Communicating Ideas Purposefully - toward a Design Theory of Innovation Artifacts

Fostering innovation is an essential task for companies, particularly in the dynamic and constantly changing software industry. Whereas it is widely acknowledged that the innovative capacity of a company depends crucially on how well it supports employees in realizing ideas, there is a lack of explicit, practitioner-oriented guidance on how these can communicate their ideas purposefully. We contribute to this field with an exploratory field study, in which we interviewed 32 experienced innovators at a major Swiss banking software provider, and collected objects through which they communicated ideas. We analyzed the collected data applying three types of causal analysis – creative causation, active causation, and passive causation. The outcome of this research is a nascent design theory that provides structured prescriptions on how to communicate ideas through what we term “innovation artifacts”. In brief terms, our study shows that innovation artifacts should enable innovators to persuade and collaborate with relevant stakeholders.

[1]  Dennis Schoeneborn,et al.  The Pervasive Power of PowerPoint: How a Genre of Professional Communication Permeates Organizational Communication , 2013 .

[2]  R. Hisrich,et al.  Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation , 2001 .

[3]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Theorizing in Design Science Research , 2011, DESRIST.

[4]  Frederik Ahlemann,et al.  Exploiting Is/It Projects' Potential - Towards A Design Theory For Benefits Management , 2013, ECIS.

[5]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[6]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in the Development of New Technology Concepts , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Alexander Richter,et al.  The Contextual Nature Of Enterprise Social Networking: A Multi Case Study Comparison , 2013, ECIS.

[8]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  Cognitive Processes of Opportunity Recognition: The Role of Structural Alignment , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Sven-Volker Rehm,et al.  Composite Boundary Objects In Inter-Organizational Innovation Activities , 2013, ECIS.

[12]  Kaj U. Koskinen Metaphoric boundary objects as co‐ordinating mechanisms in the knowledge sharing of innovation processes , 2005 .

[13]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[14]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating and Transforming: an Integrative Relational Approach to Sharing and Assessing Knowledge across Boundaries , 2003 .

[15]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  Managing Innovation Driven Companies: Approaches in Practice , 2010 .

[16]  Doll. Bernhard Prototyping zur Unterstützung sozialer Interaktionsprozesse , 2009 .

[17]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[18]  R. Weber Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[19]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  The persuasive power of PowerPoint® presentations , 2011, PERSUASIVE '11.

[20]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[21]  Oscar Gutierrez Prototyping techniques for different problem contexts , 1989, CHI '89.

[22]  David R. Shaffer,et al.  Vividness Can Undermine or Enhance Message Processing: The Moderating Role of Vividness Congruency , 2000 .

[23]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[24]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Allison W. McCulloch,et al.  Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project , 2011 .

[26]  J. Yates The PowerPoint Presentation and Its Corollaries: How Genres Shape Communicative Action in Organizations , 2004 .

[27]  J. Marshall Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[28]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Causality: the elephant in the room in information systems epistemology , 2011, ECIS.

[29]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Paper prototyping - what is it good for?: a comparison of paper- and computer-based low-fidelity prototyping , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  C. Weston,et al.  Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding System , 2001 .

[31]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[32]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[33]  Chris Kimble,et al.  Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[34]  Nicholas J Carson Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives, John Palfrey, Urs Gasser. Basic Books, New York (2008), 375 pp, $25.95 (hardcover) , 2010 .

[35]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Reflection, Abstraction And Theorizing In Design And Development Research , 2013, ECIS.

[36]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Integrating Inside and Outside Innovators: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective , 2009 .

[37]  Katja Thoring,et al.  Understanding Artifact Knowledge in Design Science: Prototypes and Products as Knowledge Repositories , 2011, AMCIS.

[38]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Lutz Maicher,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Interactive Innovation , 2013, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[40]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[41]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[42]  Robert D. Hisrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship, intrapreneurship, and venture capital: The foundation of economic renaissance , 1986 .

[43]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[46]  J. Kohnen,et al.  Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant , 2006 .

[47]  Richard P. Nielsen,et al.  Intrapreneurship strategy for internal markets — corporate, non‐profit and government institution cases , 1985 .

[48]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[49]  Philip O'Regan,et al.  Governance structures and innovation in the Irish Software Industry , 2008 .

[50]  Martin Wiener,et al.  Challenges and Dilemmas in Open Innovation: Ambidexterity as Management Approach , 2013, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[51]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. , 1982 .

[52]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[53]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Contextualising Media Choice Using Genre Analysis , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[54]  Bruno Latour,et al.  On Interobjectivity , 2002 .

[55]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[57]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[59]  Kevin C. Desouza Intrapreneurship: Managing Ideas Within Your Organization , 2011 .