Imaging Artifacts and Segmentation Errors With Wide-Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy

Purpose To analyze imaging artifacts and segmentation errors with wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods We conducted a prospective, observational study at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from December 2018 to March 2019. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), diabetic patients with no diabetic retinopathy (DR), and healthy control eyes were included. All patients were imaged with a SS-OCTA and the Montage Angio (15 × 9 mm) was used for analysis. Images were independently evaluated by two graders using the motion artifact score (MAS). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 and R software. Results One hundred thirty-six eyes in 98 participants with the montage image were included in the study. Patients with more severe stages of DR had higher MAS by trend test analysis (P < 0.05). The occurrence of segmentation error was 0% in the healthy group, 10.53% in the no DR group, 10.00% in the NPDR group, and 50% in the PDR group. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the severity of DR and dry eye were the major factors affecting MAS (P < 0.05). There were some modifiable artifacts that could be corrected to improve image quality. Conclusions Wide field SS-OCTA assesses retinal microvascular changes by noninvasive techniques, yet distinguishing real alterations from artifacts is paramount to accurate interpretations. DR severity and dry eye correlated with MAS. Translational Relevance Understanding contributing factors and methods to reduce artifacts is critical to routine use and clinical trial with wide-field SS-OCTA.

[1]  Ruikang K. Wang,et al.  Ultra-wide optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy. , 2018, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[2]  José Álvaro Pereira Gomes,et al.  Effect of a light-emitting timer device on the blink rate of non-dry eye individuals and dry eye patients , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[3]  S. Saidha,et al.  Image Artifacts in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis , 2019, Current eye research.

[4]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY , 2015, Retina.

[5]  P. Rosenfeld,et al.  Longitudinal Wide-Field Swept-Source OCT Angiography of Neovascularization in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy after Panretinal Photocoagulation. , 2019, Ophthalmology. Retina.

[6]  M. Treder,et al.  Prevalences of segmentation errors and motion artifacts in OCT-angiography differ among retinal diseases , 2018, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[7]  A. Caporossi,et al.  Detecting papillary neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography , 2018, Acta ophthalmologica.

[8]  C. Shields,et al.  IMAGE QUALITY AND ARTIFACTS ON OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY: Comparison of Pathologic and Paired Fellow Eyes in 65 Patients With Unilateral Choroidal Melanoma Treated With Plaque Radiotherapy , 2017, Retina.

[9]  James G. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography angiography , 2017, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[10]  S. Vinker,et al.  Dry eye in diabetic patients. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  B. Lujan,et al.  Importance of Focus in OCT Angiography. , 2018, Ophthalmology. Retina.

[12]  Glenn J Jaffe,et al.  Evaluation of artifacts associated with macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[13]  Jens Dreyhaupt,et al.  Quantity and quality of image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography , 2019, PloS one.

[14]  Steven T. Bailey,et al.  DETECTION OF CLINICALLY UNSUSPECTED RETINAL NEOVASCULARIZATION WITH WIDE-FIELD OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY. , 2019, Retina.

[15]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Blinking and Tear Break-Up During Four Visual Tasks , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  Ding Chen,et al.  Characteristics of Neovascularization in Early Stages of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  R. Ramanjulu,et al.  Vitreous opacities causing artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography , 2017, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  M. Pistilli,et al.  Tear osmolarity and dry eye symptoms in diabetics , 2011, Clinical ophthalmology.

[19]  Eric M. Moult,et al.  QUANTIFICATION OF RETINAL CAPILLARY NONPERFUSION IN DIABETICS USING WIDE-FIELD OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY. , 2020, Retina.

[20]  Max Loidl,et al.  Präzise Befundung mit der OCT-Angiografie – Artefakte erkennen und ausschließen , 2017, Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde.

[21]  Marco Rispoli,et al.  IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF RETINAL VASCULARIZATION MORPHOLOGY USING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY , 2015, Retina.

[22]  P. Heiduschka,et al.  Impact of eye-tracking technology on OCT-angiography imaging quality in age-related macular degeneration , 2017, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[23]  Lloyd Paul Aiello,et al.  Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[24]  Gangjun Liu,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  David J. Wilson,et al.  OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY FEATURES OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY , 2015, Retina.

[26]  Christian Enders,et al.  [Accurate OCT-angiography Interpretation - Detection and Exclusion of Artifacts]. , 2017, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.