Towards subjective quality assessment of point cloud imaging in augmented reality

Recently, there has been an increased interest in capture, processing and rendering of visual content in form of point clouds. Among other challenges, subjective and objective quality assessments of point clouds are still open problems. Most proposed subjective quality evaluation methodologies are variants or extensions of counter parts from conventional approaches such as those proposed in various ITU-R and ITU-T recommendations. A key issue with point cloud content is that of rendering and display devices which are thoroughly different from those in other modalities in addition to novel applications which depart from traditional display devices. In this paper, we propose a radically different approach to point cloud subjective quality assessment for point cloud by making use of augmented reality head mounted displays. Beside description of the approach, we show examples of implementation of the proposed methodology and draw conclusions regarding its advantages and drawbacks. Finally, the proposed approach is used in assessing the performance of widely used objective metrics to compute quality of point cloud contents when they undergo various types of distortions such as corruption by noise, simplification and compression.

[1]  Dong Tian,et al.  Geometric distortion metrics for point cloud compression , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[2]  Methods , metrics and procedures for statistical evaluation , qualification and comparison of objective quality prediction models , 2013 .

[3]  Rufael Mekuria,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Point Cloud Codec for Tele-Immersive Video , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[4]  Jenq-Neng Hwang,et al.  A subjective quality evaluation for 3D point cloud models , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing.

[5]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  Metro: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces , 1998, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  On subjective and objective quality evaluation of point cloud geometry , 2017, 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[8]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[9]  Rufael Mekuria,et al.  Evaluation criteria for PCC (Point Cloud Compression) , 2016 .

[10]  Catarina Brites,et al.  Subjective and objective quality evaluation of 3D point cloud denoising algorithms , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW).