BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types

The equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model BIOME3 simulates vegetation distribution and biogeochemistry, and couples vegetation distribution directly to biogeochemistry. Model inputs consist of latitude, soil texture class, and monthly climate (temperature, precipitation, and sunshine) data on a 0.5 degrees grid. Ecophysiological constraints determine which plant functional types (PFTs) may potentially occur. A coupled carbon and water flux model is then used to calculate, for each PFT, the leaf area index (LAI) that maximizes net primary production (NPP), subject to the constraint that NPP must be sufficient to maintain this LAI. Competition between PFTs is simulated by using the optimal NPP of each PFT as an index of competitiveness, with additional rules to approximate the dynamic equilibrium between natural disturbance and succession driven by light competition. Model output consists of a quantitative vegetation state description in terms of the dominant PFT, secondary PFTs present, and the total LAI and NPP for the ecosystem. Canopy conductance is treated as a function of the calculated optimal photosynthetic rate and water stress. Regional evapotranspiration is calculated as a function of canopy conductance, equilibrium evapotranspiration rate, and soil moisture using a simple planetary boundary layer parameterization. This scheme results in a two-way coupling of the carbon and water fluxes through canopy conductance, allowing simulation of the response of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and leaf area to environmental factors including atmospheric CO2. Comparison with the mapped distribution of global vegetation shows that the model successfully reproduces the broad-scale patterns in potential natural vegetation distribution. Comparison with NPP measurements, and with an FPAR (fractional absorbed photosynthetically active radiation) climatology based on remotely sensed greenness measurements, provides further checks on the model's internal logic. The model is envisaged as a tool for integrated analysis of the impacts of changes in climate and CO2 on ecosystem structure and function. (Less)

[1]  I. Colin Prentice,et al.  A coupled carbon and water flux model to predict vegetation structure , 1996 .

[2]  I. Prentice,et al.  A general model for the light-use efficiency of primary production , 1996 .

[3]  C. Justice,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part II: The Generation of Global Fields of Terrestrial Biophysical Parameters from Satellite Data , 1996 .

[4]  Vemap Participants.  Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling , 1995 .

[5]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model , 1995 .

[6]  R. Neilson.  A Model for Predicting Continental‐Scale Vegetation Distribution and Water Balance , 1995 .

[7]  John L. Monteith,et al.  Accommodation between transpiring vegetation and the convective boundary layer , 1995 .

[8]  C. Körner,et al.  Leaf Diffusive Conductances in the Major Vegetation Types of the Globe , 1995 .

[9]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Respiration from the organ level to the stand , 1995 .

[10]  C. Justice,et al.  The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from the NDVI , 1994 .

[11]  Jonathan A. Foley,et al.  Net primary productivity in the terrestrial biosphere: The application of a global model , 1994 .

[12]  D. Marks,et al.  A global perspective of regional vegetation and hydrologic sensitivities from climatic change , 1994 .

[13]  P. Warnant,et al.  CARAIB - A global model of terrestrial biological productivity , 1994 .

[14]  J. Lloyd,et al.  On the temperature dependence of soil respiration , 1994 .

[15]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[16]  E. Schulze,et al.  Relationships among Maximum Stomatal Conductance, Ecosystem Surface Conductance, Carbon Assimilation Rate, and Plant Nitrogen Nutrition: A Global Ecology Scaling Exercise , 1994 .

[17]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide , 1993 .

[18]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[19]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  A simulation model for the transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes , 1993 .

[20]  Ross E. McMurtrie,et al.  Mathematical models of the photosynthetic response of tree stands to rising CO2 concentrations and temperatures , 1993 .

[21]  A. McGuire,et al.  Interactions between carbon and nitrogen dynamics in estimating net primary productivity for potential vegetation in North America , 1992 .

[22]  W. Cramer,et al.  A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate , 1992 .

[23]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[24]  G. Collatz,et al.  Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants , 1992 .

[25]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Potential Net Primary Productivity in South America: Application of a Global Model. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  S. Running,et al.  FOREST-BGC, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[27]  S. Long,et al.  Primary Production in Grasslands and Coniferous Forests with Climate Change: An Overview. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Effects of Climate Change on Plant Respiration. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[29]  G. Collatz,et al.  Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer , 1991 .

[30]  R. Monserud.  Methods for Comparing Global Vegetation Maps , 1990 .

[31]  M. G. Ryan.  Sapwood volume for three subalpine conifers: predictive equations and ecological implications , 1989 .

[32]  Knute J. Nadelhoffer,et al.  Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends , 1989 .

[33]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[34]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  Stomatal Control of Transpiration: Scaling Up from Leaf to Region , 1986 .

[35]  P. S. Eagleson,et al.  Water‐Limited Equilibrium of Savanna Vegetation Systems , 1985 .

[36]  B. Walker,et al.  Interactions of woody and herbaceous vegetation in a southern African Savanna , 1985 .

[37]  E. Matthews.  Global Vegetation and Land Use: New High-Resolution Data Bases for Climate Studies , 1983 .

[38]  David J. Hicks,et al.  The Ecology of Leaf Life Spans , 1982 .

[39]  E. Schulze.  Plant Life Forms and Their Carbon, Water and Nutrient Relations , 1982 .

[40]  J. Berry,et al.  Photosynthetic Response and Adaptation to Temperature in Higher Plants , 1980 .

[41]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity , 1979, Nature.

[42]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Quantum Yields for CO2 Uptake in C3 and C4 Plants: Dependence on Temperature, CO2, and O2 Concentration , 1977 .

[43]  E. T. Linacre,et al.  Estimating the net-radiation flux , 1968 .

[44]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES , 1964 .

[45]  J. Doe.  Soil Map of the World , 1957, Nature.

[46]  M. Monsi.  Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion , 1953 .