Comprehensive analysis of protein digestion using six trypsins reveals the origin of trypsin as a significant source of variability in proteomics.

Trypsin is an endoprotease commonly used for sample preparation in proteomics experiments. Importantly, protein digestion is dependent on multiple factors, including the trypsin origin and digestion conditions. In-depth characterization of trypsin activity could lead to improved reliability of peptide detection and quantitation in both targeted and discovery proteomics studies. To this end, we assembled a data analysis pipeline and suite of visualization tools for quality control and comprehensive characterization of preanalytical variability in proteomics experiments. Using these tools, we evaluated six available proteomics-grade trypsins and their digestion of a single purified protein, human serum albumin (HSA). HSA was aliquoted and then digested for 2 or 18 h for each trypsin, and the resulting digests were desalted and analyzed in triplicate by reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Peptides were identified and quantified using the NIST MSQC pipeline and a comprehensive HSA mass spectral library. We performed a statistical analysis of peptide abundances from different digests and further visualized the data using the principal component analysis and quantitative protein "sequence maps". While the performance of individual trypsins across repeat digests was reproducible, significant differences were observed depending on the origin of the trypsin (i.e., bovine vs porcine). Bovine trypsins produced a higher number of peptides containing missed cleavages, whereas porcine trypsins produced more semitryptic peptides. In addition, many cleavage sites showed variable digestion kinetics patterns, evident from the comparison of peptide abundances in 2 h vs 18 h digests. Overall, this work illustrates effects of an often neglected source of variability in proteomics experiments: the origin of the trypsin.

[1]  B. Keil Proteolysis Data Bank: specificity of alpha-chymotrypsin from computation of protein cleavages. , 1987, Protein sequences & data analysis.

[2]  K S Wilson,et al.  Evolutionary divergence and conservation of trypsin. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[3]  L. Hedstrom Serine protease mechanism and specificity. , 2002, Chemical reviews.

[4]  M. Mann,et al.  Trypsin Cleaves Exclusively C-terminal to Arginine and Lysine Residues*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[5]  Aaron A. Klammer,et al.  Effects of modified digestion schemes on the identification of proteins from complex mixtures. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[6]  G. Hurst,et al.  Comparison of digestion protocols for microgram quantities of enriched protein samples. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Does trypsin cut before proline? , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[8]  Liang-Yu Shih,et al.  An improved trypsin digestion method minimizes digestion-induced modifications on proteins. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[9]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Birgit Schilling,et al.  Interlaboratory Study Characterizing a Yeast Performance Standard for Benchmarking LC-MS Platform Performance* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  Darryl B. Hardie,et al.  A quantitative study of the effects of chaotropic agents, surfactants, and solvents on the digestion efficiency of human plasma proteins by trypsin. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  Birgit Schilling,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[13]  J. Coon,et al.  Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[14]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Generating and navigating proteome maps using mass spectrometry , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  Patrick G. A. Pedrioli Trans-Proteomic Pipeline: A Pipeline for Proteomic Analysis , 2010, Proteome Bioinformatics.

[16]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Nanobiocatalysis for protein digestion in proteomic analysis , 2010, Proteomics.

[17]  A. Ivanov,et al.  Proteomics under pressure: development of essential sample preparation techniques in proteomics using ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[18]  Xingdong Feng,et al.  Variance Component Analysis of a Multi-Site Study for the Reproducibility of Multiple Reaction Monitoring Measurements of Peptides in Human Plasma , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  D R Mani,et al.  Interlaboratory Evaluation of Automated, Multiplexed Peptide Immunoaffinity Enrichment Coupled to Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Quantifying Proteins in Plasma* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[20]  L. Reubsaet,et al.  Critical assessment of accelerating trypsination methods. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[21]  M. Mann,et al.  Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. , 2011, Annual review of biochemistry.

[22]  Nathalie Selevsek,et al.  Toward a standardized urine proteome analysis methodology , 2011, Proteomics.

[23]  M. Reboiro-Jato,et al.  An assessment of the ultrasonic probe‐based enhancement of protein cleavage with immobilized trypsin , 2011, Proteomics.

[24]  Lee Goodwin,et al.  Bioanalytical approaches to analyzing peptides and proteins by LC--MS/MS. , 2011, Bioanalysis.

[25]  C. Radziejewski,et al.  Comparability analysis of protein therapeutics by bottom-up LC-MS with stable isotope-tagged reference standards , 2011, mAbs.

[26]  Addressing trypsin bias in large scale (phospho)proteome analysis by size exclusion chromatography and secondary digestion of large post-trypsin peptides. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  Philip Brownridge,et al.  The importance of the digest: proteolysis and absolute quantification in proteomics. , 2011, Methods.

[28]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[29]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Consecutive proteolytic digestion in an enzyme reactor increases depth of proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  K. Lilley,et al.  Pipeline to assess the greatest source of technical variance in quantitative proteomics using metabolic labelling. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[31]  Albert Sickmann,et al.  Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[32]  Rainer Bischoff,et al.  Internal standards in the quantitative determination of protein biopharmaceuticals using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[33]  Christoph H. Borchers,et al.  The Effect of Pre-Analytical Variability on the Measurement of MRM-MS-Based Mid- to High-Abundance Plasma Protein Biomarkers and a Panel of Cytokines , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Large-scale quantitative assessment of different in-solution protein digestion protocols reveals superior cleavage efficiency of tandem Lys-C/trypsin proteolysis over trypsin digestion. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[35]  Richard D Smith,et al.  Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam Principles). , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[36]  N. Dovichi,et al.  High efficiency and quantitatively reproducible protein digestion by trypsin-immobilized magnetic microspheres. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[37]  T. Olah,et al.  Quantitation of therapeutic proteins following direct trypsin digestion of dried blood spot samples and detection by LC-MS-based bioanalytical methods in drug discovery. , 2012, Bioanalysis.

[38]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[39]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[40]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions , 2012, Nature Methods.

[41]  S. Hubbard,et al.  Prediction of missed proteolytic cleavages for the selection of surrogate peptides for quantitative proteomics. , 2012, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[42]  Matthew E Monroe,et al.  In-source fragmentation and the sources of partially tryptic peptides in shotgun proteomics. , 2013, Journal of Proteome Research.

[43]  Guadalupe Espadas,et al.  Cutting edge proteomics: benchmarking of six commercial trypsins. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.