Connecting, Trusting, and Participating: The Direct and Interactive Effects of Social Associations

In recent years, research has come to recognize that nonpolitical associations have unintended but important consequences for citizens’ participation in public affairs. Scholars theorize that these associational activities—embedded within social networks and sustained by confidence in the motives of others—encourage and facilitate participation in civic life. This study tests and broadens these theses by (1) assessing the relative impact of different types of associational activities (i.e., informal socializing, public attendance, and religious participation) and (2) examining interactive relationships between these activities and generalized interpersonal trust. Findings show that all of these associational activities significantly contribute to civic engagement. Furthermore, all three interactions between the social associations and social trust are significant, indicating that those involved in associational activities are even more likely to become civic participants when they hold trusting attitudes toward others.

[1]  Robert Schmid,et al.  Fundamental concepts of sociology , 1940 .

[2]  B. Wright,et al.  Democracy In America , 2011 .

[3]  N. Babchuk,et al.  Personal Influence Networks and Voluntary Association Affiliation , 1969 .

[4]  M. Olsen.  SOCIAL PARTICIPATION AND VOTING TURNOUT: A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS * , 1972 .

[5]  G. Bultena,et al.  Voluntary Association Membership and Political Participation: an Exploration of the Mobilization Hypothesis* , 1975 .

[6]  A. Shupe.  Social Participation and Voting Turnout , 1979 .

[7]  A. Wandersman,et al.  Community and individual difference characteristics as influences on initial participation , 1980 .

[8]  P. Pollock.  Organizations as Agents of Mobilization: How Does Group Activity Affect Political Participation? , 1982 .

[9]  N. Milburn.  To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1983 .

[10]  A. Wandersman,et al.  The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive, and affective components of neighboring , 1985 .

[11]  W. Davidson,et al.  Sense of community and political participation , 1989 .

[12]  D. Chavis,et al.  Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development , 1990 .

[13]  N. Day,et al.  Political participation and democracy in Britain , 1992 .

[14]  Steven A. Peterson,et al.  Church Participation and Political Participation , 1992 .

[15]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[16]  R. Putnam.  The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[17]  R. Putnam.  Making Democracy Work , 1993 .

[18]  A. Radley,et al.  Charitable Giving by Individuals: A Study of Attitudes and Practice , 1995 .

[19]  R. Putnam.  Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[20]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[21]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[22]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign , 1995 .

[23]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[24]  Personal and community sustainability , 1996 .

[25]  W. Galston.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[26]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. , 1996 .

[27]  K. Newton.  Social Capital and Democracy , 1997 .

[28]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Incentives and Social Capital: Are Homeowners Better Citizens? , 1998 .

[29]  A. Greeley,et al.  Coleman Revisited , 1997 .

[30]  W. Rahn,et al.  Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital , 1997 .

[31]  Dietlind Stolle,et al.  Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations , 1998 .

[32]  Dietlind Stolle,et al.  Why Do Bowling and Singing Matter? Group Characteristics, Membership, and Generalized Trust , 1998 .

[33]  V. Ryan,et al.  The influence of local church participation on rural community attachment , 1998 .

[34]  Eric M. Uslaner,et al.  Social Capital, Television, and the "Mean World": Trust, Optimism, and Civic Participation* , 1998 .

[35]  John Wilson,et al.  The Contribution of Social Resources To Volunteering. , 1998 .

[36]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation , 1998 .

[37]  Dhavan V. Shah.  Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust, and Television Use: An Individual-Level Assessment of Social Capital , 1998 .

[38]  C. Ellison,et al.  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CURRENT CONTROVERSIES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION , 1999 .

[39]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[40]  C. A. Cassel.  Voluntary associations, churches, and social participation theories of turnout , 1999 .

[41]  Corwin E. Smidt.  Religion and Civic Engagement: A Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[42]  Pippa Norris,et al.  Confidence in political institutions: faith, culture, or performance? , 2000 .

[43]  B R Hasselkus,et al.  Habits of the heart. , 2000, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[44]  Edward,et al.  Measuring Trust , 2000 .

[45]  Pippa Norris,et al.  THREE. Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Performance? , 2000 .

[46]  K. Newton.  Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy , 2001 .

[47]  NAEWON KANG,et al.  A Multilevel Approach to Civic Participation , 2003, Commun. Res..

[48]  Lee Trepanier,et al.  Trust in Society , 2004 .