practical analysis : graphical and numerical methods , 1948 .

[21]  R. W. Sloley Mathematical Cuneiform Texts , 1946, Nature.

[22]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[23]  R. C. Archibald,et al.  The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus , 1930, The Mathematical Gazette.

[24]  Charles Cameron Donald Shute The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus , 1926 .