A super-martingale property of the optimal portfolio process

Abstract. We show that, for a utility function having reasonable asymptotic elasticity , the optimal investment process is a super-martingale under each equivalent martingale measure , such that , where V is the conjugate function of U. Similar results for the special case of the exponential utility were recently obtained by Delbaen, Grandits, Rheinländer, Samperi, Schweizer, Stricker as well as Kabanov, Stricker. This result gives rise to a rather delicate analysis of the “good definition” of “allowed” trading strategies H for a financial market S. One offspring of these considerations leads to the subsequent - at first glance paradoxical - example. There is a financial market consisting of a deterministic bond and two risky financial assets such that, for an agent whose preferences are modeled by expected exponential utility at time T, it is optimal to constantly hold one unit of asset S1. However, if we pass to the market consisting only of the bond and the first risky asset S1, and leaving the information structure unchanged, this trading strategy is not optimal any more: in this smaller market it is optimal to invest t he initial endowment into the bond.

[1]  M. Yor.  DIFFUSIONS, MARKOV PROCESSES AND MARTINGALES: Volume 2: Itô Calculus , 1989 .

[2]  S. Shreve,et al.  Martingale and duality methods for utility maximization in a incomplete market , 1991 .

[3]  E. Strasser.  Necessary and sufficient conditions for the supermartingale property of a stochastic integral with respect to a local martingale , 2003 .

[4]  L. Rogers,et al.  Diffusions, Markov processes, and martingales , 1979 .

[5]  W. Schachermayer,et al.  A COUNTER-EXAMPLE TO SEVERAL PROBLEMS IN THE THEORY OF ASSET PRICING , 1993 .

[6]  J. Harrison,et al.  Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading , 1981 .

[7]  Walter Schachermayer,et al.  How Potential Investments may Change the Optimal Portfolio for the Exponential Utility , 2002 .

[8]  Michel Émery,et al.  Compensation de processus à variation finie non localement intégrables , 1980 .

[9]  W. Schachermayer,et al.  The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets , 1999 .

[10]  C. Stricker.  Simple strategies in exponential utility maximization , 2003 .

[11]  Marco Frittelli,et al.  On the Existence of Minimax Martingale Measures , 2002 .

[12]  P. Protter.  Stochastic integration and differential equations , 1990 .

[13]  Christophe Stricker,et al.  Couverture des actifs contingents et prix maximum , 1994 .

[14]  Y. Kabanov,et al.  On the optimal portfolio for the exponential utility maximization: remarks to the six‐author paper , 2002 .

[15]  N. Karoui.  Les Aspects Probabilistes Du Controle Stochastique , 1981 .

[16]  Jan Kallsen,et al.  Utility-Based Derivative Pricing in Incomplete Markets , 2002 .

[17]  F. Delbaen,et al.  A general version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing , 1994 .

[18]  W. Schachermayer.  Optimal investment in incomplete markets when wealth may become negative , 2001 .

[19]  Walter Schachermayer,et al.  A Simple Counterexample to Several Problems in the Theory of Asset Pricing , 1993 .

[20]  F. Delbaen,et al.  Exponential Hedging and Entropic Penalties , 2002 .

[21]  I. Csiszár.  $I$-Divergence Geometry of Probability Distributions and Minimization Problems , 1975 .

[22]  M. Frittelli.  The Minimal Entropy Martingale Measure and the Valuation Problem in Incomplete Markets , 2000 .

[23]  W. Schachermayer,et al.  THE BANACH SPACE OF WORKABLE CONTINGENT CLAIMS IN ARBITRAGE THEORY. L’ESPACE DE BANACH DES ACTIFS , 1998 .

[24]  Peter Grandits,et al.  On the minimal entropy martingale measure , 2002 .

[25]  J. Jacod.  Calcul stochastique et problèmes de martingales , 1979 .

[26]  F. Delbaen,et al.  The fundamental theorem of asset pricing for unbounded stochastic processes , 1998 .