Quality metrics for optical signals: Eye diagram, Q-factor, OSNR, EVM and BER

Measuring the quality of optical signals is one of the most important tasks in optical communications. A variety of metrics are available, namely the general shape of the eye diagram, the optical signal-to-noise power ratio (OSNR), the Q-factor as a measure of the eye opening, the error vector magnitude (EVM) that is especially suited for quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) formats, and the bit error ratio (BER). While the BER is the most conclusive quality determinant, it is sometimes difficult to quantify, especially for simulations and off-line processing. We compare various metrics analytically, by simulation, and through experiments. We further discuss BER estimates derived from OSNR, Q-factor and EVM data and compare them to measurements employing six modulation formats at symbol rates of 20 GBd and 25 GBd, which were generated by a software-defined transmitter. We conclude that for optical channels with additive Gaussian noise the EVM metric is a reliable quality measure. For nondata-aided reception, BER below 0.01 can be estimated from measured EVM.

[1]  R.A. Shafik,et al.  On the Extended Relationships Among EVM, BER and SNR as Performance Metrics , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[2]  R Schmogrow,et al.  Real-Time Software-Defined Multiformat Transmitter Generating 64QAM at 28 GBd , 2010, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[3]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Approaching the Non-Linear Shannon Limit , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  A. J. Phillips,et al.  Optical signal quality metric based on statistical moments and Laguerre expansion , 2008 .

[5]  Vìtor Ribeiro,et al.  Optical performance monitoring using the novel parametric asynchronous eye diagram. , 2012, Optics express.

[6]  W. Freude,et al.  Fast split-step wavelet collocation method for WDM system parameter optimization , 2005, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  P. Humblet,et al.  On the bit error rate of lightwave systems with optical amplifiers , 1991 .

[8]  S. Personick Receiver design for digital fiber optic communication systems, II , 1973 .

[9]  Wolfg.ng Freude Positive definite and unimodal Gauss-Hermite expansion of probability density functions , 1991 .

[10]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[11]  Michel C. Jeruchim,et al.  Techniques for Estimating the Bit Error Rate in the Simulation of Digital Communication Systems , 1984, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[12]  M. Winter,et al.  Error Vector Magnitude as a Performance Measure for Advanced Modulation Formats , 2012, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[13]  Hüseyin Arslan,et al.  Error vector magnitude to SNR conversion for nondata-aided receivers , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  M. Bischoff,et al.  Optical CPFSK receiver with BER <10/sup -9/: Monte Carlo simulation and experiment , 1993 .

[15]  D. Marcuse Derivation of analytical expressions for the bit-error probability in lightwave systems with optical amplifiers , 1990 .

[16]  D. Marcuse Calculation of Bit-Error Probability for a Lightwave System with Optical Amplifiers and Post-Detection , 1991 .

[17]  P. Winzer,et al.  Capacity Limits of Optical Fiber Networks , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.