Established and Novel Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmission Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Modified Delphi and Focus Group Study to Identify Clinically Important Predictors

Thirty-day readmission following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an important outcome influencing the quality of patient care and health system efficiency. The aims of this study were (1) to ascertain the clinical importance of established risk factors for 30-day readmission risk and give clinicians the opportunity to suggest and discuss novel risk factors and (2) to evaluate consensus on the importance of these risk factors. This study was conducted in two stages: a modified Delphi survey followed by a focus group. Orthopaedic surgeons and anaesthetists involved in the care of TKA patients completed an anonymous survey to judge the clinical importance of risk factors selected from a systematic review and meta-analysis and to suggest other clinically meaningful risk factors, which were then discussed in a focus group designed using elements of nominal group technique. Eleven risk factors received a majority (≥50%) vote of high importance in the Delphi survey overall, and six risk factors received a majority vote of high importance in the focus group overall. Lack of consensus highlighted the fact that this is a highly complex problem which is challenging to predict and which depends heavily on risk factors which may be open to interpretation, difficult to capture, and dependent upon personal clinical experience, which must be tailored to the individual patient.

[1]  G. Cacciola,et al.  No Significant Differences in Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes between PCL Retained or Sacrificed Kinematic Aligned Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty in Varus Knee , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  G. Cacciola,et al.  Learning Curve in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2022, Applied Sciences.

[3]  Raju Vaishya,et al.  Restricted kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of radiographic and clinical data. , 2022, Journal of orthopaedics.

[4]  P. Choong,et al.  Developing and internally validating a prediction model for total knee replacement surgery in patients with osteoarthritis , 2022, Osteoarthritis and cartilage open.

[5]  R. Fujimori,et al.  Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence–Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation , 2022, JMIR formative research.

[6]  E. Rodríguez‐Merchán,et al.  Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal conditions. , 2021, Frontiers in bioscience.

[7]  Joseph S Munn,et al.  Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Models Cannot Discriminate Between Satisfied and Dissatisfied Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients. , 2021, Journal of Arthroplasty.

[8]  Alessandro Bistolfi,et al.  Kinetic Sensors for Ligament Balance and Kinematic Evaluation in Anatomic Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2021, Sensors.

[9]  W. Maloney,et al.  Asia-Pacific venous thromboembolism consensus in knee and hip arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery: Part 1. Diagnosis and risk factors , 2021, Knee Surgery & Related Research.

[10]  D. Elston Participation Bias, Self-selection Bias and Response Bias. , 2021, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[11]  L. Ai,et al.  Factors predicting successful vaginal birth after caesarean section: protocol for evidence-based consensus recommendations using a Delphi survey , 2021, BMJ Open.

[12]  P. Choong,et al.  Patient-Related Risk Factors for Unplanned 30-Day Hospital Readmission Following Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[13]  P. Choong,et al.  Cohort profile: the St Vincent’s Melbourne Arthroplasty Outcomes (SMART) Registry, a pragmatic prospective database defining outcomes in total hip and knee replacement patients , 2021, BMJ Open.

[14]  P. Choong,et al.  Developing prediction models for total knee replacement surgery in patients with osteoarthritis: Statistical analysis plan , 2020, Osteoarthritis and cartilage open.

[15]  Amey S. Mahajan,et al.  Risk Factors for Readmission After Knee Arthroplasty Based on Predictive Models: A Systematic Review , 2020, Arthroplasty today.

[16]  E. Reinertsen,et al.  Physiology as a Lingua Franca for Clinical Machine Learning , 2020, Patterns.

[17]  O. Ljungqvist,et al.  Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations , 2019, Acta orthopaedica.

[18]  Douglas S. Wetmore,et al.  Anaesthetic care of patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: consensus recommendations from the International Consensus on Anaesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery group (ICAROS) based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  S. Lavender,et al.  The Development of a Comprehensive List of Risk Factors for Hip Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Delphi Survey , 2019, AHFE.

[20]  E. Blozik,et al.  Hospital readmission risk prediction based on claims data available at admission: a pilot study in Switzerland , 2019, BMJ Open.

[21]  D. Morgan,et al.  Assessment of Machine Learning vs Standard Prediction Rules for Predicting Hospital Readmissions , 2019, JAMA network open.

[22]  N. Kissoon,et al.  Determining predictors of sepsis at triage among children under 5 years of age in resource-limited settings: A modified Delphi process , 2019, PloS one.

[23]  Ankur Teredesai,et al.  Interpretable Machine Learning in Healthcare , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI).

[24]  A. Karch,et al.  Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data – which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[25]  S. Dhaliwal,et al.  Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review , 2016, BMJ Open.

[26]  Joshua D. Harris,et al.  Causes and Rates of Unplanned Readmissions After Elective Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2015, American journal of orthopedics.

[27]  Joseph Futoma,et al.  A comparison of models for predicting early hospital readmissions , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[28]  T. Colbourn,et al.  Predictors of treatment failure for non-severe childhood pneumonia in developing countries – systematic literature review and expert survey – the first step towards a community focused mHealth risk-assessment tool? , 2015, BMC Pediatrics.

[29]  Harriet E. Wintermute Doodle; http://doodle.com/ , 2015 .

[30]  K. Hersberger,et al.  Determination of risk factors for drug-related problems: a multidisciplinary triangulation process , 2015, BMJ Open.

[31]  Jeanette W. Chung,et al.  Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. , 2015, JAMA.

[32]  A. DiCenso,et al.  The use of triangulation in qualitative research. , 2014, Oncology nursing forum.

[33]  Amanda J. Wheeler,et al.  Using the Nominal Group Technique: how to analyse across multiple groups , 2014, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[34]  Thomas P Vail,et al.  What Are the Rates and Causes of Hospital Readmission After Total Knee Arthroplasty? , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  J. Stinson,et al.  Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[36]  Martha Sajatovic,et al.  Clinical Prediction Models , 2013 .

[37]  M. McHugh Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[38]  M. Westerman,et al.  A local consensus process making use of focus groups to enhance the implementation of a national integrated health care standard on obesity care. , 2012, Family practice.

[39]  Jon Barrutia,et al.  Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts , 2011 .

[40]  Phil Hider,et al.  The validity of readmission rate as a marker of the quality of hospital care, and a recommendation for its definition. , 2009, The New Zealand medical journal.

[41]  Rubén Nieto,et al.  Predictive factors of chronic pain and disability in whiplash: A Delphi poll , 2008, European journal of pain.

[42]  F. Saad,et al.  Clinicians are poor raters of life‐expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer , 2007, BJU international.

[43]  Rubén Nieto,et al.  Predictive factors of chronic pediatric pain and disability: a Delphi poll. , 2007, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[44]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[45]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[46]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[47]  M. Patton,et al.  Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. , 1999, Health services research.

[48]  J. Trueman Poll Everywhere , 2018, 50 Ways to Use Technology Enhanced Learning in the Classroom: Practical strategies for teaching.

[49]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[50]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Predictors for persistent neuropathic pain--a Delphi survey. , 2011, Pain physician.

[51]  Tünde Varga-Atkins,et al.  The Nominal Group Technique - a practical guide for facilitators , 2011 .

[52]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Computing Krippendorff's Alpha-Reliability , 2011 .

[53]  George M. Zinkhan,et al.  Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research , 2006 .

[54]  S. Gordon,et al.  The Nominal Group Technique: A useful concensus methodology in physiotherapy research , 2004 .