Image derived input functions for dynamic High Resolution Research Tomograph PET brain studies

The High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) is a dedicated human brain positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. The aim of the present study was to validate the use of image derived input functions (IDIF) as an alternative for arterial sampling for HRRT human brain studies. To this end, IDIFs were extracted from 3D ordinary Poisson ordered subsets expectation maximization (OP-OSEM) and reconstruction based partial volume corrected (PVC) OP-OSEM images. IDIFs, either derived directly from regions of interest or further calibrated using manual samples taken during scans, were evaluated for dynamic [(11)C]flumazenil data (n=6). Results obtained with IDIFs were compared with those obtained using blood sampler input functions (BSIF). These comparisons included areas under the curve (AUC) for peak (0-3.3 min) and tail (3.3-55.0 min). In addition, slope, intercept and Pearson's correlation coefficient of tracer kinetic analysis results based on IDIF and BSIF were calculated for each subject. Good peak AUC ratios (0.83+/-0.21) between IDIF and BSIF were found for calibrated IDIFs extracted from OP-OSEM images. This combination of IDIFs and images also provided good slope values (1.07+/-0.11). Improved resolution, as obtained with PVC OP-OSEM, changed AUC ratios to 1.14+/-0.35 and, for tracer kinetic analysis, slopes changed to 0.95+/-0.13. For all reconstructions, non-calibrated IDIFs gave poorer results (>61+/-34% higher slopes) compared with calibrated IDIFs. The results of this study indicate that the use of IDIFs, extracted from OP-OSEM or PVC OP-OSEM images, is feasible for dynamic HRRT data, thereby obviating the need for online arterial sampling.

[1]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Evaluation of Basis Function and Linear Least Squares Methods for Generating Parametric Blood Flow Images Using 15O-Water and Positron Emission Tomography , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[3]  Vincent J. Cunningham,et al.  Parametric Imaging of Ligand-Receptor Binding in PET Using a Simplified Reference Region Model , 1997, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Teras,et al.  Quantitative brain imaging using the new, fast iterative histogram-mode reconstruction for the HRRT PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[5]  E. Hoffman,et al.  3-D phantom to simulate cerebral blood flow and metabolic images for PET , 1990 .

[6]  Scott E Kasner,et al.  Carotid Artery Diameter in Men and Women and the Relation to Body and Neck Size , 2006, Stroke.

[7]  H.W.A.M. de Jong,et al.  Quantitative Experimental Comparison of HRRT versus HR+ PET Brain Studies , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[8]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Characteristics of a new fully programmable blood sampling device for monitoring blood radioactivity during PET , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  C. Comtat,et al.  OSEM-3D reconstruction strategies for the ECAT HRRT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[10]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Variance reduction on randoms from coincidence histograms for the HRRT , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[11]  Z. Burbar,et al.  Evaluation of single photon transmission for the HRRT , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[12]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  PPET: A software tool for kinetic and parametric analyses of dynamic PET studies , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Comparison of 3D-OP-OSEM and 3D-FBP reconstruction algorithms for High-Resolution Research Tomograph studies: effects of randoms estimation methods , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  G Brix,et al.  Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Impact of Image-Space Resolution Modeling for Studies with the High-Resolution Research Tomograph , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  J. Logan Graphical analysis of PET data applied to reversible and irreversible tracers. , 1999, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[17]  C. Knoess,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: NEMA NEC evaluation of the HRRT system, the new High Resolution Research Tomograph , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[18]  D J Brooks,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Analysis of Clinical [11C]Raclopride Studies , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[19]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  Roger N. Gunn,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modeling of the 5-HT1AReceptor Ligand [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 for PET , 1998, NeuroImage.

[22]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Variance Reduction on Randoms from delayed coincidence histograms for the HRRT , 2005 .

[23]  C. Knoess,et al.  Derivation of the input function from dynamic PET images with the HRRT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[24]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Reducing loss of image quality because of the attenuation artifact in uncorrected PET whole-body images. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Partial volume corrected image derived input functions for dynamic PET brain studies: Methodology and validation for [11C]flumazenil , 2008, NeuroImage.