Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues

Many methods and applications for maritime transportation risk analysis have been presented in the literature. In parallel, there is a recent focus on foundational issues in risk analysis, with calls for intensified research on fundamental concepts and principles underlying the scientific field. This paper presents a review and analysis of risk definitions, perspectives and scientific approaches to risk analysis found in the maritime transportation application area, focusing on applications addressing accidental risk of shipping in a sea area. For this purpose, a classification of risk definitions, an overview of elements in risk perspectives and a classification of approaches to risk analysis science are applied. Results reveal that in the application area, risk is strongly tied to probability, both in definitions and perspectives, while alternative views exist. A diffuse situation is also found concerning the scientific approach to risk analysis, with realist, proceduralist and constructivist foundations co-existing. Realist approaches dominate the application area. Very few applications systematically account for uncertainty, neither concerning the evidence base nor in relation to the limitations of the risk model in relation to the space of possible outcomes. Some suggestions are made to improve the current situation, aiming to strengthen the scientific basis for risk analysis.

[1]  Sahbi Khanfir,et al.  Ship Collision Risk Assessment using AIS Data , 2012 .

[2]  Jonathan F Davies,et al.  Key Risk Indicators – Their Role in Operational Risk Management and Measurement , 2006 .

[3]  Bo Cerup Simonsen,et al.  GRACAT: software for grounding and collision risk analysis , 2002 .

[4]  Richard A. Cahill.  Collisions and their causes , 1983 .

[5]  T. Aven,et al.  EXPRESSING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY IN RELATION TO QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS , 2009 .

[6]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Expert elicitation of a navigation service implementation effects on ship groundings and collisions in the Gulf of Finland , 2014 .

[7]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .

[8]  Rikard Levin,et al.  Uncertainty in risk assessment - contents and modes of communication , 2005 .

[9]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[10]  Shinya Nakamura,et al.  A comprehensive assessment system for the maritime traffic environment , 1995 .

[11]  T. Jensen,et al.  Quantitative assessment of risk to ship traffic in the fehmarnbelt fixed link project , 2012 .

[12]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  The Prince William Sound Risk Assessment , 2002, Interfaces.

[13]  A. Blokus-Roszkowska,et al.  Collision risk estimation for motorways of the sea , 2012 .

[14]  J. Bradbury.  The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk , 1989 .

[15]  Glyn A. Holton.  Defining Risk , 2004 .

[16]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories , 1996 .

[17]  Carlos Jahn,et al.  Maritime Risk Assessment: Modeling Collisions with Vessels Lying at an Anchorage , 2013 .

[18]  Yahei Fujii,et al.  II—The Probability of Stranding , 1974 .

[19]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[20]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Tools for an Extended Risk Assessment for Ropax Ship-Ship Collision , 2014 .

[21]  Li Suyi,et al.  Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Torkel Bjørnskau,et al.  Oil spill risk analysis of routeing heavy ship traffic in Norwegian waters , 2012 .

[23]  Shenping Hu,et al.  Risk Assessment of Marine Traffic Safety at Coastal Water Area , 2012 .

[24]  G. Apostolakis.  The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[25]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  A Cross-disciplinary Approach to Minimising the Risks of Maritime Transport in the Gulf of Finland , 2009 .

[26]  C Whipple,et al.  Risks of Risk Decisions , 1980, Science.

[27]  Qiang Meng,et al.  An Overview of Maritime Waterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Probability modelling of vessel collisions , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  Tim Futing Liao,et al.  Interpreting probability models , 1994 .

[31]  Georgios Mermiris,et al.  Collision risk revisited , 2010 .

[32]  Céline Kermisch,et al.  Vers une définition multidimensionnelle du risque , 2012 .

[33]  Adam Weintrit,et al.  Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation , 2009 .

[34]  Jürgen Hampel.  Different concepts of risk -- a challenge for risk communication. , 2006, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[35]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Uncertainty in maritime risk analysis: Extended case study on chemical tanker collisions , 2015 .

[36]  Leszek Smolarek,et al.  Risk Modelling for Passages in Approach Channel , 2013 .

[37]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Vulnerability, uncertainty, and risk : quantification, mitigation, and management : proceedings of the second International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM) and the sixth International Symposium on Undertainty [i.e. Uncertainty] Modeling and Analysis (ISUMA) : Ju , 2014 .

[38]  Fujio Kaneko,et al.  Methods for probabilistic safety assessments of ships , 2002 .

[39]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  Toke Koldborg Jensen,et al.  Empirical Ship Domain based on AIS Data , 2013, Journal of Navigation.

[41]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  On the Reliability and Validity of Ship–Ship Collision Risk Analysis in Light of Different Perspectives on Risk , 2014 .

[42]  Tony Rosqvist,et al.  On the validation of risk analysis - A commentary , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[43]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  Speaking the Truth in Maritime Risk Assessment , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[44]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  J. Mendel.  Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial , 1995, Proc. IEEE.

[46]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Expressing and communicating uncertainty and bias in relation to Quantitative Risk Analysis , 2015 .

[47]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Expressing and communicating uncertainty and bias in relation to Quantitative Risk Analysis , 2015 .

[48]  T. Aven,et al.  How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting , 2013 .

[49]  金湖 富士夫.  A Method for Estimation of Grounding Frequency by Using Trajectories of Ships and Geometry of Seabed(Summaries of Papers published by Staff of National Maritime Research Institute at Outside Organizations) , 2010 .

[50]  Blas Galván,et al.  Application of Dempster-Shafer theory for the quantification and propagation of the uncertainty caused by the use of AIS data , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[51]  F. J. Buzek,et al.  Collision cases, judgments and diagrams , 1984 .

[52]  J. Persson,et al.  Why separate risk assessors and risk managers? Further external values affecting the risk assessor qua risk assessor , 2010 .

[53]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  The logical status of risk – to burnish or to dull , 2010 .

[54]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[55]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Formal Safety Assessment: an updated review , 2012 .

[56]  H. Ligteringen,et al.  Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data , 2010 .

[57]  Fowler,et al.  Modeling Ship Transportation Risk , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[58]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  A Risk Management Procedure for the Washington State Ferries , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[59]  Ø. Solberg,et al.  Reflections on the ontological status of risk , 2012 .

[60]  J. Montewka,et al.  Modelling risk of a collision between a LNG tanker and a harbour tug , 2012 .

[61]  Terje Aven,et al.  Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context – Review and discussion , 2009 .

[62]  Terje Aven,et al.  Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[63]  Jung Sik Jeong,et al.  Risk Assessment Model of Maritime Traffic in Time-Variant CPA Environments in Waterway , 2012, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informatics.

[64]  Hervé Corvellec,et al.  Organizational Risk as it Derives from What Managers Value: A Practice-Based Approach to Risk Assessment , 2010 .

[65]  Tayfur Altiok,et al.  Risk Analysis of the Vessel Traffic in the Strait of Istanbul , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[66]  T Macduff,et al.  THE PROBABILITY OF VESSEL COLLISIONS , 1974 .

[67]  Trika Pitana,et al.  Fuzzy FMEA model for risk evaluation of ship collisions in the Malacca Strait: based on AIS data , 2014, J. Simulation.

[68]  Terje Aven,et al.  Some reflections on uncertainty analysis and management , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[69]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Marine traffic risk modelling – an innovative approach and a case study , 2011 .

[70]  Ozhan Alper Almaz,et al.  Risk and performance analysis of ports and waterways: the case of Delaware River and Bay , 2012 .

[71]  Manchun Li,et al.  Safety Assessment of Shipping Routes in the South China Sea Based on the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2014 .

[72]  Matthijs Kok,et al.  Inland waterway transport: modelling the probability of accidents , 1995 .

[73]  Stan Kaplan,et al.  The Words of Risk Analysis , 1997 .

