Implications of the "contrast blush" finding on computed tomographic scan of the spleen in trauma.

BACKGROUND The "contrast blush" (CB) computed tomographic (CT) scan finding has often been used clinically as an indicator for therapeutic splenic intervention (SI) (splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, or angiographic embolization). We sought to examine the prognostic significance of this finding. METHODS The records and CT scans of 324 trauma patients from two Level I trauma centers who had blunt splenic injury and a CT scan of the abdomen within 24 hours of admission were reviewed and screened for CB. RESULTS CB was identified in 11% of patients, and its incidence was significantly related to the grade of injury: grade I/II, 3.2%; grade III, 11.8%; and grade IV/V, 26.3% (p < 0.001). SI was also related to the grade: grade I/II, 7.7%; grade III, 37.6%; and grade IV/V, 69.7% (p < 0.001). The chance of having SI was greater in those with CB (75.0%) when compared with those without CB (25.0%) (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 9.2). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SI correlated independently with splenic grade, emergency department hypotension, and age, but did not demonstrate a correlation with CB. CONCLUSION CB is not an absolute indication for an operative or angiographic intervention. Factors such as patient age, grade of injury, and presence of hypotension need to be considered in the clinical management of these patients.

[1]  A. Hagiwara,et al.  Nonsurgical management of patients with blunt hepatic injury: efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  T. Scalea,et al.  Nonoperative salvage of computed tomography-diagnosed splenic injuries: utilization of angiography for triage and embolization for hemostasis. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  J. Amorosa,et al.  Computed tomography is inaccurate in estimating the severity of adult splenic injury. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  T. Fabian,et al.  Management of blunt splenic trauma: computed tomographic contrast blush predicts failure of nonoperative management. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  D. Clark,et al.  Is computed tomographic grading of splenic injury useful in the nonsurgical management of blunt trauma? , 1994, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  C. Becker,et al.  Blunt splenic trauma in adults: can CT findings be used to determine the need for surgery? , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J J Cronan,et al.  Splenic trauma: can CT grading systems enable prediction of successful nonsurgical treatment? , 1991, Radiology.

[8]  H. Champion,et al.  Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  D. Gens,et al.  Blunt splenic trauma in adults: CT-based classification and correlation with prognosis and treatment. , 1989, Radiology.

[10]  M. Fink,et al.  Nonoperative treatment of adult splenic trauma: development of a computed tomographic scoring system that detects appropriate candidates for expectant management. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  T. Scalea,et al.  Superselective embolization of a traumatic intrasplenic arteriovenous fistula. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  A. Peitzman,et al.  Blunt splenic injury in adults: clinical and CT criteria for management, with emphasis on active extravasation. , 1998, Radiology.