Delivering adapted physical activity by videoconference to patients with fatigue under immune checkpoint inhibitors: Lessons learned from the PACTIMe-FEAS feasibility study

Introduction Fatigue is one of the most frequent symptoms in anti-cancer immune therapy. Physical activity has been proven effective in reducing fatigue, but unmet needs remain regarding the provision and access to adapted programmes, which efficiently addresses the main barriers to PA. Methods The PACTIMe-FEAS study primarily aimed at primarily to evaluate the feasibility and the acceptability of a videoconference-based 6-month programme promoting physical activity, and secondarily to assess its potential post-immediate and short-term effectiveness in reducing fatigue in cancer patients under immune therapy. Numeric self-reported questionnaires (Visual Analogue Scale-fatigue, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Échelle de Motivation envers l’Activité Physique en contexte de Santé, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Insomnia Severity Index) were completed by participants through an online secure platform at three time points: just before (T1), and after (T2) the programme, and 3 months later (T3). Results Sixteen participants (50% male, 50% female, mean age 54 years, 69% melanoma, 31% overweight), with moderate-to-severe fatigue, entered the internet-delivered intervention; 14 completed it, with an average completion rate of physical activity supervised sessions of 75%. Satisfaction was high, confirming a demand for group format, personalised approach, professional guidance and home-based device, to support the practice of regular physical activity. A decrease in fatigue was observed at the end of the programme. Discussion The recruitment process did prove to be challenging, with a relatively small eligible population, and will need to be reconsidered to envision a larger scale trial. But here and now, this feasibility study provides the first promising foundations to develop further research on the effectiveness of an original remote programme.

[1]  F. Alla,et al.  [An updated synthesis of the international recommendations about the use of non-pharmacological interventions in the treatment of fatigue]. , 2021, Bulletin du cancer.

[2]  G. Gartlehner,et al.  Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic literature review , 2020, Oncoimmunology.

[3]  Jiang Du,et al.  The Differences in the Safety and Tolerability of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as Treatment for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Melanoma: Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review , 2019, Front. Pharmacol..

[4]  L. Stafford,et al.  Why did we fail? Challenges recruiting parents with cancer into a psycho‐educational support program , 2019, Psycho-oncology.

[5]  M. Clark,et al.  Evidence for telehealth group-based treatment: A systematic review , 2019, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  P. Sarrazin,et al.  Development and validation of the ‘Echelle de Motivation envers l’Activité Physique en contexte de Santé’: A motivation scale towards health-oriented physical activity in French , 2019, Journal of health psychology.

[7]  L. Giangregorio,et al.  Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research , 2018, Pilot and Feasibility Studies.

[8]  P. Krarup,et al.  The “Interval Walking in Colorectal Cancer” (I-WALK-CRC) study: Design, methods and recruitment results of a randomized controlled feasibility trial , 2018, Contemporary clinical trials communications.

[9]  S. Nancarrow,et al.  Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  P. Hinds,et al.  Physical activity reduces fatigue in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2018, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[11]  R. Ancellin,et al.  Bénéfices de l’activité physique pendant et après cancer : des connaissances scientifiques aux repères pratiques , 2017, Oncologie.

[12]  L. Ritterband,et al.  Efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2016, Sleep medicine reviews.

[13]  E. Beller,et al.  Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  A. Mehrabi,et al.  Treatment-associated Fatigue in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[15]  H. Zarour,et al.  Emerging Opportunities and Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  P. Chanson,et al.  Management of immune checkpoint blockade dysimmune toxicities: a collaborative position paper. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  J. Soria,et al.  Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[18]  Jill O Jin,et al.  JAMA Oncology Patient Page. Performance Status in Patients With Cancer. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[19]  P. Jacobsen,et al.  Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer‐related fatigue: Ready for implementation to practice? , 2015, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  K. Courneya,et al.  American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  S. Julious Two‐sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods by Robert G. Newcombe, Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17:857–872 , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  S. Gentile,et al.  Validation of the French 'multidimensional fatigue inventory' (MFI 20). , 2003, European journal of cancer care.

[24]  R. Werner,et al.  Unipedal stance testing as an indicator of fall risk among older outpatients. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  C. Jessie Jones,et al.  Development and Validation of a Functional Fitness Test for Community-Residing Older Adults , 1999 .

[26]  G. Noffal,et al.  The reliability and validity of a chair sit-and-reach test as a measure of hamstring flexibility in older adults. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[27]  T. Perneger,et al.  The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[29]  Charles M. Morin,et al.  Insomnia: Psychological Assessment and Management , 1993 .

[30]  Huston Gj,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[31]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Toxicities of the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.