Facebook, Twitter, and Youth Engagement: A Quasi-experimental Study of Social Media Use and Protest Behavior Using Propensity Score Matching

This study examines changes in the association between social media use and protest behavior in the context of growing social unrest among the younger population. Using propensity score matching, it analyzes data from a repeated cross-sectional survey taken before, during, and after the 2011 student demonstrations in Chile. The results indicate that both Facebook and Twitter have significant effects on the likelihood of protesting, although these effects vary across time and platforms. These differences are explained in terms of the protest cycle and the strong-tie versus weak-tie network structures that characterize Facebook and Twitter, respectively. Furthermore, the findings highlight the value of studying the time dynamics of the social media–protest relationship.

[1]  Soo Youn Oh,et al.  To Personalize or Depersonalize? When and How Politicians' Personalized Tweets Affect the Public's Reactions , 2012 .

[2]  N. Kaneva.  Nation Branding: Toward an Agenda for Critical Research , 2011 .

[3]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  C. Ham,et al.  The embarrassment of riches?: A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout , 2013 .

[5]  R. Koopmans.  Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention , 2007 .

[6]  Dean S. Karlan,et al.  Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions , 2006 .

[7]  Cristian Cabalín-Quijada,et al.  Online and mobilized students: The use of Facebook in the Chilean student protests , 2014 .

[8]  Philip Johnson,et al.  Uses and Gratifications of Twitter: An Examination of User Motives and Satisfaction of Twitter Use , 2009 .

[9]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[10]  Ken'ichi Ikeda,et al.  Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy , 2006 .

[11]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  Student and Environmental Protests in Chile: The Role of Social Media , 2015 .

[12]  Paul Scifleet,et al.  When social media are your source , 2013, Inf. Res..

[13]  Jacob Groshek,et al.  Forecasting and observing: A cross-methodological consideration of Internet and mobile phone diffusion in the Egyptian revolt , 2012 .

[14]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network , 2011, Scientific reports.

[15]  W. Bennett.  Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age , 2008 .

[16]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[17]  S. Tarrow.  Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention , 1993 .

[18]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[19]  P. Howard,et al.  Opening Closed Regimes: What Was the Role of Social Media During the Arab Spring? , 2011 .

[20]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[21]  Patricia L. Hipsher.  Democratization and the Decline of Urban Social Movements in Chile and Spain , 1996 .

[22]  Yen-Sheng Chiang,et al.  Birds of Moderately Different Feathers: Bandwagon Dynamics and the Threshold Heterogeneity of Network Neighbors , 2007 .

[23]  Marta Cantijoch,et al.  POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND THE INTERNET , 2009 .

[24]  Hanspeter Kriesi,et al.  The Blackwell companion to social movements , 2003 .

[25]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model , 2007, Journal of Communication.

[26]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  The Arab Spring| Overthrowing the Protest Paradigm? How The New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter Covered the Egyptian Revolution , 2011 .

[27]  Zizi Papacharissi.  A Networked Self : Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites , 2010 .

[28]  J. Kitts.  Mobilizing in Black Boxes: Social Networks and Participation in Social Movement Organizations , 2000 .

[29]  Christopher W. Larimer,et al.  Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[30]  Gary King,et al.  Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference , 2007, Political Analysis.

[31]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Johan Östman,et al.  Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user- generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people , 2012, New Media Soc..

[33]  S. Valenzuela.  Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior , 2013 .

[34]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[35]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square , 2012 .

[36]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[37]  Lindsay H. Hoffman,et al.  Is Internet Content Different after All? A Content Analysis of Mobilizing Information in Online and Print Newspapers , 2006 .

[38]  E. Segev,et al.  Social Media and the Arab Spring , 2013 .

[39]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  The Social Media Basis of Youth Protest Behavior: The Case of Chile , 2012 .

[40]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[41]  W. Bennett.  Civic Life Online : Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth , 2007 .

[42]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[43]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[44]  B. Loader,et al.  Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements , 2004 .

[45]  Marco Caliendo,et al.  Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[46]  Felix Thoemmes,et al.  Propensity score matching in SPSS , 2012, 1201.6385.

[47]  Maria Bakardjieva,et al.  Reconfiguring the mediapolis: New media and civic agency , 2012, New Media Soc..

[48]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action , 1993 .

[49]  Katy E. Pearce,et al.  Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan , 2012 .

[50]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[51]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[52]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Timothy Macafee,et al.  Killing the Bill Online? Pathways to Young People's Protest Engagement via Social Media , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[55]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[56]  Roger V. Gould.  Collective Action and Network Structure , 1993 .

[57]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[58]  Stefano M. Iacus,et al.  CEM: Coarsened Exact Matching Software , 2009 .

[59]  R. Dalton,et al.  The Individual–Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour , 2009, British Journal of Political Science.

[60]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[61]  Shelley Boulianne.  Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research , 2009 .

[62]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Social Media and Political Change: Capacity, Constraint, and Consequence , 2012 .

[63]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement , 2011, Commun. Res..

[64]  J. Earl,et al.  Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age , 2011 .

[65]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Reconceptualizing Collective Action in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2005 .

[66]  Betsy Sinclair,et al.  The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior , 2012 .

[67]  E. Katz.  The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis , 1957 .

[68]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  Politics without Citizens? Public Opinion, Television News, the President, and Real-World Factors in Chile, 2000-2005 , 2011 .