Analysing IOIS adoption through structural contradictions

Despite extensive research and practitioner literature on inter-organizational information systems (IOIS), our understanding of non-adoption still has some under-explored issues. This paper offers an explanation of non-adoption that focuses on the potential structural changes that IOIS adoption entails; in particular, we contend that the contradictions between the initial social structure and the structure enacted in the use of an IOIS can be a cause of non-adoption. This paper analyses adoption from a logic of opposition where non-adoption occurs because forces of transformation are offset by forces of persistence. Relying on the concepts of social structure, duality of structure, and structural contradiction from Structuration theory, we develop a framework that categorizes the underlying social structure where an IOIS is to be adopted, and formulate some theoretical propositions. From a practitioner perspective, this paper contends that the fact that IOIS management uncovers the contradictions in the social structure that result from IOIS adoption can help avoid dead ends. Accordingly, this framework, which can be used as a coarse-grained picture for anticipating adoption problems, can inform managers when devising an IOIS implementation strategy.

[1]  Ilyoo B. Hong,et al.  A new framework for interorganizational systems based on the linkage of participants' roles , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[2]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry , 1997 .

[3]  Jonathan Wareham,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Empirical Research on Interorganizational Systems: Assessing Past Contributions and Guiding Future Directions , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  M. Quaddus,et al.  An Investigation into the Factors Influencing the Adoption of B2B Trading Exchanges in Small Businesses in Western Australia , 2005, PACIS.

[5]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  A Multilevel Analysis of eHub Adoption and Consequences , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[6]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[7]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Interorganizational System Standards Development in Vertical Industries , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[8]  Vivek Choudhury,et al.  Strategic Choices in the Development of Interorganizational Information Systems , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  A theory of industry-level activity for understanding the adoption of interorganizational systems , 2000, ECIS.

[10]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.

[11]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[12]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[13]  M. Barrett Challenges of EDI adoption for electronic trading in the London Insurance Market , 1999 .

[14]  BohWai Fong,et al.  Standards development and diffusion , 2007 .

[15]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[16]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Analyzing inter-organizational systems from a power and interest perspective , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[19]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Eric van Heck,et al.  Re-Engineering the Dutch Flower Auctions: A Framework for Analyzing Exchange Organizations , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Catherine Chu,et al.  E‐business and organizational change: a structurational approach , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Kai Reimers Standardizing the New E-Business Platform: Learning From the EDI Experience , 2001, Electron. Mark..

[23]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Craig Standing,et al.  A framework to assess the factors affecting success or failure of the implementation of government-supported regional e-marketplaces for SMEs , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Christina Soh,et al.  Standards development and diffusion: a case study of RosettaNet , 2007, CACM.

[28]  Raluca Bunduchi,et al.  Shaping IT Standardization in the Automotive Industry - The Role of Power in Driving Portal Standardization , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[29]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Michael R. Vitale,et al.  Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information Systems , 1988, MIS Q..

[31]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[32]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[33]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  The Merchant of Prato - Revisited: Toward a Third Rationality of Information Systems , 1998, MIS Q..

[34]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Binary trading relations and the limits of EDI standards: the Procrustean bed of standards , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[36]  Michael Parent,et al.  A model of electronic commerce adoption by small voluntary organizations , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..