On the history of deformation phosphenes and the idea of internal light generated in the eye for the purpose of vision

Deformation phosphenes are light sensations evoked by deformation of the eyeball in total darkness. They were first reported in Western literature by Alcmaeon of Croton in the fifth century B.C. The phenomenon of deformation phosphenes was instrumental in prompting some pre-Socratic philosophers and Plato to conceive the idea that efferent light is emitted from the eye for the purpose of vision and a ‘cone of vision’ is formed by interaction with the external light. In the theories of vision this cone of vision played an important role as a signal-transmitting structure and was also used by the Greek opticians as a geometrical construction to explain optical properties of vision.The impact of the deformation phosphene experiment on the ideas of visual sensation can be followed from Greek antiquity through the period of Roman dominance and Galen's medical teaching on to medieval times and up to the late Renaissance when, based on the anatomy of the eye as illustrated by Felix Platter, the image formation on the retina was correctly described for the first time by Johannes Kepler. In the generations following, deformation phosphenes were still employed as an important argument in defence of the theories of vision. However, the idea of physical light generated by eyeball deformation was rejected with increasing frequency during the 17th and 18th centuries. The literature on this topic is discussed, comprising the contributions of the Arabic philosophers and physicians of the 9th and 10th centuries A.D., the Franciscan and Dominican philosophers of the 13th century, Nicolaus Cusanus of the 15th century, several anatomists of the 16th and 17th centuries, Kepler, Plempius, Descartes, Boyle, Newton and others. After Kepler, the mechanical interpretation of the deformation phosphene being caused by direct action of the eyeball deformation onto the retina slowly became dominant, and the idea that physical light is generated in the eye disappeared.The experimentum crucis in this matter was performed by Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682–1771) and repeated and extended by Georg August Langguth (1711–1782). On the basis of their results, the case for physical light being generated in the eye by deformation was refuted definitively and slowly vanished thereafter from scientific literature. Deformation phosphenes were used in the 19th and 20th centuries as an instructive example of the percepts evoked by inadequate stimulation of a sense organ. J.E. Pûrkyne in particular contributed to the study of deformation phosphenes, and finally in 1978, F. Tyler devoted a careful study to the differences between monocular and binocular deformation phosphenes. Finally some remarks on the neurophysiological interpretation of deformation phosphenes, based on microelectrode recordings of the activity of single retinal ganglion cells, are added to the historical report.

[1]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Interaction of efferent and afferent signals in visual perception. A history of ideas and experimental paradigms. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[2]  N. Ferrero Leonardo da Vinci: of the eye; an original new translation from Codex D. , 1952, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Gerard Watson,et al.  The Stoic theory of knowledge , 1966 .

[4]  D. Lindberg,et al.  Theories of vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler , 1977, Medical History.

[5]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Responses of retinal ganglion cells to eyeball deformation: A neurophysiological basis for “pressure phosphenes” , 1989, Vision Research.

[6]  Epikur,et al.  Philosophie der Freude , 1953 .

[7]  W. Risse,et al.  Opera Omnia Philosophica , 1985 .

[8]  E. Jackson Opticks: or a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections and colours of light. , 1932 .

[9]  G. A. Lindeboom DESCARTES AND MEDICINE , 1951, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  Theophrastus and the Greek physiological psychology before Aristotle , 1964 .

[11]  L. Baur,et al.  Die philosophischen Werke des Robert Grosseteste, Bischofs von Lincoln , 1912 .

[12]  Kenneth D. Keele Galen on Sense Perception , 1971, Medical History.

[13]  P. R. Heyl The Opus Majus of Roger Bacon , 1929 .

[14]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Some new entoptic phenomena , 1978, Vision Research.

[15]  M. Rubin Galen on Sense Perception , 1970 .

[16]  O. Grüsser,et al.  The effect of dark adaptation on the responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to eyeball deformation , 1989, Vision Research.

[17]  E. Cassirer,et al.  Individuum Und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance Die Platonische Renaissance in England Und Die Schule von Cambridge , 1927 .

[18]  A. L. Hilliard,et al.  Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker , 1952 .

[19]  Grüsser Oj J.E. Purkynĕ's contributions to the physiology of the visual, the vestibular and the oculomotor systems. , 1984 .

[20]  Die Psychologie Alhazens Auf Grund von Alhazens Optik , 1911 .

[21]  Johann Clauberg Opera Omnia Philosophica , 1968 .

[22]  J. Duranmolina De sedibus et causis morborum , 1972 .

[23]  Clemens Baeumker Beitrage zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters. , 1893 .