Species response curves along environmental gradients. A case study from SE Norwegian swamp forests
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Økland. Mycetophilidae (Diptera), an insect group vulnerable to forestry practices? A comparison of clearcut, managed and semi-natural spruce forests in southern Norway , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.
[2] L. Söderström,et al. Habitat qualities versus long-term continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests , 1997 .
[3] Peter R. Minchin,et al. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination , 1987 .
[4] R. Ejrnæs,et al. Can we trust gradients extracted by Detrended Correspondence Analysis , 2000 .
[5] G. Tyler,et al. Herb layer vegetation of south Swedish beech and oak forests—effects of management and soil acidity during one decade , 1996 .
[6] E. Maarel,et al. Plant functional types – a strategic perspective , 2000 .
[7] R. Douglas Martin,et al. S-PLUS Version 3 , 1992 .
[8] Mike P. Austin,et al. Models for the analysis of species’ response to environmental gradients , 1987 .
[9] S. Díaz,et al. Plant functional traits, ecosystem structure and land-use history along a climatic gradient in central-western Argentina , 1999 .
[10] Martin Kent,et al. Trends and problems in the application of classification and ordination methods in plant ecology , 1988, Vegetatio.
[11] M. Austin,et al. Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implication for management of forest biodiversity , 1996 .
[12] H. Olff,et al. A hierarchical set of models for species response analysis , 1993 .
[13] Jari Oksanen,et al. Rate of compositional turnover along gradients and total gradient length , 1995 .
[14] J. Oksanen,et al. Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients? , 2002 .
[15] T. Økland,et al. PLANT SPECIES COMPOSITION OF BOREAL SPRUCE SWAMP FORESTS: CLOSED DOORS AND WINDOWS OF OPPORTUNITY , 2003 .
[16] C. Braak,et al. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model , 2004, Vegetatio.
[17] M. O. Hill,et al. DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. , 1979 .
[18] M. Ohlson,et al. BOREAL SWAMP FORESTS : BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOTS IN AN IMPOVERISHED FOREST LANDSCAPE , 1998 .
[19] C.J.F. ter Braak,et al. A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .
[20] J. Oksanen,et al. Niche characteristics of Danish woody species as derived from coenoclines , 2002 .
[21] M. Austin,et al. On non-linear species response models in ordination , 1976, Vegetatio.
[22] A. O. Nicholls,et al. Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a β‐function , 1994 .
[23] M. Austin,et al. The theoretical basis of vegetation science. , 1986, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[24] R. H. Økland. Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies , 1996 .
[25] R. Knox,et al. Putting Things in Order: The Advantages of Detrended Correspondence Analysis , 1988, The American Naturalist.
[26] T. J. Carleton. Variation in terricolous bryophyte and macrolichen vegetation along primary gradients in Canadian boreal forests , 1990 .
[27] A. O. Nicholls,et al. Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species , 1990 .
[28] Bruce McCune,et al. INFLUENCE OF NOISY ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ON CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS , 1997 .
[29] R. Peet. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range: Patterns of species diversity , 1978, Vegetatio.
[30] C.J.F. ter Braak,et al. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .
[31] E. Maarel,et al. Theoretical vegetation science on the way , 1989 .
[32] Peter R. Minchin,et al. Montane vegetation of the Mt. Field massif, Tasmania: a test of some hypotheses about properties of community patterns , 1989, Vegetatio.
[33] M. Austin,et al. Community theory and competition in vegetation. , 1990 .
[34] S. Ferson,et al. Putting Things in Order: A Critique of Detrended Correspondence Analysis , 1987, The American Naturalist.
[35] T. M. Smith,et al. A new model for the continuum concept , 1989 .
[36] James B. Grace,et al. The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment , 1999 .
[37] C. Braak. Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .
[38] M. Austin,et al. New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984 .
[39] Frans Bongers,et al. Distribution of twelve moist forest canopy tree species in Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire: response curves to a climatic gradient , 1999 .
[40] R. H. Økland. On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes , 1999 .
[41] Mike P. Austin,et al. The potential contribution of vegetation ecology to biodiversity research , 1999 .
[42] M. Austin. A silent clash of paradigms : some inconsistencies in community ecology , 1999 .
[43] Mike P. Austin. Searching for a Model for Use in Vegetation Analysis , 1980 .
[44] C. L. Mohler,et al. Measuring compositional change along gradients , 1983, Vegetatio.
[45] Hugh G. Gauch,et al. Noise Reduction By Eigenvector Ordinations , 1982 .
[46] T. Økland. An ecological approach to the investigation of a beech forest in Vestfold, SE Norway , 1988 .
[47] A. O. Nicholls,et al. To fix or not to fix the species limits, that is the ecological question: Response to Jari Oksanen , 1997 .
[48] Robert H. Whittaker,et al. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .
[49] R. Whittaker,et al. GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION* , 1967, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[50] M. Austin,et al. Current problems of environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theory , 1994 .
[51] K. Rydgren. Vegetation‐environment relationships of old‐growth spruce forest vegetation in Østmarka Nature Reserve, SE Norway, and comparison of three ordination methods , 1996 .
[52] R. H. Myers. Generalized Linear Models: With Applications in Engineering and the Sciences , 2001 .
[53] Knut Rydgren,et al. Single-tree influence on understorey vegetation in a Norwegian boreal spruce forest , 1999 .
[54] J. Oksanen. Problems of joint display of species and site scores in correspondence analysis , 1987, Vegetatio.
[55] Mark Vellend,et al. Do commonly used indices of β‐diversity measure species turnover? , 2001 .
[56] R. H. Økland. Studies in SE Fennoscandian mires: relevance to ecological theory , 1992 .