Conceptual similarity effects on working memory in sentence contexts: Testing a theory of anaphora

The degree of semantic similarity between an anaphoric noun phrase (e.g., the bird) and its antecedent (e.g., a robin) is known to affect the anaphor resolution process, but the mechanisms that underlie this effect are not known. One proposal (Almor, 1999) is that semantic similarity triggers interference effects in working memory and makes two crucial assumptions: First, semantic similarity impairs working memory just as phonological similarity does (e.g., Baddeley, 1992), and, second, this impairment interferes with processes of sentence comprehension. We tested these assumptions in two experiments that compared recall accuracy between phonologically similar, semantically similar, and control words in sentence contexts. Our results do not provide support for Almor's claims: Phonological overlap decreased recall accuracy in sentence contexts, but semantic similarity did not. These results shed doubt on the idea that semantic interference in working memory is an underlying mechanism in anaphor resolution.

[1]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[2]  A D Baddeley,et al.  Short-term Memory for Word Sequences as a Function of Acoustic, Semantic and Formal Similarity , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms. , 2004 .

[4]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements and Anaphor Resolution: Effects of Antecedent Typicality and Distance , 1990, Language and speech.

[5]  MenY C. Porren.  Regeneration i the Short-Term Recall of Sentences , 2006 .

[6]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[7]  Curt Burgess,et al.  From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model , 1998 .

[8]  J. Engelkamp,et al.  Phonological Information Contributes to Short-Term Recall of Auditorily Presented Sentences☆ , 2001 .

[9]  M. Poirier,et al.  Memory for Related and Unrelated Words: Further Evidence on the Influence of Semantic Factors in Immediate Serial Recall , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[11]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Clause Wrap-Up on Eye Movements during Reading , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[14]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data , 1983 .

[15]  Marius Usher,et al.  Maintenance of semantic information in capacity-limited item short-term memory , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Jean Saint-Aubin,et al.  The Influence of Long-term Memory Factors on Immediate Serial Recall: An Item and Order Analysis , 1999 .

[17]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Automatic and controlled processing in sentence recall: The role of long-term and working memory , 2004 .

[18]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Semantic and Episodic Effects on Bridging Inferences , 2000 .

[19]  B. Murdock.  Item and Order Information in Short-Term Serial Memory. , 1976 .

[20]  Alan Baddeley,et al.  Phonological and semantic strategies in immediate serial recall , 2008, Memory.

[21]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Why Do Alzheimer Patients Have Difficulty with Pronouns? Working Memory, Semantics, and Reference in Comprehension and Production in Alzheimer's Disease , 1999, Brain and Language.

[22]  Robert G. Crowder,et al.  Similarity and Order in Memory1 , 1979 .

[23]  A. Garnham,et al.  Antecedent focus and conceptual distance effects in category noun-phrase anaphora , 2005 .

[24]  Jean Saint-Aubin,et al.  Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there an effect on all trials , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  A. Almor,et al.  Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.

[26]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[27]  I. Neath.  Modality, concreteness, and set-size effects in a free reconstruction of order task , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. , 1977 .