Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland.
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Renshaw | D. Grignon | P. Humphrey | J. Srigley | L. Egevad | V. Reuter | Sam S. Chang | J. Epstein | M. Amin | R. Montironi | J. McKiernan | T. Wheeler | Peter A. Humphrey
[1] Harlan I. Firminger,et al. Atlas of tumor pathology , 1954 .
[2] D. Gleason,et al. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. , 1974, The Journal of urology.
[3] H. Cockrill,et al. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1987, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society.
[4] P. Scardino,et al. The Mechanisms and Prognostic Significance of Seminal Vesicle Involvement by Prostate Cancer , 1993, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[5] A S Whittemore,et al. Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer , 1993, Cancer.
[6] M. Toublanc,et al. Systematic biopsies accurately predict extracapsular extension of prostate cancer and persistent/recurrent detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy. , 1994, Urology.
[7] M. Kattan,et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1995, The Journal of urology.
[8] D. Bostwick,et al. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis. , 1995, The Journal of urology.
[9] H. Schmid,et al. Is the percentage of cancer in biopsy cores predictive of extracapsular disease in T1‐T2 prostate carcinoma? , 1996 .
[10] H. Schmid,et al. Is the percentage of cancer in biopsy cores predictive of extracapsular disease in T1-T2 prostate carcinoma? , 1996, Cancer.
[11] A. Partin,et al. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. , 1996, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[12] J. Epstein,et al. Do close but negative margins in radical prostatectomy specimens increase the risk of postoperative progression? , 1997, The Journal of urology.
[13] R T Vollmer,et al. Percentage carcinoma as a measure of prostatic tumor size in radical prostatectomy tissues. , 1997, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.
[14] M. Kattan,et al. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. , 1998, Human pathology.
[15] A. Haese*,et al. Incidence of positive surgical margins after biopsy-selected nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. , 1998, Urology.
[16] A. Renshaw,et al. Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy specimens. Correlation with extraprostatic extension at resection. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.
[17] A. Renshaw,et al. Maximum diameter of prostatic carcinoma is a simple, inexpensive, and independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen failure in radical prostatectomy specimens. Validation in a cohort of 434 patients. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.
[18] O. Yossepowitch,et al. Bladder neck involvement at radical prostatectomy: positive margins or advanced T4 disease? , 2000, Urology.
[19] C. Pan,et al. Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 2001, Human pathology.
[20] A. Partin,et al. Influence of biopsy perineural invasion on long-term biochemical disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Urology.
[21] C. Compton,et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.
[22] M. Rubin,et al. Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck: recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modification. American Joint Committee on Cancer. , 2002, Urology.
[23] S. Freedland,et al. Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score. , 2002, The Journal of urology.
[24] P. Humphrey. Tumors of the Prostate Gland, Seminal Vesicles, Male Urethra, and Penis , 2003 .
[25] P. Humphrey,et al. Multiple Measures of Carcinoma Extent Versus Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy Tissue in Prediction of Pathologic Stage in a Screening Population , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[26] M. Kattan,et al. Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate , 2004, Modern Pathology.
[27] T. Tsuzuki,et al. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression. , 2004, Urology.
[28] V. Freeman,et al. Gleason grading of prostate cancer: level of concordance between pathologists at the University Hospital of the West Indies. , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.
[29] M. Terris,et al. Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[30] R Montironi,et al. Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Contemporary approach. , 2005, Pathologica.
[31] Sten Nilsson,et al. Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens , 2005, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.
[32] P. Humphrey,et al. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy as risk factor for detection of adenocarcinoma: current level of risk in screening population. , 2005, Urology.
[33] Michael W Kattan,et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[34] L. Egevad,et al. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[35] P. Humphrey,et al. Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens , 2005, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.
[36] J. Epstein,et al. Widespread High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on Prostatic Needle Biopsy: A Significant Likelihood of Subsequently Diagnosed Adenocarcinoma , 2006, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[37] J. Srigley. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[38] J. Epstein,et al. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: histologic features and clinical significance , 2006, Modern Pathology.
[39] J. Epstein,et al. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. , 2006, The Journal of urology.
[40] Scott H. Kurtzman,et al. AJCC cancer staging atlas , 2006 .
[41] M. Kattan,et al. Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[42] M. Rubin,et al. A proposal on the identification, histologic reporting, and implications of intraductal prostatic carcinoma. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[43] D. Song,et al. Perineural invasion affects biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy. , 2007, Urology.
[44] A. Renshaw,et al. PSA failure following definitive treatment of prostate cancer having biopsy Gleason score 7 with tertiary grade 5. , 2007, JAMA.
[45] Alan W Partin,et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. , 2007, Urology.
[46] J. Srigley,et al. Multifocal high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a significant risk factor for prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 2009, The Journal of urology.
[47] H. Levin,et al. Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor , 2009, Modern Pathology.
[49] A. Partin,et al. The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted. , 2010, The Journal of urology.
[50] A. Partin,et al. Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prognosis. , 2010, Urology.
[51] J. Srigley,et al. Is high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia still a risk factor for adenocarcinoma in the era of extended biopsy sampling? , 2010, Pathology.
[52] Rodolfo Montironi,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[53] B. Trock,et al. Should Intervening Benign Tissue Be Included in the Measurement of Discontinuous Foci of Cancer on Prostate Needle Biopsy? Correlation With Radical Prostatectomy Findings , 2011, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[54] B. Delahunt,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes , 2011, Modern Pathology.
[55] Liang Cheng,et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins , 2011, Modern Pathology.