Effort: The Double-Edged Sword in School Achievement.

Self-worth theory suggests that teachers and students often operate at crosspurposes: Teachers encourage achievement through effort, yet many students attempt to avoid the implication that they lack ability by not trying. To test these assertions undergraduates rated their affective reactions to hypothetical test failures under conditions of high or low effort and in the presence or absence of self-serving excuses. Then, in the role of teachers, they administered punishment to hypothetical students under the same failure conditions. Results indicated that inability attributions and negative affect were greatest when failure followed much effort. Conversely, failure reflected less on ability, and shame was correspondingly reduced when students studied little—the same failure condition that subjects, in the role of teachers, punished most severely. The virtues of hard work have long been extolled in America. Nowhere is this truer than in our schools, where it is widely held among educators and parents alike that while not all students are brilliant, at least everyone can try. The paramount importance of such a work ethic in the teacher's system of values has recently been demonstrated (see Weiner, 1972, 1974). In the typical procedure, teachers are asked to reward and punish a group of hypothetical students of varying ability levels (either high or low) for test performances that range from excellent to clear failure. These students also differ in the amount of effort they expend in preparing for the test (either high or low). While the results indicate that test outcome is the major determinant of classroom evaluation, teachers also reinforce effort. Students who are perceived as having expended effort are rewarded more in success and punished less in failure than those who do not try. Moreover, these evaluative reactions appear to be largely independent of student ability level. These same general results have been obtained repeatedly by investigators using various subject popula

[1]  R. Beery,et al.  Fear of Failure in the Student Experience. , 1975 .

[2]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[3]  S. Epstein.  The self-concept revisited. Or a theory of a theory. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[4]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations , 1976 .

[5]  B. Weiner.  Theories of motivation : from mechanism to cognition , 1972 .

[6]  C. Dweck,et al.  Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children , 1973 .

[7]  H. Sigall,et al.  The effects of self-esteem and evaluator demandingness on effort expenditure. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  O. D. Duncan.  Path Analysis: Sociological Examples , 1966, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[10]  H. S. Eswara.  Cross-Cultural Notes Administration of Reward and Punishment in Relation to Ability, Effort, and Performance , 1972 .

[11]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[12]  L. A. Marascuilo,et al.  Appropriate Post Hoc Comparisons for Interaction and Nested Hypotheses in Analysis of Variance Designs: The Elimination of Type IV Errors1 , 1970 .

[13]  Egotism and attribution. , 1976 .

[14]  B. Weiner,et al.  An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. , 1970 .

[15]  N. Feather.  Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance. , 1969 .

[16]  C. Dweck,et al.  Expectancy statements as determinants of reactions to failure: Sex differences in persistence and expectancy change. , 1975 .

[17]  N. Feather,et al.  Causal attributions for success and failure in relation to expectations of success based upon selective or manipulative control , 1971 .

[18]  Martin V. Covington,et al.  Self-worth and school learning , 1976 .

[19]  John W. Gardner,et al.  Excellence: Can We Be Equal and Excellent Too? , 1961 .

[20]  B. Weiner.  Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory , 1974 .

[21]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Sex Differences in Learned Helplessness: I. Differential Debilitation with Peer and Adult Evaluators. , 1976 .

[22]  S. Streufert,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE, FAILURE, AND SUCCESS ON ATTRIBUTION OF CAUSALITY AND INTERPERSONAL ATTITUDES. , 1969 .

[23]  William C. House,et al.  Valence of expected and unexpected outcomes as a function of locus of goal and type of expectancy. , 1974 .

[24]  W. Stephan,et al.  Egotism in males and females. , 1976 .

[25]  S. Rest.  Further Evidence Concerning the Effects of Perceptions of Effort and Ability on Achievement Evaluation. , 1973 .

[26]  H. Kelley.  Causal schemata and the attribution process , 1972 .

[27]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF MOTIVE ACQUISITION. , 1965, The American psychologist.

[28]  B. Weiner,et al.  Necessary versus Sufficient Causal Schemata for Success and Failure. , 1973 .

[29]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  The Simultaneous Investigation of Interaction and Nested Hypotheses in Two-Factor Analysis of Variance Designs , 1976 .

[30]  John G. Nicholls,et al.  Effort is virtuous, but it's better to have ability: Evaluative responses to perceptions of effort and ability , 1976 .

[31]  R. Debus,et al.  Persistence and the Causal Perception of Failure: Modifying Cognitive Attributions. , 1978 .

[32]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Seeking information about one's ability as a determinant of choice among tasks , 1975 .

[33]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[34]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Effects of cooperation and competition on responsibility attribution after success and failure , 1973 .

[35]  C. Dweck.  The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. , 1975 .

[36]  Richard deCharms,et al.  Personal Causation Training in the Schools1 , 1972 .

[37]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on attributions of causality. , 1974 .

[38]  John G. Nicholls,et al.  Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex. , 1975 .

[39]  B. Weiner,et al.  Causal ascriptions and achievement behavior: a conceptual analysis of effort and reanalysis of locus of control. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Fritz Heider,et al.  Social perception and phenomenal causality. , 1944 .

[41]  K. Deaux,et al.  Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. , 1974 .

[42]  R. Teevan,et al.  Fear of Failure , 1969 .

[43]  R. Fuller,et al.  Attributed pride or shame in group and self. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[45]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[46]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Difficulty and diagnosticity as determinants of choice among tasks. , 1975 .

[47]  D. Sohn.  Affect-generating powers of effort and ability self attributions of academic success and failure. , 1977, Journal of educational psychology.

[48]  N. Feather,et al.  Attribution of responsibility and valence of outcome in relation to initial confidence and success and failure of self and other , 1971 .

[49]  E. E. Jones,et al.  DRUG CHOICE AS A SELF-HANDICAPPING STRATEGY IN RESPONSE TO NONCONTINGENT SUCCESS , 1978 .

[50]  B. Weiner.  Attribution and affect: comments on Sohn's critique. , 1977, Journal of educational psychology.

[51]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[52]  D. Dyck,et al.  Persistence in children's reading behavior as a function of N length and attribution retraining. , 1976 .

[53]  W. Brookover,et al.  Self-Concept of Ability and School Achievement , 1964 .