A comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Classification Approaches for Fountain Data Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless Sensor Networks attract nowadays a great deal of not only research but also the industrial. It is deployed in a variety of area such as military, health care, monitoring. Energy is the main challenge of this network. When providing fountain codes with the assistance of training machine learning models, their ability to accurately determine the needed number of encoded packets significantly improves. In this paper, we discussed and compared our proposed distributed estimation scheme with some machine learning based methods for data classification. Simulations show that our proposed scheme which is based on the Bayesian model looks advantageous over other methods. Consequently, we can determine the needed number of encoded packets to recover initial data with appreciable accuracy and error rate notably low.

[1]  Keith Worden,et al.  Fault diagnosis of wind turbine structures using decision tree learning algorithms with big data , 2018, Safety and Reliability – Safe Societies in a Changing World.

[2]  Arpita Ghosh,et al.  A Classification Algorithm to Reduce Data Redundancy in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2018 .

[3]  Ridha Bouallegue,et al.  Fountain Data Estimation within Bayesian model Classification in Wireless Sensor Network , 2018, 2018 26th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM).

[4]  Nelson Luis Saldanha da Fonseca First Quarter 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials , 2009, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials.

[5]  Ye Yuan,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of SVM, Naive Bayes and GBDT for Data Faults Detection in WSNs , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C).

[6]  Chenhao Tan,et al.  Selecting Directors Using Machine Learning , 2018, The Review of Financial Studies.

[7]  Chenhao Tan,et al.  Selecting Directors Using Machine Learning , 2018 .

[8]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning , 2016, SIAM Rev..

[9]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features , 1998, ECML.