Application of a cluster‐bootstrapping method for identifying the dietary patterns of fish populations

Dietary data usually exhibit considerable statistical awkwardness and the analytical techniques commonly used in the study of fish diet suffer from various problems (especially at the intraspecific and intrapopulation levels) resulting from difficulties in group definition and pooling of data. Considering that, we advocate the use of a combination of cluster analysis and bootstrapping to identify statistically significant groups of individual predators. Both basic and extended versions of the procedure (yielding slightly different results) are outlined. We also suggest the use of detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) for further interpretation of significant clusters. When applied to dietary data from a brown trout population, the method successfully finds different feeding patterns, even though possible sources (geographical and temporal) of dietary variation were very limited. Dietary patterns appear to be related to the seasonal dynamics of the prey community coupled with seasonal shifts in microhabitat use by the predator; and, in a finer time-scale, to diel macroinvertebrate drift periodicity or interindividual, size-related differences in preyhandling capabilities.

[1]  L. Lawlor,et al.  Overlap, Similarity, and Competition Coefficients , 1980 .

[2]  J. S. Rogers,et al.  A Discriminant Functions Analysis of Sunfish (Lepomis) Food Habits and Feeding Niche Segregation in the Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana Estuary , 1978 .

[3]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  Detrended Correspondence Analysis of Dietary Data , 1988 .

[4]  J. Allan.  Determinants of Diet of Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in a Mountain Stream , 1981 .

[5]  N. Ringler,et al.  Optimal prey size for stream resident brown trout (Salmo trutta): tests of predictive models , 1986 .

[6]  R. Knox,et al.  Putting Things in Order: The Advantages of Detrended Correspondence Analysis , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. S. Griffith,et al.  Diel Feeding Chronology and Diet Selection of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Henry's Fork of the Snake River, Idaho , 1990 .

[8]  P. Maitland.  The Feeding Relationships of Salmon, Trout, Minnows, Stone Loach and Three-Spined Stickle-Backs in the River Endrick, Scotland , 1965 .

[9]  S. Ferson,et al.  Putting Things in Order: A Critique of Detrended Correspondence Analysis , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Richard E. Struass.  Statistical Significance of Species Clusters in Association Analysis , 1982 .

[11]  G. W. Hughes.  The comparative ecology and evidence for resource partitioning in two pholidid fishes (Pisces: Pholididae) from southern British Columbia eelgrass beds , 1985 .

[12]  S. Thorman.  Food and habitat resource partitioning between three estuarine fish species on the Swedish west coast , 1983 .

[13]  Charles E. McCulloch,et al.  MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS: PANACEA OR PANDORA'S BOX? , 1990 .

[14]  C. Otto,et al.  THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CASE MATERIAL SELECTION FOR THE SURVIVAL OF CADDIS LARVAE , 1980 .

[15]  J. M. Elliott.  The Food of Trout (Salmo trutta) in a Dartmoor Stream , 1967 .

[16]  A. Baker,et al.  Morphometric Variation in Introduced Populations of the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis): An Application of the Jackknife to Principal Component Analysis , 1984 .

[17]  K. Fausch,et al.  Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain , 1984 .

[18]  J. M. Elliott,et al.  Rates of gastric evacuation in brown trout, Salmo trutta L. , 1972 .

[19]  T. Schoener,et al.  Some Methods for Calculating Competition Coefficients from Resource-Utilization Spectra , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Constraints on prey size selection by the three‐spined stickleback: energy requirements and the capacity and fullness of the gut , 1992 .

[21]  E. Hyslop.  Stomach contents analysis—a review of methods and their application , 1980 .

[22]  J. Hislop,et al.  The food of five gadoid species during the pelagic O-group phase in the northern North Sea , 1980 .

[23]  Hynes H.B.N..  THE FOOD OF THE FRESHWATER STICKLEBACKS (GASTEROSTEUS ACULIEATUS AND PYGOSTEUS PUNGITIUS) WITH A REVIEW OF METHODS USED N THE STUDIES OF THE FOOD OF FISHES , 1950 .

[24]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  Putting Things in Order: The Ups and Downs of Detrended Correspondence Analysis , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[25]  E. Pianka.  The structure of lizard communities , 1973 .