Prediction of Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke Type 1 Curves

Study Design: This is a retrospective single-center and single-surgeon study. Objective: The present study examined for preoperative parameters having the highest correlation with compensatory thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve correction 2 years after surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with Lenke type 1 curves. Summary of Background: Several parameters have been considered to evaluate the flexibility of compensatory TL/L curve in AIS patients with Lenke type 1 curves. However, the imaging position with the strongest correlation with postoperative spontaneous TL/L curve correction is unknown. Data: In total, 37 patients with AIS Lenke type 1 curves who had undergone skip pedicle screw fixation were followed for a 2-year period were enrolled. Materials and Methods: TL/L Cobb angles measured at the standing posteroanterior view, supine position, supine position with maximum bending, supine position with traction, prone position, and prone-push position were determined before surgery. Using TL/L Cobb angles determined 2 years postoperatively, correlations between preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were calculated for each position using the Spearman rank-correlation coefficient, linear regression analysis, and paired t tests. Results: Mean preoperative mean±SD TL/L Cobb angle was significantly improved from 31±9 to 13±8 degrees at the study end point. In analyses of correlations between postoperative TL/L Cobb angle and preoperative parameters, the supine position with traction was most strongly associated with TL/L curve correction rate at 2 years after surgery (r=0.72; P<0.01), with paired t tests revealing a significant mean difference of 3.1 degrees. Conclusions: Preoperative Cobb angle evaluated at the supine position with traction had the strongest correlation with spontaneously corrected TL/L curve Cobb angle after selective thoracic fusion for AIS Lenke type 1 curves. Accordingly, it may be sufficient to evaluate TL/L curve correction at this position only to reduce radiation exposure and operative time.

[1]  H. Kato,et al.  Computer-assisted skip pedicle screw fixation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[2]  Y. Kanda,et al.  Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR' for medical statistics , 2012, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[3]  Zi-qiang Chen,et al.  Using Precisely Controlled Bidirectional Orthopedic Forces to Assess Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Comparisons Between Push-Traction Film, Supine Side Bending, Suspension, and Fulcrum Bending Film , 2011, Spine.

[4]  P. Newton,et al.  Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Factors Influencing the Selection of the Optimal Lowest Instrumented Vertebra , 2011, Spine.

[5]  R. Betz,et al.  Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction in Selective Thoracic Fusions of Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches , 2008, Spine.

[6]  A. van Ooij,et al.  Predictability of the spontaneous lumbar curve correction after selective thoracic fusion in idiopathic scoliosis , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[7]  M. Tezer,et al.  Assessment of Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2005, Spine.

[8]  Karen Steger-May,et al.  Can We Predict the Ultimate Lumbar Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Undergoing a Selective Fusion with Undercorrection of the Thoracic Curve? , 2004, Spine.

[9]  J. Cheng,et al.  Longitudinal changes in trunkal balance after selective fusion of King II curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 2000, Spine.

[10]  R. Betz,et al.  Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1999, Spine.

[11]  J C Leong,et al.  Assessment of Scoliosis Correction in Relation to Flexibility Using the Fulcrum Bending Correction Index , 1998, Spine.

[12]  K. Bridwell,et al.  Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the basics and the controversies. , 1994, Spine.

[13]  R. McCall,et al.  Criteria for Selective Fusion in Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation , 1992, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[14]  V. Kalen,et al.  The Behavior of the Unfused Lumbar Curve Following Selective Thoracic Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1990, Spine.

[15]  R. Winter,et al.  The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  J. Moe A critical analysis of methods of fusion for scoliosis; an evaluation in two hundred and sixty-six patients. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  W. Cole,et al.  Surgical treatment of double major scoliosis. Improvement of the lumbar curve after fusion of the thoracic curve. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.