Characterization of a Large Panel of Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts Representing the Clinical Heterogeneity of Human Colorectal Cancer

Purpose: Patient-derived xenograft models are considered to represent the heterogeneity of human cancers and advanced preclinical models. Our consortium joins efforts to extensively develop and characterize a new collection of patient-derived colorectal cancer (CRC) models. Experimental Design: From the 85 unsupervised surgical colorectal samples collection, 54 tumors were successfully xenografted in immunodeficient mice and rats, representing 35 primary tumors, 5 peritoneal carcinoses and 14 metastases. Histologic and molecular characterization of patient tumors, first and late passages on mice includes the sequence of key genes involved in CRC (i.e., APC, KRAS, TP53), aCGH, and transcriptomic analysis. Results: This comprehensive characterization shows that our collection recapitulates the clinical situation about the histopathology and molecular diversity of CRC. Moreover, patient tumors and corresponding models are clustering together allowing comparison studies between clinical and preclinical data. Hence, we conducted pharmacologic monotherapy studies with standard of care for CRC (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and cetuximab). Through this extensive in vivo analysis, we have shown the loss of human stroma cells after engraftment, observed a metastatic phenotype in some models, and finally compared the molecular profile with the drug sensitivity of each tumor model. Through an experimental cetuximab phase II trial, we confirmed the key role of KRAS mutation in cetuximab resistance. Conclusions: This new collection could bring benefit to evaluate novel targeted therapeutic strategies and to better understand the basis for sensitivity or resistance of tumors from individual patients. Clin Cancer Res; 18(19); 5314–28. ©2012 AACR.

[1]  P. Chappuis,et al.  A simple p53 functional assay for screening cell lines, blood, and tumors. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  H Berndt,et al.  [Epidemiology of colorectal cancer]. , 1991, Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung.

[3]  T. Sørlie,et al.  Molecular profiling and characterization of luminal‐like and basal‐like in vivo breast cancer xenograft models , 2009, Molecular oncology.

[4]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  A New Model of Patient Tumor-Derived Breast Cancer Xenografts for Preclinical Assays , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  Terrence S. Furey,et al.  The UCSC Genome Browser Database , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  S A Forbes,et al.  The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) , 2008, Current protocols in human genetics.

[7]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  Direct In Vivo Xenograft Tumor Model for Predicting Chemotherapeutic Drug Response in Cancer Patients , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[8]  A. Maier,et al.  Clonogenic assay with established human tumour xenografts: correlation of in vitro to in vivo activity as a basis for anticancer drug discovery. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[9]  A. Balmain,et al.  Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  M. Rothenberg Efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan in patients with colorectal cancer. , 1998, Seminars in oncology.

[11]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[12]  L. Seymour,et al.  Clinical predictive value of the in vitro cell line, human xenograft, and mouse allograft preclinical cancer models. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[13]  A Pilot Clinical Study of Treatment Guided by Personalized Tumorgrafts in Patients with Advanced Cancer , 2011, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[14]  H. Lane,et al.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of RAD001 (everolimus) in normal and tumor-bearing rodents , 2010, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[15]  R. de Wit,et al.  Human xenograft models as useful tools to assess the potential of novel therapeutics in prostate cancer , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  Mark T. W. Ebbert,et al.  Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[17]  M. Wigler,et al.  Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[18]  Sudhir Srivastava,et al.  Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Anne Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Molecular profiling of patient-derived breast cancer xenografts , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[20]  I. Fichtner,et al.  Anticancer drug response and expression of molecular markers in early-passage xenotransplanted colon carcinomas. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[21]  F. Schabel,et al.  Toxicity and anticancer activity of a new triazine antifolate (NSC 127755). , 1982, Cancer research.

[22]  E. Barillot,et al.  Establishment and Characterization of a Panel of Human Uveal Melanoma Xenografts Derived from Primary and/or Metastatic Tumors , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  I. Cree,et al.  Efficacy of anti-cancer agents in cell lines versus human primary tumour tissue. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[24]  Francesca Molinari,et al.  PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. , 2009, Cancer research.

[25]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Genome Remodeling in a Basal-like Breast Cancer Metastasis and Xenograft , 2010, Nature.

[26]  A. Duval,et al.  Evaluation of tumor microsatellite instability using five quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats and pentaplex PCR. , 2002, Gastroenterology.

[27]  Davide Corà,et al.  A molecularly annotated platform of patient-derived xenografts ("xenopatients") identifies HER2 as an effective therapeutic target in cetuximab-resistant colorectal cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[28]  T. Beckers,et al.  Primary resistance to cetuximab in a panel of patient-derived tumour xenograft models: activation of MET as one mechanism for drug resistance. , 2011, European journal of cancer.