IN THE WILLOW TIT, PARUS MONTANUS; THE PRINCIPLE OF 'BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY'

Summary The primary alarm call in the willow tit consists of a series of high-pitched, short zi (zee)notes. A large variety of birds flying overhead may evoke alarm calls in the willow tit, many of which are quite harmless to the species. Also many types of 'disturbances' in the forest may elicit alarm calls, including sudden appearance of humans. Alarm calling seems to be an altruistic event since the caller puts itself into a dangerous situation by attracting the predator's attention, while leaving time for associates to take relevant precautions. For an evolutionary selection of alarm calling the cost involved must somehow be outweighed by factor(s) beneficial to the caller. Among several hypotheses trying to explain possible functions of alarm calls, warning of kin and mates seems most likely with regard to tits. The relevance of the 'food resource usurpation-hypothesis' needs further study under natural conditions. The high proportion of 'false' alarms is remarkable. A strategy of 'better safe than sorry' seems to be advantageous, because the time left for appropriate precautions in case of a real attack is so marginal that it pays in the long run to react to any possible threat even if it turns out to be harmless.

[1]  C. Munn.  Birds that ‘cry wolf’ , 1986, Nature.

[2]  K. Lagory.  The influence of habitat and group characteristics on the alarm and flight response of white-tailed deer , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  P. Marler,et al.  Avian alarm calling: Is there an audience effect? , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  P. Marler,et al.  Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens, Gallus gallus, to computer-generated simulations of aerial predators , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  John R. Krebs,et al.  The Evolution of Alarm Calls: Altruism or Manipulation? , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[6]  B. Campbell,et al.  A Dictionary of birds , 1985 .

[7]  J. Ekman.  Coherence, Composition and Territories of Winter Social Groups of the Willow Tit Parus montanus and the Crested Tit P. cristatus , 1979 .

[8]  O. Hogstad.  Social rank in winter flocks of Willow Tits Parus montanus , 1987 .

[9]  P. Sherman.  Alarm calls of Belding's ground squirrels to aerial predators: nepotism or self-preservation? , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  Marcel Gyger,et al.  Audience effects on alarm calling , 1990 .

[11]  P. Helle,et al.  Alarm calling by individual willow tits, Parus montanus , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  P. Marler,et al.  Characteristics of Some Animal Calls , 1955, Nature.

[13]  M. Ficken,et al.  Chickadee alarm calls: Does mate investment pay dividends? , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Pseudo Warning Call in Titmice , 1980 .

[15]  W. Cresswell.  The function of alarm calls in redshanks, Tringa totanus , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[17]  D. Reby,et al.  Contexts and possible functions of barking in roe deer , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  M. Ficken.  Acoustic characteristics of alarm calls associated with predation risk in chickadees , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Peter Marler,et al.  On the meaning of alarm calls: functional reference in an avian vocal system , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  R. H. Yahner.  Barking in a Primitive Ungulate, Muntiacus reevesi: Function and Adaptiveness , 1980, The American Naturalist.