[74]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  On a risk management analysis of oil spill risk using maritime transportation system simulation , 2011, Ann. Oper. Res..

[75]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers , 1983 .

[76]  P. Silveira,et al.  Use of AIS Data to Characterise Marine Traffic Patterns and Ship Collision Risk off the Coast of Portugal , 2013, Journal of Navigation.

[77]  M. Morris.  Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[78]  Terje Aven,et al.  Reliability and validity of risk analysis , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[79]  X. Qu,et al.  Vessel Collision Frequency Estimation in the Singapore Strait , 2012 .

[80]  Svein Kristiansen,et al.  Maritime Transportation: Safety Management and Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[81]  F. Goerlandt,et al.  Environmental risk of collisions in the enclosed European waters: Gulf of Finland, Northern Adriatic and the implications for tanker design. , 2010 .

[82]  Wahyudi,et al.  Development of ship sinking frequency model over Subsea Pipeline for Madura Strait using AIS data , 2014 .

[83]  Birnur Ozbas,et al.  Safety Risk Analysis of Maritime Transportation , 2013 .

[84]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the ontological status of the concept of risk , 2011 .

[85]  D. Dubois,et al.  Fuzzy Sets: History and Basic Notions , 2000 .

[86]  Ashim Kumar Debnath,et al.  Navigational traffic conflict technique: a proactive approach to quantitative measurement of collision risks in port waters , 2010 .

[87]  P. Slovic.  Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[88]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Influence of impact scenario models on collision risk analysis , 2012 .

[89]  Yacov Y Haimes,et al.  On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems‐Based Approach , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[90]  Sanna Sonninen,et al.  The implementation of the VTMIS system for the Gulf of Finland – a FSA study , 2022 .

[91]  W. Dean,et al.  Competing Conceptions of Risk , 1996 .

[92]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  A framework for risk assessment for maritime transportation systems - A case study for open sea collisions involving RoPax vessels , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[93]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  A Systems Approach to Managing Oil Transportation Risk in , 2000 .

[94]  Terje Aven,et al.  The risk concept - historical and recent development trends , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[95]  Terje Aven,et al.  Practical implications of the new risk perspectives , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[96]  Aravind Immaneni,et al.  A Structured Approach to Building Predictive Key Risk Indicators by , 2005 .

[97]  Shenping Hu,et al.  Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[98]  Risto Tuominen,et al.  Qualification of Formal Safety Assessment: an exploratory study , 2004 .

[99]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .

[100]  Heather Douglas.  Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal , 2009 .

[101]  Jin Wang,et al.  Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[102]  I. Turksen,et al.  Measurement of Membership Functions: Theoretical and Empirical Work , 2000 .

[103]  R. Perhac,et al.  Defining risk: Normative considerations , 1996 .

[104]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[105]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Assessing Grounding Frequency using Ship Traffic and Waterway Complexity , 2014, Journal of Navigation.

[106]  Birgitte Wandall.  Values in science and risk assessment. , 2004, Toxicology letters.

[107]  T. Aven.  Misconceptions of Risk , 2010 .

[108]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[109]  E. Rosa.  Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk , 1998 .

[110]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Simplified Risk Analysis of Tanker Collisions in the Gulf of Finland , 2012 .

[111]  K. Shrader-Frechette.  Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms , 1991 .

[112]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Modeling the risk of ship grounding—a literature review from a risk management perspective , 2014 .

[113]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[114]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Formal safety assessment: A critical review , 2009 .

[115]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system , 1998 .

[116]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[117]  Risk of Terrorism: A Scientifically Valid Phenomenon or a Wild Guess? The Impact of Different Approaches to Risk Assessment , 2010 .

[118]  J. K. Vaurio.  On the meaning of probability and frequency , 1990 .

[119]  Terje Aven,et al.  Interpretations of alternative uncertainty representations in a reliability and risk analysis context , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[120]  S. R. Watson,et al.  The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis , 1994 .

[121]  Åse Svensson,et al.  A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective , 1998 .