A Systematic Review of Interventions to Follow-Up Test Results Pending at Discharge

BackgroundPatients are frequently discharged from the hospital before all test results have been finalized. Thirty to 40% of tests pending at discharge (TPADs) return potentially actionable results that could necessitate change in the patients’ management, often unbeknownst to their physicians. Delayed follow-up of TPADs can lead to patient harm. We sought to synthesize the existing literature on interventions intended to improve the management of TPADs, including interventions designed to enhance documentation of TPADs, increase physician awareness when TPAD results finalize post-discharge, decrease adverse events related to missed TPADs, and increase physician satisfaction with TPAD management.MethodsWe searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Database of Controlled Clinical Trials and Medline (January 1, 2000–November 10, 2016) for randomized controlled trials and prospective, controlled observational studies that evaluated interventions to improve follow-up of TPADs for adult patients discharged from acute care hospitals or emergency department settings. From each study we extracted characteristics of the intervention being evaluated and its impact on TPAD management.ResultsNine studies met the criteria for inclusion. Six studies evaluated electronic discharge summary templates with a designated field for documenting TPADs, and three of six of these studies reported a significant improvement in documentation of TPADs in discharge summaries in pre- and post-intervention analysis. One study reported that auditing discharge summaries and providing feedback to physicians were associated with improved TPAD documentation in discharge summaries. Two studies found that email alerts when TPADs were finalized improved physicians' awareness of the results and documentation of their follow-up actions. Of the four studies that assessed patient morbidity, two showed a positive effect; however, none specifically measured the impact of their interventions on downstream patient harm due to delayed follow-up of TPADs. Three studies surveyed physicians’ attitudes towards the interventions, of which two studies reported improved physician satisfaction with TPAD management with the implementation of an enhanced discharge template and a notification system when TPADs finalize.DiscussionDischarge summary templates, educational interventions for discharging physicians, and email alerts when TPAD results are finalized show promise in improving management of TPADs. Given the complexity of the processes necessary to ensure follow-up of TPADs, rigorous evaluations of multifaceted interventions (e.g., improved discharge documentation of TPADs combined with email alerts when results become available) is needed.

[1]  W M Tierney,et al.  Using computerized provider order entry to enforce documentation of tests with pending results at hospital discharge. , 2012, Applied clinical informatics.

[2]  D. Baker,et al.  Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. , 2007, JAMA.

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Reducing missed laboratory results: defining temporal responsibility, generating user interfaces for test process tracking, and retrospective analyses to identify problems. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[4]  Eric G. Poon,et al.  Impact of Automated Alerts on Follow-Up of Post-Discharge Microbiology Results: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  J. Weissman,et al.  Redefining and Redesigning Hospital Discharge to Enhance Patient Care: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  Martin C. Were,et al.  Adequacy of Hospital Discharge Summaries in Documenting Tests with Pending Results and Outpatient Follow-up Providers , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  Stephen A. Martin,et al.  A Reengineered Hospital Discharge Program to Decrease Rehospitalization , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Christopher L. Roy,et al.  Patient Safety Concerns Arising from Test Results That Return after Hospital Discharge , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Robert H. Brook,et al.  Prospective Payment System and Impairment at Discharge , 1990 .

[10]  Michael W. Smith,et al.  Primary care practitioners’ views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[12]  Kevin J O'Leary,et al.  Creating a better discharge summary: improvement in quality and timeliness using an electronic discharge summary. , 2009, Journal of hospital medicine.

[13]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Failure to Follow-Up Test Results for Ambulatory Patients: A Systematic Review , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[14]  Kambria H. Evans,et al.  Pending Studies at Hospital Discharge: A Pre-post Analysis of an Electronic Medical Record Tool to Improve Communication at Hospital Discharge , 2015, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[15]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: Methods of a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[16]  Catherine Yoon,et al.  Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: a study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[18]  D Draper,et al.  Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The 'quicker-and-sicker' story revisited. , 1990, JAMA.

[19]  J. Aldag,et al.  Patient readmissions, emergency visits, and adverse events after software-assisted discharge from hospital: cluster randomized trial. , 2009, Journal of hospital medicine.

[20]  Helen Fernandez,et al.  Audit and feedback: an intervention to improve discharge summary completion. , 2011, Journal of hospital medicine.

[21]  D. Bates,et al.  The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients after Discharge from the Hospital , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  S. Dovey,et al.  Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[23]  David W. Bates,et al.  Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  W. Hendee To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System , 2001 .

[25]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2011, Implementation science : IS.