Benchmark Comparison of Commercially Available Systems for Particle Number Measurement

[1]  Chris Barnes,et al.  DETR/SMMT/CONCAWE Particle Research Programme: Sampling and Measurement Experiences , 2000 .

[2]  M. W. Reeks,et al.  Kinetic models for particle resuspension in turbulent flows: theory and measurement , 2001 .

[3]  Barouch Giechaskiel,et al.  Comparison of Particle Number Measurements from the Full Dilution Tunnel, the Tailpipe and Two Partial Flow Systems , 2010 .

[4]  Bruce Campbell,et al.  Study of Particle Number Emissions from a Turbocharged Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Engine Including Data from a Fast-Response Particle Size Spectrometer , 2011 .

[5]  Tony Collier,et al.  Dynamic Particulate Measurements from a DISI Vehicle: A Comparison of DMS500, ELPI, CPC and PASS , 2006 .

[6]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  REVIEW OF DIESEL PARTICULATE MATTER SAMPLING METHODS , 1999 .

[7]  Alexander Bergmann,et al.  Calibration and accuracy of a particle number measurement system , 2010 .

[8]  B. Giechaskiel,et al.  Overview of Soot Emission Measurements Instrumentation: From Smoke and Filter Mass to Particle Number , 2013 .

[9]  Barouch Giechaskiel,et al.  Calibration and Validation of Various Commercial Particle Number Measurement Systems , 2009 .

[10]  L. Isella,et al.  Diesel-exhaust aerosol dynamics from the tailpipe to the dilution tunnel , 2008 .

[11]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Real Time Measurements of Diesel Particle Size Distribution with an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor , 1998 .

[12]  G. Martini,et al.  Future European emission standards for vehicles: the importance of the UN-ECE Particle Measurement Programme , 2009, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.