Views of householders and lay disciples in the Sutta Pitaka : A reconsideration of the lay/monastic opposition
暂无分享,去创建一个
Abstract Many scholars have argued that early Buddhism was primarily an ‘other‐worldly’ religion focusing on ascetics and monastics. In their view, the laity does not figure prominently, it was only centuries later that the laity's involvement became more noticeable. By examining references to householders (gahapati) and lay disciples (upāsaka) in the Sutta Pitaka section of the Pāli canon, this article challenges the view that the role of the laity primarily pertained to supporting the monastics with food, clothing, and shelter.
[1] G. Schopen. Bones, Stones, and Buddhist Monks: Collected Papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India , 1997 .
[2] É. Lamotte,et al. History of Indian Buddhism: From the origins to the Saka era , 1990 .
[3] A. P. Buddhadatta. Pāli-English dictionary , 1969 .
[4] G. Obeyesekere. Theodicy, Sin, and Salvation in a Sociology of Buddhism , 1968 .
[5] E. Conzé. Buddhist Thought in India: Three Phases of Buddhist Philosophy , 1962 .