The Challenges of Precision Oncology Drug Development and Implementation

The drivers of precision medicine are clear: for patients (and physicians) - more options, durable clinical benefit, reduced exposure to non-effective drugs and potential to leverage current scientific and technological advances; for the pharmaceutical industry - the potential to tackle core challenges in discovering and developing better and more efficacious medicines, to reduce rates of attrition in drug development and to reduce development costs; for healthcare systems and payers - improved efficiency through the provision of effective care and avoiding ineffective treatments. Oncology has been at the vanguard, the improvements gained in patient survival notable. However, the increasing number of molecular subgroups requires an equally increasing number (and new generation) of highly selective agents targeting inevitably lower incidence molecular segments. Innovative trial designs (umbrella/basket studies) are emerging as a patient-centric approach to drug development, and the rise in public-private partnerships, cross-industry, government and non-profit sector collaborations is enabling implementation of complex clinical trial designs. This poses significant challenges for healthcare systems and regulatory approval. Further substantial evolution of policy and processes, particularly regulatory requirements for approval for new therapeutics, are required.

[1]  R. McCormack,et al.  Gefitinib Treatment in EGFR Mutated Caucasian NSCLC , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[2]  C Sotiriou,et al.  The AURORA initiative for metastatic breast cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  C. Lindsay,et al.  Lessons for molecular diagnostics in oncology from the Cancer Research UK Stratified Medicine Programme , 2015, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[4]  M. Guyer,et al.  Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside , 2011, Nature.

[5]  A. Eggermont,et al.  Molecular screening for cancer treatment optimization: MOSCATO 01 - A prospective molecular triage trial, interim results , 2013 .

[6]  A. Biankin,et al.  Mining the genomes of exceptional responders , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[7]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: theoretical considerations and practical challenges. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Marc E. Lenburg,et al.  Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657) , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[9]  C. Printz,et al.  Failure rate: Why many cancer drugs don't receive FDA approval, and what can be done about it , 2015, Cancer.

[10]  Razelle Kurzrock,et al.  Personalized Medicine in a Phase I Clinical Trials Program: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Initiative , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  M. Pangalos,et al.  Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca's drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework , 2014, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  Paul Workman,et al.  Envisioning the future of early anticancer drug development , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  Jodi G. Daniel,et al.  Re: Request for Comment: Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA): Request for Comments on the Development of a Risk-Based Regulatory Framework and Strategy for Health Information Technology , 2013 .

[14]  Alex M. Fichtenholtz,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  J. Kench,et al.  Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer , 2015, Nature.

[16]  D. Berry,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancers are more likely to present as Interval Cancers: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657, InterSPORE Trial) , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[17]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[18]  L. Siu,et al.  Cancer genomics: the challenge of drug accessibility , 2015, Current opinion in oncology.

[19]  P. Jänne,et al.  AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Molecular Profiling of Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Matched Targeted Therapy in Phase I Clinical Trials , 2012, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[21]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  L. Esserman,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.

[23]  I. Hickie,et al.  Disclosure Statement , 2011, The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.

[24]  David M. Thomas,et al.  Precision Medicine for Advanced Pancreas Cancer: The Individualized Molecular Pancreatic Cancer Therapy (IMPaCT) Trial , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  Nola Hylton,et al.  Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Jan Bogaerts,et al.  Designing transformative clinical trials in the cancer genome era. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  A. Gemma,et al.  F1000 highlights , 2010 .

[28]  D. Gandara,et al.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Richard Simon,et al.  Implementing personalized cancer genomics in clinical trials , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.