Enclaves of anarchy: Preprint sharing, 1940-1990

The purpose of this paper is to provide a timeline of the gradual organization of preprint sharing of traditional research articles and its consolidation as the preferred means of connection among scientists engaged at the forefront of increasingly narrower sub-specialties that emerged after World War II. At mid-century, the flood of research that scientific journals faced created a burden on the traditional system of publication. The social dynamics involved in the production of high energy physics research, in particular, proved to be the main arena of scientific communication that contributed to the advent of preprint exchange as an alternate system of publication during the 20th century. Increasing sophistication of information and communication technology relative to cost and convenience of use were factors that ultimately led to the online deployment of arχiv in 1991. The history of preprint sharing in scientific publishing is a relatively unexplored area of study, and subserves the larger need to understand the immediate circumstances surrounding the move to digital publication by scientific journals. In particular, the challenge presented by preprint sharing to the formal system of peer review that print journals have traditionally offered was an over-riding concern throughout the course of the changes described here.

[1]  Mortimer Taube Implications for professional organization and training , 1953 .

[2]  D. Beaver On the failure to detect previously published research , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[4]  J. D. Bernal SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION AND ITS USERS , 1960 .

[5]  W. D. Garvey Communication, the essence of science , 1979 .

[6]  E. N. Bouton,et al.  The preprint perplex in an electronic age , 1995 .

[7]  David Hoole The changing geography of an industry and a debate , 2006, Inf. Serv. Use.

[8]  Is journal publication obsolescent , 1966 .

[9]  H. Menzel Planning the Consequences of Unplanned Action in Scientific Communication , 2008 .

[10]  H. B. O'Connell Physicists thriving with paperless , 2000 .

[11]  M. Moravcsik Rejecting published work: It couldn't happen in physics! (or could it?) , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  D. R. Swanson Scientific journals and information services of the future. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[13]  W. D. Garvey,et al.  Scientific communication as a social system. The exchange of information on research evolves predictably and can be experimentally modified. , 1967, Science.

[14]  J. D. Bernal,et al.  The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference , 1948, Nature.

[15]  C. D. Andriesse Dutch Messengers: A History of Science Publishing, 1930-1980 , 2008 .

[16]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Kristrun Gunnarsdottir,et al.  Scientific Journal Publications , 2005 .

[18]  Verner W. Clapp,et al.  The problem of specialized communication in modern society , 1953 .

[19]  Rob Kling,et al.  The internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  S. Ceci,et al.  Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  J H McNinch The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference, London, June 21-July 2, 1948. , 1949, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.