Implementing a clinical decision-support system in practice: A qualitative analysis of influencing attitudes and characteristics among general practitioners

In order to obtain a better understanding of barriers to the implementation of clinical decision-support systems (CDSSs) in primary health care, we explored general practitioners' (GPs) handling of a CDSS during the implementation process. An Internet-based application for the management of chronic heart failure was used that was an adaptation of established clinical guidelines for computer use. The whole implementation process was followed closely, using a combination of different methods for data collection: repeated interviews with the five participating GPs, observations of patient visits, patient interviews, and detection of usage. We analysed the data using qualitative content analysis. The results showed that GPs' attitudes and characteristics constituted different profiles that seemed to be associated with the degree of acceptance of the CDSS. Those profiles were related to conceptions about the GPs' professional role and their attitudes towards the computer's function in disease management and in decision-making. Some additional barriers were insufficient level of computer skills and time constraints in everyday work. These findings can help us identify groups of GPs with definable needs during the implementation of a CDSS and make it easier to meet those needs with individually tailored interventions.

[1]  A F Jerant,et al.  Applied medical informatics and computing skills of students, residents, and faculty. , 2000, Family medicine.

[2]  Guidelines for the diagnosis of heart failure. The Task Force on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. , 1995, European heart journal.

[3]  Ian N. Purves,et al.  Multi-tasking in practice: Coordinated activities in the computer supported doctor-patient consultation , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  Steven H. Brown,et al.  Research Paper: Changes in Physicians' Computer Anxiety and Attitudes Related to Clinical Information System Use , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  W. Remme The treatment of heart failure. Task Force of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. , 1997, European heart journal.

[7]  D P Connelly,et al.  Computerized decision support systems in primary care. , 1995, Primary care.

[8]  Annette L. Valenta,et al.  Q-methodology: definition and application in health care informatics. , 1997, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[9]  D. Bates,et al.  Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  Martin Frischer,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Review: Computer-based Guideline Implementation Systems: A Systematic Review of Functionality and Effectiveness , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Carl R May,et al.  Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals. , 2002, Family practice.

[13]  L M Irwig,et al.  Evidence‐based medicine: useful tools for decision making , 2001, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Berg, Bruce L. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2007 , 2008, Inf. Res..

[15]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Implementing digital resources for clinicians' and patients' varying needs , 2005, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[16]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[17]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[18]  T. Payne Computer decision support systems. , 2000, Chest.

[19]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  Joyce A. Mitchell,et al.  The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials. , 1996, Archives of family medicine.

[22]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - clinical decision support systems literature review , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[23]  Elson Rb,et al.  Computerized decision support systems in primary care. , 1995 .

[24]  Patrik Eklund,et al.  Development and maintenance of guideline-based decision support for pharmacological treatment of hypertension , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[25]  D. R. Dixon,et al.  Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: survey instrument valuation , 2000, AMIA.

[26]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Subjectivist Approaches to Evaluation , 1997 .

[27]  H. C. Coumou,et al.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[28]  Fiona Chew,et al.  Doctors on-line: using diffusion of innovations theory to understand internet use. , 2004, Family medicine.

[29]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Evaluation of health information systems - problems and challenges , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[31]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[32]  Nick Booth,et al.  Identification of high-quality consultation practice in primary care: the effects of computer use on doctor-patient rapport. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.