Improved quantification in single-pinhole and multiple-pinhole SPECT using micro-CT information

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of accurate quantification in pinhole SPECT using micro-CT information.MethodsPinhole SPECT scans were performed using a clinical dual-head gamma camera. Each pinhole SPECT scan was followed by a micro-CT acquisition. Functional and anatomical images were coregistered using six point sources visible with both modalities. Pinhole SPECT images were reconstructed iteratively. Attenuation correction was based on micro-CT information. Scatter correction was based on dual and triple-energy window methods. Phantom and animal experiments were performed. A phantom containing nine vials was filled with different concentrations of 99mTc. Three vials were also filled with CT contrast agent to increase attenuation. Activity concentrations measured on the pinhole SPECT images were compared with activity concentrations measured by the dose calibrator. In addition, 11 mice were injected with 99mTc-labelled Nanobodies. After acquiring functional and anatomical images, the animals were killed and the liver activity was measured using a gamma-counter. Activity concentrations measured on the reconstructed images were compared with activity concentrations measured with the gamma counter.ResultsThe phantom experiments demonstrated an average error of −27.3 ± 15.9% between the activity concentrations measured on the uncorrected pinhole SPECT images and in the dose calibrator. This error decreased significantly to −0.1 ± 7.3% when corrections were applied for nonuniform attenuation and scatter. The animal experiment revealed an average error of −18.4 ± 11.9% between the activity concentrations measured on the uncorrected pinhole SPECT images and measured with the gamma counter. This error decreased to −7.9 ± 10.4% when attenuation and scatter correction was applied.ConclusionAttenuation correction obtained from micro-CT data in combination with scatter correction allows accurate quantification in pinhole SPECT.

[1]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Quantitative small field-of-view pinhole SPECT imaging: initial evaluation , 1995 .

[2]  Patrick L Chow,et al.  A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Interest of the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OS-EM) algorithm in pinhole single-photon emission tomography reconstruction: a phantom study , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Absolute quantification of regional cerebral glucose utilization in mice by 18F-FDG small animal PET scanning and 2-14C-DG autoradiography. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Clive Baldock,et al.  Investigation of the relationship between linear attenuation coefficients and CT Hounsfield units using radionuclides for SPECT. , 2008, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[6]  Christian Vanhove,et al.  Comparison of the Biodistribution and Tumor Targeting of Two 99mTc-Labeled Anti-EGFR Nanobodies in Mice, Using Pinhole SPECT/Micro-CT , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Troy Farncombe,et al.  An overview of attenuation and scatter correction of planar and SPECT data for dosimetry studies. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[8]  K. Ogawa,et al.  A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scatter correction in single photon emission CT. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[9]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Perturbative Refinement of the Geometric Calibration in Pinhole SPECT , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Sanjiv S. Gambhir,et al.  AMIDE: A Free Software Tool for Multimodality Medical Image Analysis , 2003 .

[11]  Karen J. Olsen,et al.  X-Ray Form Factor, Attenuation and Scattering Tables (version 2.0) , 2003 .

[12]  N. Pelc,et al.  An attenuated projector-backprojector for iterative SPECT reconstruction. , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  E. Ficaro,et al.  Clinical review of attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[14]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Characterization of pinhole SPECT acquisition geometry , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  P. V. van Rijk,et al.  U-SPECT-I: a novel system for submillimeter-resolution tomography with radiolabeled molecules in mice. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Martine M. Mirrione,et al.  Optimizing experimental protocols for quantitative behavioral imaging with 18F-FDG in rodents. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Koichi Ogawa,et al.  Quantitative image reconstruction using position-dependent scatter correction in single photon emission CT , 1992, IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging.

[18]  B. Hasegawa,et al.  Attenuation correction for small animal SPECT imaging using x-ray CT data. , 2005, Medical physics.

[19]  Matt A. King,et al.  A dual-photopeak window method for scatter correction. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  S. Meikle,et al.  Small animal SPECT and its place in the matrix of molecular imaging technologies , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  M. Defrise,et al.  Three-pinhole collimator to improve axial spatial resolution and sensitivity in pinhole SPECT , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  F J Beekman,et al.  Movies of dopamine transporter occupancy with ultra-high resolution focusing pinhole SPECT , 2007, Molecular Psychiatry.

[24]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Optimization of geometrical calibration in pinhole SPECT , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  B. Hasegawa,et al.  Assessment of the sources of error affecting the quantitative accuracy of SPECT imaging in small animals , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  G J Hademenos,et al.  Comparison of four scatter correction methods using Monte Carlo simulated source distributions. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  I Buvat,et al.  Comparative assessment of nine scatter correction methods based on spectral analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  C. Vanhove,et al.  SPECT Imaging with 99mTc-Labeled EGFR-Specific Nanobody for In Vivo Monitoring of EGFR Expression , 2008, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[29]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Multi-modality imaging on track , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[30]  J. Case,et al.  Attenuation artifact, attenuation correction, and the future of myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[31]  D. Gilland,et al.  Evaluation of SPECT quantification of radiopharmaceutical distribution in canine myocardium. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Masaaki Tanaka,et al.  Assessment of microPET performance in analyzing the rat brain under different types of anesthesia: comparison between quantitative data obtained with microPET and ex vivo autoradiography , 2003, NeuroImage.

[33]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[34]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Reproducibility of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements in rat using pinhole gated SPECT , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.