Network Effects in the ERP Systems Market : An Analysis of the Implications of Business Intelligence and Cloud Computing

Presently the vendors of ERP software are facing threats as well as opportunities by new technological challenges. In particular, business intelligence and cloud computing are, besides others, important trends in the ERP market. It is crucial for the ERP vendors to gain strong positions in both fields to remain competitive. Since the software market is often influenced by network effect we analyzed four big ERP vendors, namely Microsoft, Oracle, Sage, and SAP with respect to these effects on business intelligence and cloud computing. We enriched our analysis by IBM which is not an ERP vendor but is a leading IT company in both fields: business intelligence as well as cloud computing. The four ERP vendors have notably different histories. While SAP started as an ERP vendor, Oracl began as a vendor of data base systems. Microsoft’s most important products are still the operating system Windows and its office suite. Sage, like SAP, is an ERP vendor but primarily addresses SME while SAP’s main strength is still in the field of EPR systems for large co-operations.

[1]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[2]  P. Mell,et al.  The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[3]  Jennifer Todd,et al.  IISSSSCC DD IISSCCUUSSSSIIOONN PP AAPPEERR SS EERRIIEESS T HE R OOTS OF I NTENSE E THNIC C ONFLICT MAY NOT IN FACT BE E THNIC :C ATEGORIES , C OMMUNITIES AND P ATH D EPENDENCE Joseph , 2017 .

[4]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Scale Economies in New Software Development , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[5]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[6]  C. Kemerer,et al.  Network Externalities in Microcomputer Software: An Econometric Analysis of the Spreadsheet Market , 2014 .

[7]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[8]  Giancarlo Succi,et al.  Network externalities in software systems , 1998, STAN.

[9]  S. Liebowitz,et al.  Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History , 1995 .

[10]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[11]  Abhinav Mishra,et al.  Cloud computing security considerations , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC).

[12]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[13]  J. Chanaron,et al.  Technology, Strategy and Management , 1992 .

[14]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[15]  K. H. Masiyev,et al.  Cloud computing for business , 2012, 2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT).

[16]  Drasko Tomic,et al.  Economics of the cloud computing , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of the 34th International Convention MIPRO.

[17]  H. Leibenstein Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand , 1950 .

[18]  Richard Weber,et al.  Network Externalities for Enterprise Resource Planning Software - A Research Roadmap , 2016, ICEIS.

[19]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Cloud computing and SaaS as new computing platforms , 2010, CACM.

[20]  Matthew Woll,et al.  Standardization , 1928 .

[21]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .