Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument

Background Patients attend primary care for many reasons and to achieve a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) designed to capture these diverse outcomes, and trials of interventions in primary care may thus fail to detect beneficial effects. Aim This study describes the psychometric testing of the Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ), which was designed to capture a broad range of outcomes relevant to primary care. Design and setting Questionnaires were administered in primary care in South West England. Method Patients completed the PCOQ in GP waiting rooms before a consultation, and a second questionnaire, including the PCOQ and seven comparator PROMs, after 1 week. Psychometric testing included exploratory factor analysis on the PCOQ, internal consistency, correlation coefficients between domain scores and comparator measures, and repeated measures effect sizes indicating change across 1 week. Results In total, 602 patients completed the PCOQ at baseline, and 264 (44%) returned the follow-up questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis suggested four dimensions underlying the PCOQ items: health and wellbeing, health knowledge and self-care, confidence in health provision, and confidence in health plan. Each dimension was internally consistent and correlated as expected with comparator PROMs, providing evidence of construct validity. Patients reporting an improvement in their main problem exhibited small to moderate improvements in relevant domain scores on the PCOQ. Conclusion The PCOQ was acceptable, feasible, showed strong psychometric properties, and was responsive to change. It is a promising new tool for assessment of outcomes of primary care interventions from a patient perspective.

[1]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Qualitative assessment of the primary care outcomes questionnaire: a cognitive interview study , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[2]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14 , 2016, The Lancet.

[3]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  What Happens After Health Coaching? Observational Study 1 Year Following a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2016, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[4]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Agreeing the content of a patient‐reported outcome measure for primary care: a Delphi consensus study , 2016, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[5]  Robert Aseltine,et al.  Electronic Consultations to Improve the Primary Care-Specialty Care Interface for Cardiology in the Medically Underserved: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial , 2016, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[6]  C. Hudon,et al.  Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services With Chronic Diseases: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Family Experience , 2015, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[7]  K. Turner,et al.  Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study , 2015, BMC Family Practice.

[8]  K. Volpp,et al.  Effects of a Medical Home and Shared Savings Intervention on Quality and Utilization of Care. , 2015, JAMA internal medicine.

[9]  G. Jackson,et al.  Does PCMH "Work"?--The Need to Use Implementation Science to Make Sense of Conflicting Results. , 2015, JAMA internal medicine.

[10]  N. Britten,et al.  Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[11]  T. Blakeman,et al.  The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings. , 2013, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[12]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Do men consult less than women? An analysis of routinely collected UK general practice data , 2013, BMJ Open.

[13]  Martin Roland,et al.  Factors affecting patients’ trust and confidence in GPs: evidence from the English national GP patient survey , 2013, BMJ Open.

[14]  Nick Black,et al.  Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare , 2013, BMJ.

[15]  L. McLeod,et al.  ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[16]  S. Wyke,et al.  Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study , 2012, The Lancet.

[17]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Using health status to measure NHS performance: another step into the dark for the health reform in England , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[18]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[19]  C. Terwee,et al.  The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Do walk-in centres for commuters work? A mixed methods evaluation. , 2009, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[21]  Jennifer Prah Ruger,et al.  Health capability: conceptualization and operationalization. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[22]  Peter Bower,et al.  The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK – development and psychometric characteristics , 2009, BMC family practice.

[23]  C. Maher,et al.  Global Rating of Change Scales: A Review of Strengths and Weaknesses and Considerations for Design , 2009, The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy.

[24]  K. Stange,et al.  Quality in primary health care: a multidimensional approach to complexity , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Does Advanced Access improve access to primary health care? Questionnaire survey of patients. , 2007, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[26]  T. Mills,et al.  Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires , 2006 .

[27]  Elizabeth Broadbent,et al.  The brief illness perception questionnaire. , 2006, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[28]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. , 2005, Health services research.

[29]  Martin Fortin,et al.  Prevalence of Multimorbidity Among Adults Seen in Family Practice , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[30]  B. Leese,et al.  Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  L. Potvin,et al.  Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit. , 2000, Family practice.

[32]  G. Freeman,et al.  Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey , 1999, BMJ.

[33]  R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.

[34]  C. Paterson Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey , 1996, BMJ.

[35]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[36]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[37]  H. Hansluwka Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales: by Ann Bowling , 1992 .

[38]  Ralf Dresner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales A Practical Guide To Their Development And Use , 2016 .

[39]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[40]  J. Valderas,et al.  Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. , 2011, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[41]  C. Terwee,et al.  The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness , 2011 .

[42]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[43]  Jordi Alonso,et al.  The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.