Role of shape and kinematics in human movement analysis

Human gait and activity analysis from video is presently attracting a lot of attention in the computer vision community. In this paper we analyze the role of two of the most important cues in human motion-shape and kinematics. We present an experimental framework whereby it is possible to evaluate the relative importance of these two cues in computer vision based recognition algorithms. In the process, we propose a new gait recognition algorithm by computing the distance between two sequences of shapes that lie on a spherical manifold. In our experiments, shape is represented using Kendall's definition of shape. Kinematics is represented using a Linear Dynamical system We place particular emphasis on human gait. Our conclusions show that shape plays a role which is more significant than kinematics in current automated gait based human identification algorithms. As a natural extension we study the role of shape and kinematics in activity recognition. Our experiments indicate that we require models that contain both shape and kinematics in order to perform accurate activity classification. These conclusions also allow us to explain the relative performance of many existing methods in computer-based human activity modeling.

[1]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace angles and distances between ARMA models , 2000 .

[2]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Subspace algorithms for the stochastic identification problem, , 1993, Autom..

[3]  Kinh Tieu,et al.  Learning pedestrian models for silhouette refinement , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  Dariu Gavrila,et al.  The Visual Analysis of Human Movement: A Survey , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[5]  Mark S. Nixon,et al.  Gait Extraction and Description by Evidence-Gathering , 1999 .

[6]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Identification of humans using gait , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Activity recognition using the dynamics of the configuration of interacting objects , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[8]  A. B. Drought,et al.  WALKING PATTERNS OF NORMAL MEN. , 1964, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  J. Cutting,et al.  Gait Perception as an Example of How We May Perceive Events , 1981 .

[10]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[11]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  Recognition of human gaits , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[12]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  A hidden Markov model based framework for recognition of humans from gait sequences , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[13]  Robert T. Collins,et al.  Silhouette-based human identification from body shape and gait , 2002, Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition.

[14]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  Dynamic Textures , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Sudeep Sarkar,et al.  The gait identification challenge problem: data sets and baseline algorithm , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[16]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[17]  Robert T. Collins,et al.  Gait Shape Estimation for Identification , 2003, AVBPA.

[18]  Aaron F. Bobick,et al.  Performance Analysis of Time-Distance Gait Parameters under Different Speeds , 2003, AVBPA.