Linear spectral unmixing assisted by probability guided and minimum residual exhaustive search for subpixel classification

For subpixel analysis of remotely sensed imagery, the requirement for a sufficient number of image bands is often a constraint to a linear mixing model, because the number of end members for land cover classification is usually larger than the number of bands when Thematic Mapper (TM) or SPOT imagery is utilized. This paper proposes two algorithmic approaches to resolve the constraint that only consider a subset of end members in each pixel's unmixing process: a minimum residual exhaustive search (MRES) algorithm and a probability‐guided (PG) process. The MRES method tests each possible subset and measures its residual. Once all possible scenarios have been tested, the subset which yields the minimum residual is found and its unmixing result is accepted as this pixel's constituents. The PG method calculates a pixel's posterior probability to each end member first and takes the end members which have the highest probabilities to form a subset. Then, a linear spectral unmixing procedure is applied to unmix the pixel into the subset. Case studies have shown that the PG method outperforms the MRES method.

[1]  John B. Adams,et al.  Quantitative subpixel spectral detection of targets in multispectral images. [terrestrial and planetary surfaces] , 1992 .

[2]  E. Ashton,et al.  Algorithms for the Detection of Su b-Pixel Targets in Multispectral Imagery , 1998 .

[3]  J. R. Eastman,et al.  Probability guided and minimum residual exhaustive searching approaches for subpixel classification , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[4]  J. Eastman,et al.  Bayesian Soft Classification for Sub-Pixel Analysis: A Critical Evaluation , 2002 .

[5]  Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro,et al.  The least-squares mixing models to generate fraction images derived from remote sensing multispectral data , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  R. Mccoy,et al.  Mapping Desert Shrub Rangeland Using Spectral Unmixing and Modeling Spectral Mixtures with TM Data , 1997 .

[7]  N. Campbell,et al.  Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum-likelihood classification , 1992 .

[8]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models , 1998 .

[9]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .

[10]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Mixed pixel classification with robust statistics , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  A. Cracknell Review article Synergy in remote sensing-what's in a pixel? , 1998 .

[12]  D. Roberts,et al.  Green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data , 1993 .

[13]  S. Twomey Introduction to the Mathematics of Inversion in Remote Sensing and Indirect Measurements , 1997 .

[14]  Maria Petrou,et al.  Mixture models with higher order moments , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Estimation of sub-pixel land cover composition in the presence of untrained classes , 2000 .

[16]  F. Wang Improving remote sensing image analysis through fuzzy information representation , 1990 .