MHD stability with strongly reversed magnetic shear in JET

Recent operation of JET with centrally strongly reversed magnetic shear, produced with the help of lower hybrid current drive, has extended the domain in which internal transport barriers (ITBs) can be formed in JET. Performance is frequently limited by magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities in these reversed shear regimes. The most severe limit is a pressure driven kink mode which leads to a disruption. This disruptive limit is essentially the same in ITB plasmas with low or strongly reversed shear. Unique to the reversed shear regime is a dominantly n = 1 mode, which has multiple harmonics. This mode is a seemingly common limit to performance, in the highest performance plasmas. Also unique to the reversed shear regime are q > 1 sawteeth events, which can in turn trigger n = 1 post-cursor oscillations. In general, these post-cursor oscillations are benign but do provide valuable information on the q-profile. Other instabilities, including 'snakes' at the outer q = 3 surface, are also observed to limit the performance of reversed magnetic shear ITB regimes.

[1]  C. D. Challis,et al.  Effect of q-profile modification by LHCD on internal transport barriers in JET*Effect of q-profile m , 2001 .

[2]  J. P. Goedbloed,et al.  CASTOR: Normal-Mode Analysis of Resistive MHD Plasmas☆ , 1998 .

[3]  T. Fujita,et al.  High performance experiments in JT-60U reversed shear discharges , 1999 .

[4]  Resistive instabilities in a tokamak , 1976 .

[5]  Lao,et al.  Resistive Interchange Modes in Negative Central Shear Tokamaks with Peaked Pressure Profiles. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[6]  Lao,et al.  Enhanced confinement and stability in DIII-D discharges with reversed magnetic shear. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[7]  T. Tala,et al.  Observation of zero current density in the core of jet discharges with lower hybrid heating and current drive. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[8]  Ambrogio Fasoli,et al.  MHD Spectroscopy through Detecting Toroidal Alfvén Eigenmodes and Alfvén Wave Cascades , 2001 .

[9]  M. G. Bell,et al.  Simulations of alpha parameters in a TFTR DT supershot with high fusion power , 1995 .

[10]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Triggering of internal transport barrier in JET , 2002 .

[11]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  Progress in internal transport barrier plasmas with lower hybrid current drive and heating in JET (Joint European Torus) , 2002 .

[12]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Edge issues in ITB plasmas in JET , 2002 .

[13]  G. Conway,et al.  Digital signal processing techniques for plasma dispersion curve measurements , 1987 .

[14]  E. D. Fredrickson,et al.  Improved confinement with reversed magnetic shear in TFTR. , 1995 .

[15]  X. Litaudon,et al.  Electron heated internal transport barriers in JET , 2002 .

[16]  F. Milani,et al.  Towards fully non-inductive current drive operation in JET , 2002 .

[17]  McGuire,et al.  Off-Axis Sawteeth and Double-Tearing Reconnectionin Reversed Magnetic Shear Plasmas in TFTR. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[18]  A. Sips,et al.  MHD stability of optimized shear discharges in JET , 1999 .

[19]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Equilibrium analysis of current profiles in tokamaks , 1990 .

[20]  S. Pinches,et al.  Theoretical Interpretation of Alfvén Cascades in Tokamaks with Nonmonotonic q Profiles , 2001 .

[21]  C. Gormezano,et al.  High performance tokamak operation regimes , 1999 .