Sales Configurator Information Systems Design Theory

We look for means to advance the field of configuration systems via research that is performed rigorously and methodologically with the aim of theory creation. Specifically, we explore the use of Information Systems Design Theory (ISDT) as a framework for defining a design science theory for sales configurator construction. ISDT is the primary output of Design Science research that “shows the principles inherent in the design of an IS artifact that accomplishes some end, based on knowledge of both IT and human behavior”. The components of ISDT include purpose and scope, constructs, principles of form and function, artifact mutability, testable propositions, and justificatory knowledge. Generalizing from the novel principles of our earlier work applied in the construction of a sales configuration system called WeCoTin, we present the Sales Configurator Information Systems Design Theory SCISDT. SCISDT aims to support development of generic configurators (aka configuration toolkits) that enable the creation of configurator instantiations for individual companies or product lines to provide choice navigation capability.

[1]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  Empirical Testing of a Weight Constraint Rule Based Configurator , 2002 .

[2]  Juha Tiihonen,et al.  Mass customization with configurable products and Configurators: A review of benefits and challenges , 2007 .

[3]  Daniel Sabin,et al.  Product Configuration Frameworks - A Survey , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[4]  Ulrich Junker,et al.  The Logic of ILOG ( J ) Configurator : Combining Constraint Programming with a Description Logic , 2003 .

[5]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  Solving Object-oriented Configuration Scenarios with ASP , 2013, Configuration Workshop.

[6]  Markus Stumptner,et al.  An Overview of Knowledge-Based Configuration , 1997, AI Commun..

[7]  Ulrich Junker,et al.  Preference programming: Advanced problem solving for configuration , 2003, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[8]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Principles for efficient and effective sales configuration design , 2007 .

[9]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Franz Baader.  Description Logics , 2009, Reasoning Web.

[11]  Albert Haag,et al.  Sales Configuration in Business Processes , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[12]  Sanjay Mittal,et al.  Towards a Generic Model of Configuraton Tasks , 1989, IJCAI.

[13]  John P. McDermott,et al.  R1: A Rule-Based Configurer of Computer Systems , 1982, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Benno Stein,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Configuration , 1992, IEA/AIE.

[15]  A. Haselbock,et al.  COCOS/spl minus/a tool for constraint-based, dynamic configuration , 1994, Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications.

[16]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[17]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Standardized Configuration Knowledge Representations as Technological Foundation for Mass Customization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  Robert M. Colomb,et al.  Mechanising Shared Configuration and Diagnosis Theories Through Constraint Logic Programming , 1998, J. Log. Program..

[19]  Markus Stumptner,et al.  Configuring Large Systems Using Generative Constraint Satisfaction , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[20]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Product configuration and inter-firm co-ordination: an innovative solution from a small manufacturing enterprise , 2002, Comput. Ind..

[21]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  Configuration Knowledge Representation Using UML/OCL , 2002, UML.

[22]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  Representing Configuration Knowledge With Weight Constraint Rules , 2001, Answer Set Programming.

[23]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  Uml as Domain Specific Language for the Construction of Knowledge-Based Configuration Systems , 1999, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[24]  Andreas Giinter.  KONWERK-A Domain Independent Configuration Tool , 2003 .

[25]  C. Forza,et al.  Managing for variety in the order acquisition and fulfilment process: The contribution of product configuration systems , 2002 .

[26]  David B. Searls,et al.  Logic-Based Configuration with a Semantic Network , 1990, J. Log. Program..

[27]  Timo Soininen,et al.  Extending and implementing the stable model semantics , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[28]  丁连芬.  术语“configuration——定型”解读 , 2002 .

[29]  Krzysztof Czarnecki,et al.  Unifying Software and Product Configuration: A Research Roadmap (to appear) , 2012 .

[30]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[31]  Mathieu Acher,et al.  The Anatomy of a Sales Configurator: An Empirical Study of 111 Cases , 2013, CAiSE.

[32]  Markus Stumptner,et al.  Configuration knowledge representations for Semantic Web applications , 2003, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[33]  Cipriano Forza,et al.  Sales configurator capabilities to avoid the product variety paradox: Construct development and validation , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[34]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  Configuration-Design Problem Solving , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[35]  Jon R. Wright,et al.  An Industrial-Strength Description-Logics-Based Configurator Platform , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[36]  Markus Stumptner,et al.  An overview of knowledgedbased configuration , 1997 .

[37]  F. Piller,et al.  Cracking the Code of Mass Customization , 2009 .

[38]  M. Heinrich,et al.  A resource-based paradigm for the configuring of technical systems from modular components , 1991, [1991] Proceedings. The Seventh IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Application.

[39]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  A Practical Tool for Mass-Customising Configurable Products , 2003 .

[40]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  Towards a general ontology of configuration , 1998, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[41]  D. Bernhardt,et al.  Product Customization , 2006 .

[42]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The unified modeling language reference manual , 2010 .

[43]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Product Information Management for Mass Customization: Connecting Customer, Front-office and Back-office for Fast and Efficient Customization , 2006 .

[44]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  Information and Management Systems for Product Customization , 2014 .

[45]  Markus Stumptner,et al.  Configuration Knowledge Representation and Reasoning , 2014 .

[46]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Chapter 15 – Configuration-Related Research Challenges , 2014 .

[47]  Daniel Mailharro,et al.  A classification and constraint-based framework for configuration , 1998, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[48]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Knowledge-Based Configuration: From Research to Business Cases , 2014 .

[49]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1990, AAAI.

[50]  Andreas Günter,et al.  PLAKON—an approach to domain-independent construction , 1989, IEA/AIE '89.

[51]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Personalized Product Configuration , 2010, MKWI.

[52]  Juha Tiihonen,et al.  WeCoTin - A practical logic-based sales configurator , 2013, AI Commun..

[53]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  Generating product configuration knowledge bases from precise domain extended UML models , 2000, ICSE 2000.

[54]  Jon R. Wright,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Configurator that Supports Sales, Engineering, and Manufacturing at AT&T Network Systems , 1993, AI Mag..

[55]  Anneke Kleppe,et al.  The Object Constraint Language: Getting Your Models Ready for MDA , 2003 .