Integrated magnetic and kinetic control of advanced tokamak plasmas on DIII-D based on data-driven models

The first real-time profile control experiments integrating magnetic and kinetic variables were performed on DIII-D in view of regulating and extrapolating advanced tokamak scenarios to steady-state devices and burning plasma experiments. Device-specific, control-oriented models were obtained from experimental data using a generic two-time-scale method that was validated on JET, JT-60U and DIII-D under the framework of the International Tokamak Physics Activity for Integrated Operation Scenarios (Moreau et al 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 063009). On DIII-D, these data-driven models were used to synthesize integrated magnetic and kinetic profile controllers. The neutral beam injection (NBI), electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) systems and ohmic coil provided the heating and current drive (H&CD) sources. The first control actuator was the plasma surface loop voltage (i.e. the ohmic coil), and the available beamlines and gyrotrons were grouped to form five additional H&CD actuators: co-current on-axis NBI, co-current off-axis NBI, counter-current NBI, balanced NBI and total ECCD power from all gyrotrons (with off-axis current deposition). Successful closed-loop experiments showing the control of (a) the poloidal flux profile, Ψ(x), (b) the poloidal flux profile together with the normalized pressure parameter, βN, and (c) the inverse of the safety factor profile, , are described.

[1]  L. Lao,et al.  Reconstruction of current profile parameters and plasma shapes in tokamaks , 1985 .

[2]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Singular perturbation methods in control : analysis and design , 1986 .

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[4]  Didier Mazon,et al.  Feedback control of the safety factor profile evolution during formation of an advanced tokamak discharge , 2006 .

[5]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  A two-time-scale dynamic-model approach for magnetic and kinetic profile control in advanced tokamak scenarios on JET , 2008 .

[6]  A. D. Turnbull,et al.  Optimizing stability, transport, and divertor operation through plasma shaping for steady-state scenario development in DIII-D , 2009 .

[7]  Naoyuki Oyama,et al.  Overview of JT-60U results towards the establishment of advanced tokamak operation , 2009 .

[8]  T. Fujita,et al.  Core transport properties in JT-60U and JET identity plasmas , 2011 .

[9]  T. L. Rhodes,et al.  Optimization of the safety factor profile for high noninductive current fraction discharges in DIII-D , 2011 .

[10]  R. J. La Haye,et al.  Plasma models for real-time control of advanced tokamak scenarios , 2011 .

[11]  R. H. Bulmer,et al.  Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment (SSPX): design and physics results , 2012 .

[12]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  State-of-the-art neoclassical tearing mode control in DIII-D using real-time steerable electron cyclotron current drive launchers , 2014 .