Rapid simulated hydrologic response within the variably saturated near surface

Column and field experiments have shown that the hydrologic response to increases in rainfall rates can be more rapid than expected from simple estimates. Physics-based hydrologic response simulation, with the Integrated Hydrology Model (InHM), is used here to investigate rapid hydrologic response, within the variably saturated near surface, to temporal variations in applied flux at the surface boundary. The factors controlling the speed of wetting front propagation are discussed within the Darcy-Buckingham conceptual framework, including kinematic wave approximations. The Coos Bay boundary-value problem is employed to examine simulated discharge, pressure head, and saturation responses to a large increase in applied surface flux. The results presented here suggest that physics-based simulations are capable of representing rapid hydrologic response within the variably saturated near surface. The new InHM simulations indicate that the temporal discretization and measurement precision needed to capture the rapid subsurface response to a spike increase in surface flux, necessary for both data-based analyses and evaluation of physics-based models, are smaller than the capabilities of the instrumentation deployed at the Coos Bay experimental catchment.

[1]  J. Vanderkwaak.  Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems , 1999 .

[2]  K. Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils , 1982 .

[3]  Keith Loague,et al.  Physics‐based hydrologic‐response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality , 2006 .

[4]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  Piezometric response in shallow bedrock at CB1: Implications for runoff generation and landsliding , 2002 .

[5]  Kelsey J. Sinclair,et al.  The use of stream flow routing for direct channel precipitation with isotopically-based hydrograph separations: the role of new water in stormflow generation , 2003 .

[6]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Runoff generation in a steep, soil‐mantled landscape , 2002 .

[7]  S. Colbeck,et al.  A Theory of Water Percolation in Snow , 1972, Journal of Glaciology.

[8]  R. Torres.  A threshold condition for soil‐water transport , 2002 .

[9]  K. Beven.  Kinematic subsurface stormflow , 1981 .

[10]  R. Carsel,et al.  Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[11]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  Physics‐based continuous simulation of long‐term near‐surface hydrologic response for the Coos Bay experimental catchment , 2007 .

[12]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Infiltration Theory for Hydrologic Applications , 2002 .

[13]  Qihua Ran,et al.  Adding sediment transport to the integrated hydrology model (InHM): Development and testing , 2006 .

[14]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Linkages Between Weathering and Erosion in a Small, Steep Catchment , 2002 .

[15]  Michael A. Celia,et al.  Pore‐scale modeling extension of constitutive relationships in the range of residual saturations , 2001 .

[16]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Unsaturated zone processes and the hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1998 .

[17]  Keith Loague,et al.  Further testing of the Integrated Hydrology Model (InHM): event‐based simulations for a small rangeland catchment located near Chickasha, Oklahoma , 2005 .

[18]  James W. Kirchner,et al.  The fine structure of water‐quality dynamics: the (high‐frequency) wave of the future , 2004 .

[19]  Brian D. Smerdon,et al.  Simulations of fully coupled lake‐groundwater exchange in a subhumid climate with an integrated hydrologic model , 2007 .

[20]  Keith Loague,et al.  Long‐term InHM simulations of hydrologic response and sediment transport for the R‐5 catchment , 2007 .

[21]  Keith Beven,et al.  Robert E. Horton's perceptual model of infiltration processes , 2004 .

[22]  R. Horton.  An Approach Toward a Physical Interpretation of Infiltration-Capacity1 , 1941 .

[23]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 2. Physics-based simulations , 2007, American Journal of Science.

[24]  H. J. Morel-Seytoux,et al.  Unsaturated flow in hydrologic modeling. Theory and practice. , 1989 .

[25]  K. Loague,et al.  Hydrologic‐Response simulations for the R‐5 catchment with a comprehensive physics‐based model , 2001 .

[26]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall , 1997 .

[27]  Roger E. Smith.  Approximate Soil Water Movement by Kinematic Characteristics1 , 1983 .

[28]  Randall J. Charbeneau,et al.  Kinematic Models for Soil Moisture and Solute Transport , 1984 .

[29]  K. Loague,et al.  Physics‐based hydrologic response simulation: platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool , 2004 .

[30]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[31]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 1. sprinkling experiments , 2007, American Journal of Science.

[32]  Young-Jin Park,et al.  An assessment of the tracer‐based approach to quantifying groundwater contributions to streamflow , 2006 .

[33]  J. W. Biggar,et al.  Simultaneous Solute and Water Transfer for an Unsaturated Soil , 1971 .

[34]  Matthias Steiner,et al.  Challenges in obtaining reliable measurements of point rainfall , 2007 .

[35]  Michael A. Celia,et al.  Dynamic Effect in the Capillary Pressure–Saturation Relationship and its Impacts on Unsaturated Flow , 2002 .

[36]  Todd C. Rasmussen,et al.  Tracer vs. pressure wave velocities through unsaturated saprolite , 2000 .

[37]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Chemical weathering and runoff chemistry in a steep headwater catchment , 2001 .

[38]  Qihua Ran,et al.  Further testing of the integrated hydrology model (InHM): multiple‐species sediment transport , 2007 .

[39]  J. Anderson,et al.  The influence of grazing on vegetation, soil properties and stream discharge in a small Dartmoor catchment, southwest England, UK , 2006 .

[40]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1997 .

[41]  K. Beven.  On subsurface stormflow: Predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows , 1982 .

[42]  Benjamin B. Mirus,et al.  Physics‐based hydrologic‐response simulation: foundation for hydroecology and hydrogeomorphology , 2006 .

[43]  John F. Dowd,et al.  A new interpretation of kinematic stormflow generation , 2002 .

[44]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[45]  Benjamin B. Mirus,et al.  Simulated effect of a forest road on near‐surface hydrologic response: redux , 2005 .

[46]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Concentration‐discharge relationships in runoff from a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1997 .

[47]  J. Nimmo.  Simple predictions of maximum transport rate in unsaturated soil and rock , 2007 .

[48]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .