Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in interventional cardiology: clinical application of QCA measurements.

[1]  G. Mancini,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography , 1994 .

[2]  P. Serruys,et al.  Usefulness of repeat coronary angiography 24 hours after successful balloon angioplasty to evaluate early luminal deterioration and facilitate quantitative analysis. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  P. Serruys,et al.  Evaluation of Ketanserin in the Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty A Multicenter Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trial , 1993, Circulation.

[4]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Luminal narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A study of clinical, procedural, and lesional factors related to long-term angiographic outcome. Coronary Artery Restenosis Prevention on Repeated Thromboxane Antagonism (CARPORT) Study Group. , 1993, Circulation.

[5]  D. Ricci,et al.  A comparison of directional atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 1993 .

[7]  P. Serruys,et al.  Usefulness of quantitative and qualitative angiographic lesion morphology, and clinical characteristics in predicting major adverse cardiac events during and after native coronary balloon angioplasty. CARPORT and MERCATOR Study Groups. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy and balloon angioplasty: comparative analysis based on matched lesions. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P. Serruys,et al.  The mechanism of directional coronary atherectomy. , 1993, European heart journal.

[10]  I. Penn,et al.  Safety, success, and restenosis after elective coronary implantation of the Palmaz-Schatz stent in 100 patients at a single center. , 1993, American heart journal.

[11]  P. Serruys,et al.  Matching based on quantitative coronary angiography as a surrogate for randomized studies: comparison between stent implantation and balloon angioplasty of native coronary artery lesions. , 1993, American heart journal.

[12]  P. Serruys,et al.  Which angiographic variable best describes functional status 6 months after successful single-vessel coronary balloon angioplasty? , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  A. Gershlick,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a proposal of new comparative approaches based on quantitative angiography. , 1992, British heart journal.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Experiences of a quantitative coronary angiographic core laboratory in restenosis prevention trials , 1993 .

[15]  C M Gibson,et al.  Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  R. Erbel,et al.  Quantitative analysis of elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty and after intracoronary implantation of balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stents. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  B. Kimball,et al.  Comparison of acute elastic recoil after directional coronary atherectomy versus standard balloon angioplasty. , 1992, American Heart Journal.

[18]  J. Isner,et al.  How Does Angioplasy Work?: Serial Analysis of Human Iliac Arteries Using Intravascular Ultrasound , 1992, Circulation.

[19]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Restenosis After Placement of Palmaz‐Schatz Stents in Native Coronary Arteries: Initial Results of a Multicenter Experience , 1992, Circulation.

[20]  R D Safian,et al.  The Importance of Acute Luminal Diameter in Determining Restenosis After Coronary Atherectomy or Stenting , 1992, Circulation.

[21]  D. Baim,et al.  Influence of vessel selection on the observed restenosis rate after endoluminal stenting or directional atherectomy. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  J. Reiber,et al.  Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries. , 1992, American heart journal.

[23]  R D Safian,et al.  Restenosis After Directional Coronary Atherectomy Effects of Luminal Diameter and Deep Wall Excision , 1992, Circulation.

[24]  P D Verdouw,et al.  In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[25]  K. Robinson,et al.  Coronary intimal proliferation after balloon injury and stenting in swine: an animal model of restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Background and methods for the lovastatin restenosis trial after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Study Group. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  C M Gibson,et al.  Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experience. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  A. Colombo,et al.  Coronary stenting: single institution experience with the initial 100 cases using the Palmaz-Schatz stent. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[29]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Does the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril prevent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty? Results of the MERCATOR study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Multicenter European Research Trial with Cilazapril after Angiopla , 1992, Circulation.

[30]  D. Baim,et al.  Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devices. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  S E Nissen,et al.  Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  J. Isner,et al.  Failure of angiography to accurately depict the extent of coronary artery narrowing in three fatal cases of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  P. Serruys,et al.  Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty follows a near gaussian distribution: a quantitative angiographic study in 1,445 successfully dilated lesions. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Angiographic risk factors of luminal narrowing after coronary balloon angioplasty using balloon measurements to reflect stretch and elastic recoil at the dilation site. The CARPORT Study Group. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[35]  P. Serruys,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: the paradox of increased lumen diameter and restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  S. Ellis,et al.  Arterial injury and the enigma of coronary restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  P. Serruys,et al.  Postangioplasty restenosis rate between segments of the major coronary arteries. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  P. Serruys,et al.  Methodological problems related to the quantitative assessment of stretch, elastic recoil, and balloon-artery ratio. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[40]  P. Serruys,et al.  Comparative quantitative angiographic analysis of directional coronary atherectomy and balloon coronary angioplasty. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[41]  P. Serruys,et al.  Morphologic change in coronary artery stenosis with the Medtronic Wiktor stent: initial results from the core laboratory for quantitative angiography. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[42]  J. Beranek.  Stenting of coronary arteries. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[43]  K. Gould,et al.  Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[44]  P. Serruys,et al.  Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty With Thromboxane A2‐Receptor Blockade: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial , 1991, Circulation.

[45]  J. B. Park,et al.  Restenosis rate after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a literature overview. , 1991, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[46]  J. Ambrose.  Prognostic implications of lesion irregularity on coronary angiography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  Steven E. Nissen,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Lumen Size and Wall Morphology in Normal Subjects and Patients With Coronary Artery Disease , 1991, Circulation.

[48]  P. Serruys,et al.  Edge detection versus videodensitometry for quantitative angiographic assessment of directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[49]  C. Hanet,et al.  Influence of balloon size and stenosis morphology on immediate and delayed elastic recoil after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[50]  J. Isner,et al.  Combination Balloon‐Ultrasound Imaging Catheter for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty: Validation of Imaging, Analysis of Recoil, and Identification of Plaque Fracture , 1991, Circulation.

[51]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantitative angiography after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, British heart journal.

[52]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. , 1991, Circulation.

[53]  P. Serruys,et al.  Stenting of coronary arteries: has a modern Pandora's box been opened? , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[54]  G. Mancini,et al.  Quantitative coronary arteriographic methods in the interventional catheterization laboratory: an update and perspective. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[55]  P. Serruys,et al.  Regional differences in elastic recoil after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a quantitative angiographic study. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[56]  J. Reiber,et al.  Edge detection versus densitometry for assessing coronary stenting quantitatively. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[57]  Walter L. Henry,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging of Human Coronary Arteries In Vivo: Analysis of Tissue Characterizations With Comparison to In Vitro Histological Specimens , 1991, Circulation.

[58]  D. Baim,et al.  Insights into the mechanism of luminal improvement after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[59]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Bimodal distribution of diameter stenosis 4 to 12 months after angioplasty: Implications for definitions and interpretation of restenosis , 1991 .

[60]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: pathologic observations in 20 patients. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[61]  B Meier,et al.  Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary-artery stent. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[62]  G. B. John Mancini,et al.  Digital coronary angiography: advantages and limitations , 1991 .

[63]  J. Reiber,et al.  Do stents interfere with the densitometric assessment of a coronary artery lesion? , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[64]  R. Kerber,et al.  Coronary arterial remodeling studied by high-frequency epicardial echocardiography: an early compensatory mechanism in patients with obstructive coronary atherosclerosis. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[65]  Peter Niederer,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1991, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[66]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy: differences between primary atheromatous and restenosis lesions and influence of subintimal tissue resection. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[67]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantitative angiographic assessment of elastic recoil after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[68]  V. Fuster,et al.  Angiographic patterns of balloon inflation during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: role of pressure-diameter curves in studying distensibility and elasticity of the stenotic lesion and the mechanism of dilation. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[69]  S. Kalbfleisch,et al.  Automated quantitation of indexes of coronary lesion complexity. Comparison between patients with stable and unstable angina. , 1990, Circulation.

[70]  V. Fuster,et al.  Syndromes of accelerated atherosclerosis: role of vascular injury and smooth muscle cell proliferation. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[71]  P. Serruys,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: new standards for clinical studies. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[72]  N. Kleiman,et al.  Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. , 1990, American heart journal.

[73]  J. Schofer,et al.  Impact of compensatory enlargement of atherosclerotic coronary arteries on angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[74]  Spencer B. King,et al.  Restenosis After Coronary Angioplasty: Potential Biologic Determinants and Role of Intimal Hyperplasia , 1989 .

[75]  G. Roubin,et al.  Histopathologic phenomena at the site of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: the problem of restenosis. , 1989, Human pathology.

[76]  S. Ellis,et al.  Importance of stenosis morphology in the estimation of restenosis risk after elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[77]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Change in diameter of coronary artery segments adjacent to stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: failure of percent diameter stenosis measurement to reflect morphologic changes induced by balloon dilation. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[78]  K. Gould,et al.  Identifying and Measuring Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis: Quantitative Coronary Arteriography and Positron Emission Tomography , 1988, Circulation.

[79]  P. Serruys,et al.  Additional improvement of stenosis geometry in human coronary arteries by stenting after balloon dilatation. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[80]  S. M. Collins,et al.  Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard". , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[81]  P. Serruys,et al.  Early and late assessment of stenosis geometry after coronary arterial stenting. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[82]  P W Serruys,et al.  Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. , 1988, Circulation.

[83]  J. Reiber,et al.  Which cineangiographically assessed anatomic variable correlates best with functional measurements of stenosis severity? A comparison of quantitative analysis of the coronary cineangiogram with measured coronary flow reserve and exercise/redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[84]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[85]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Multilesion coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic follow-up. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[86]  J. Reiber,et al.  Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? , 1987, Circulation.

[87]  C. Zarins,et al.  Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[88]  F Joffre,et al.  Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[89]  R. Kerber,et al.  Delineation of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis by high-frequency epicardial echocardiography. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[90]  E. Topol,et al.  Multiple vessel coronary angioplasty: classification, results, and patterns of restenosis in 494 consecutive patients. , 1987, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[91]  C. J. Slager,et al.  Quantitative Coronary and Left Ventricular Cineangiography: Methodology and Clinical Applications , 1986 .

[92]  B Meier,et al.  Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease. , 1986, Circulation.

[93]  M J Davies,et al.  Potential errors in the estimation of coronary arterial stenosis from clinical arteriography with reference to the shape of the coronary arterial lumen. , 1986, British heart journal.

[94]  K. Gould,et al.  Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[95]  H. Saner,et al.  The disease-free wall in coronary atherosclerosis: its relation to degree of obstruction. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[96]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[97]  H J ten Katen,et al.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[98]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Coronary Artery Dimensions from Cineangiograms-Methodology and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Analysis Procedure , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[99]  T. Ryan,et al.  The mechanism of transluminal angioplasty: evidence for formation of aneurysms in experimental atherosclerosis. , 1983, Circulation.

[100]  M. Reidy,et al.  Mechanisms of stenosis after arterial injury. , 1983, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[101]  F. Klocke,et al.  Measurements of coronary blood flow and degree of stenosis: current clinical implications and continuing uncertainties. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[102]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Computer-Aided Quantitation Of The Severity Of Coronary Obstructions From Single View Cineangiograms , 1982, Other Conferences.

[103]  E L Bolson,et al.  Experimental Validation of Quantitative Coronary Arteriography for Determining Pressure-Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenosis , 1982, Circulation.

[104]  Jan J. Gerbrands,et al.  Computerized Quantitative Coronary Angiography Applied to Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty: Advantages and Limitations , 1982 .

[105]  W. Roberts,et al.  Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[106]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Correlation of Coronary Arteriograms and Left Ventriculograms with Postmortem Studies , 1977, Circulation.

[107]  N R Cholvin,et al.  Hemodynamics of arterial stenoses at elevated flow rates. , 1977, Circulation research.

[108]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.

[109]  R. Dinsmore,et al.  Interobserver Variability in Coronary Angiography , 1976, Circulation.

[110]  D. Hackel,et al.  Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[111]  G W Hamilton,et al.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[112]  J. Edwards,et al.  Pathology of coronary atherosclerosis. , 1971, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.